Eyal Nir
J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):74-77. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103428. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
This article lays out a wide spectrum of candidate ethical solutions for the challenge on which this JME symposium focuses: the benefit:risk ratio challenge to some early-phase HIV cure and remission studies. These candidate solutions fall into four categories: ones that seek to reduce risks in early-phase HIV cure and remission studies, ones that enhance the benefits for these studies' participants (or show that those were adequate in the first place), ones that focus on participants' free and informed consent to participate and ones according to whom the large benefits to non-participants can defeat considerations about individual participant net risks. In so doing, this article also structures the rest of the symposium.
本文阐述了一系列候选伦理解决方案,以应对本《医学伦理学杂志》专题研讨会所聚焦的挑战:某些早期HIV治愈和缓解研究中的获益风险比挑战。这些候选解决方案分为四类:旨在降低早期HIV治愈和缓解研究风险的方案;提高这些研究参与者获益的方案(或表明这些获益从一开始就足够);关注参与者自由且知情同意参与的方案;以及认为对非参与者的巨大益处可压倒对个体参与者净风险考量的方案。在此过程中,本文还构建了研讨会的其余部分内容。