Suppr超能文献

在大规模自我护理课程重新设计中,学生对课程内容传递的态度、学业表现及偏好

Students' Attitudes, Academic Performance and Preferences for Content Delivery in a Very Large Self-Care Course Redesign.

作者信息

Camiel Lana Dvorkin, Mistry Amee, Schnee David, Tataronis Gary, Taglieri Catherine, Zaiken Kathy, Patel Dhiren, Nigro Stefanie, Jacobson Susan, Goldman Jennifer

机构信息

Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 May 25;80(4):67. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80467.

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate students' performance/attitudes toward a flipped team-based learning (TBL) format in a "very large" self-care course based on student content delivery preference. Design. Third-year students enrolled in the course were surveyed regarding elements of redesign and homework completion. Additionally, their performance and incoming grade point average were evaluated. Assessment. A survey was completed by 286 of 305 students. Nineteen percent of respondents preferred traditional content delivery, whereas 30% preferred flipped TBL, 48% preferred a mixed format, and 3% had no preference. The grades achieved in the course were: A (49%), B (48%), C (3%) and D (0%). The majority completed "all" or "most" of the homework, appreciated attributes of course redesign, felt home preparation and in-class activities engaged them, and reported improved communication/evaluation skills. Content delivery preference significantly affected attitudes. Conclusion. Students positively received a flipped team-based learning classroom format, especially those who preferred flipped TBL or mixed content delivery. A minority with preference for traditional teaching style did not enjoy the new format; however, their academic performance did not differ significantly from those who did.

摘要

目的。根据学生对内容呈现方式的偏好,评估学生在一门 “非常大型” 的自我护理课程中对翻转式小组合作学习(TBL)模式的表现/态度。设计。对选修该课程的三年级学生就课程重新设计和作业完成情况进行了调查。此外,还评估了他们的表现和入学平均绩点。评估。305名学生中有286名完成了一项调查。19% 的受访者倾向于传统的内容呈现方式,30% 倾向于翻转式TBL,48% 倾向于混合模式,3% 没有偏好。该课程取得的成绩为:A(49%)、B(48%)、C(3%)和D(0%)。大多数学生完成了 “全部” 或 “大部分” 作业,认可课程重新设计的特点,觉得课前准备和课堂活动让他们参与其中,并表示沟通/评估技能有所提高。内容呈现方式的偏好显著影响态度。结论。学生对翻转式小组合作学习课堂模式反应积极,尤其是那些倾向于翻转式TBL或混合内容呈现方式的学生。少数偏好传统教学风格的学生不喜欢这种新形式;然而,他们的学业成绩与喜欢新形式的学生没有显著差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction.翻转课堂以提高学生的表现和满意度。
J Nurs Educ. 2013 Oct;52(10):597-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20130919-03. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
9
Using the flipped classroom in graduate nursing education.在研究生护理教育中使用翻转课堂。
Nurse Educ. 2013 Sep-Oct;38(5):210-3. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182a0e56a.
10
Medical education reimagined: a call to action.医学教育再构想:行动呼吁。
Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1407-10. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a368bd.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验