• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How to keep high-risk studies ethical: classifying candidate solutions.如何使高风险研究符合伦理规范:对候选解决方案进行分类。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):74-77. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103428. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
2
The benefit/risk ratio challenge in clinical research, and the case of HIV cure: an introduction.临床研究中的获益/风险比挑战,以及治愈艾滋病的案例:引言
J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):65-66. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103427. Epub 2016 May 23.
3
For love and money: the need to rethink benefits in HIV cure studies.为了爱与金钱:在艾滋病治愈研究中重新思考益处的必要性。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):96-99. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103119. Epub 2016 May 18.
4
First-in-human HIV-remission studies: reducing and justifying risk.首次人体HIV缓解研究:降低风险并证明其合理性。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):78-81. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103115. Epub 2016 May 3.
5
An activist's argument that participant values should guide risk-benefit ratio calculations in HIV cure research.一位活动家的观点,即参与者的价值观应指导艾滋病治愈研究中的风险效益比计算。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):100-103. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103120. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
6
Microbicide research in developing countries: have we given the ethical concerns due consideration?发展中国家的杀微生物剂研究:我们是否对伦理问题给予了充分考虑?
BMC Med Ethics. 2007 Sep 19;8:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-10.
7
The psychology of "cure" - unique challenges to consent processes in HIV cure research in South Africa.“治愈”的心理——南非 HIV 治愈研究中同意过程面临的独特挑战。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jan 24;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0348-z.
8
Informed consent to HIV cure research.对艾滋病治愈研究的知情同意。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):108-113. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103122. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
9
Ethics and stem cell therapeutics for cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病的伦理与干细胞治疗
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2007 Jul-Aug;50(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2007.02.003.
10
Cure research and consent: the Mississippi Baby, Barney Clark, Baby Fae and Martin Delaney.治疗研究与同意:密西西比婴儿、巴尼·克拉克、婴儿法伊和马丁·德莱尼。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):104-107. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103121. Epub 2016 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The ethical case for placebo control in HIV-cure-related studies with ART interruption.在与通过中断抗逆转录病毒治疗实现治愈HIV相关的研究中使用安慰剂对照的伦理依据。
J Virus Erad. 2022 Aug 28;8(3):100084. doi: 10.1016/j.jve.2022.100084. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Ethical and practical considerations for cell and gene therapy toward an HIV cure: findings from a qualitative in-depth interview study in the United States.细胞和基因治疗实现 HIV 治愈的伦理与实践考量:来自美国深入定性访谈研究的发现。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Apr 9;23(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00780-1.
3
Ethical considerations for HIV remission clinical research involving participants diagnosed during acute HIV infection.涉及急性 HIV 感染期诊断的 HIV 缓解临床研究的伦理考虑。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Dec 28;22(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00716-1.
4
Ethics of HIV cure research: an unfinished agenda.HIV 治愈研究的伦理问题:一个未竟的议程。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 30;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00651-1.
5
Is There an Ethical Upper Limit on Risks to Study Participants?研究参与者所面临的风险是否存在伦理上限?
Public Health Ethics. 2020 Nov 3;13(2):143-156. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa028. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
AIDS Activism and Coronavirus Vaccine Challenge Trials.艾滋病维权运动与新冠病毒疫苗挑战试验
AIDS Behav. 2020 Dec;24(12):3302-3305. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02953-8.
7
HIV Cure Research: Risks Patients Expressed Willingness to Accept.艾滋病治愈研究:患者表示愿意接受的风险。
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Nov;41(6):23-34. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500035.
8
The psychology of "cure" - unique challenges to consent processes in HIV cure research in South Africa.“治愈”的心理——南非 HIV 治愈研究中同意过程面临的独特挑战。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jan 24;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0348-z.
9
Ethical issues in HIV remission trials.HIV 缓解试验中的伦理问题。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2018 Sep;13(5):422-427. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000489.
10
What can the lived experience of participating in risky HIV cure-related studies establish?参与风险艾滋病毒治愈相关研究的亲身经历能确定什么?
J Med Ethics. 2018 Apr;44(4):277-278. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104593. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Stakeholder Engagement in HIV Cure Research: Lessons Learned from Other HIV Interventions and the Way Forward.利益相关者参与艾滋病治愈研究:从其他艾滋病干预措施中吸取的经验教训及未来方向。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015 Jul;29(7):389-99. doi: 10.1089/apc.2014.0348. Epub 2015 May 18.
2
The ethics of HIV "cure" research: what can we learn from consent forms?艾滋病病毒“治愈”研究的伦理:我们能从知情同意书中了解到什么?
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2015 Jan;31(1):56-63. doi: 10.1089/AID.2014.0219.
3
The risk-escalation model: a principled design strategy for early-phase trials.风险递增模型:早期试验的一种原则性设计策略。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2014 Jun;24(2):121-39. doi: 10.1353/ken.2014.0017.
4
Research into a functional cure for HIV in neonates: the need for ethical foresight.新生儿HIV功能性治愈研究:伦理前瞻性的必要性。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Sep;14(9):893-8. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70766-2. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
5
Towards an HIV cure: science and debate from the International AIDS Society 2013 symposium.迈向艾滋病治愈之路:来自 2013 年国际艾滋病协会研讨会的科学与争论。
Retrovirology. 2013 Nov 13;10:134. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-10-134.
6
Absence of detectable HIV-1 viremia after treatment cessation in an infant.婴儿停止治疗后未检测到可检测的 HIV-1 病毒血症。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 7;369(19):1828-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302976. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
7
Bid to cure HIV ramps up.
Nature. 2013 Jun 27;498(7455):417-8. doi: 10.1038/498417a.
8
Ethical considerations in HIV cure research: points to consider.HIV 治愈研究中的伦理考量:需要考虑的要点。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2013 May;8(3):243-9. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32835ea1c5.
9
Building an ethical foundation for first-in-human nanotrials.为人体首次纳米试验建立伦理基础。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Winter;40(4):802-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00708.x.
10
Dose escalation with overdose control using a quasi-continuous toxicity score in cancer Phase I clinical trials.在癌症 I 期临床试验中使用准连续毒性评分进行剂量递增和过量控制。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):949-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

如何使高风险研究符合伦理规范:对候选解决方案进行分类。

How to keep high-risk studies ethical: classifying candidate solutions.

作者信息

Eyal Nir

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):74-77. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103428. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2016-103428
PMID:27288098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5148732/
Abstract

This article lays out a wide spectrum of candidate ethical solutions for the challenge on which this JME symposium focuses: the benefit:risk ratio challenge to some early-phase HIV cure and remission studies. These candidate solutions fall into four categories: ones that seek to reduce risks in early-phase HIV cure and remission studies, ones that enhance the benefits for these studies' participants (or show that those were adequate in the first place), ones that focus on participants' free and informed consent to participate and ones according to whom the large benefits to non-participants can defeat considerations about individual participant net risks. In so doing, this article also structures the rest of the symposium.

摘要

本文阐述了一系列候选伦理解决方案,以应对本《医学伦理学杂志》专题研讨会所聚焦的挑战:某些早期HIV治愈和缓解研究中的获益风险比挑战。这些候选解决方案分为四类:旨在降低早期HIV治愈和缓解研究风险的方案;提高这些研究参与者获益的方案(或表明这些获益从一开始就足够);关注参与者自由且知情同意参与的方案;以及认为对非参与者的巨大益处可压倒对个体参与者净风险考量的方案。在此过程中,本文还构建了研讨会的其余部分内容。