Reumkens Ankie, Rondagh Eveline J A, Bakker C Minke, Winkens Bjorn, Masclee Ad A M, Sanduleanu Silvia
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
NUTRIM, School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug;111(8):1092-101. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.234. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
Many studies around the world addressed the post-colonoscopy complications, but their pooled prevalence and time trends are unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies to examine the pooled prevalence of post-colonoscopy complications ("perforation", "bleeding", and "mortality"), stratified by colonoscopy indication. Temporal variability in the complication rate was assessed.
We queried Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane library for population-based studies examining post-colonoscopy complications (within 30 days), performed from 2001 to 2015 and published by 1 December 2015. We determined pooled prevalence of perforations, post-colonoscopy bleeding, post-polypectomy bleeding, and mortality.
We retrieved 1,074 studies, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, pooled prevalences for perforation, post-colonoscopy bleeding, and mortality were 0.5/1,000 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-0.7), 2.6/1,000 (95% CI 1.7-3.7), and 2.9/100,000 (95% CI 1.1-5.5) colonoscopies. Colonoscopy with polypectomy was associated with a perforation rate of 0.8/1,000 (95% CI 0.6-1.0) and a post-polypectomy bleeding rate of 9.8/1,000 (95% CI 7.7-12.1). Complication rate was lower for screening/surveillance than for diagnostic examinations. Time-trend analysis showed that post-colonoscopy bleeding declined from 6.4 to 1.0/1,000 colonoscopies, whereas the perforation and mortality rates remained stable from 2001 to 2015. Overall, considerable heterogeneity was observed in most of the analyses.
Worldwide, the post-colonoscopy complication rate remained stable or even declined over the past 15 years. The findings of this meta-analysis encourage continued efforts to achieve and maintain safety targets in colonoscopy practice.
世界各地许多研究探讨了结肠镜检查后并发症,但它们的合并患病率和时间趋势尚不清楚。我们对基于人群的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以检查结肠镜检查后并发症(“穿孔”、“出血”和“死亡”)的合并患病率,并按结肠镜检查指征分层。评估了并发症发生率的时间变异性。
我们在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中检索了2001年至2015年进行并于2015年12月1日前发表的基于人群的研究,这些研究探讨了结肠镜检查后并发症(30天内)。我们确定了穿孔、结肠镜检查后出血、息肉切除术后出血和死亡的合并患病率。
我们检索到1074项研究,其中21项符合纳入标准。总体而言,穿孔、结肠镜检查后出血和死亡的合并患病率分别为0.5/1000(95%置信区间(CI)0.4 - 0.7)、2.6/1000(95%CI 1.7 - 3.7)和2.9/100000(95%CI 1.1 - 5.5)次结肠镜检查。息肉切除术后结肠镜检查的穿孔率为0.8/1000(95%CI 0.6 - 1.0),息肉切除术后出血率为9.8/1000(95%CI 7.7 - 12.1)。筛查/监测的并发症发生率低于诊断性检查。时间趋势分析表明,结肠镜检查后出血从6.4/1000次结肠镜检查降至1.0/1000次结肠镜检查,而穿孔率和死亡率在2001年至2015年期间保持稳定。总体而言,大多数分析中观察到相当大的异质性。
在全球范围内,过去15年结肠镜检查后并发症发生率保持稳定甚至下降。这项荟萃分析的结果鼓励继续努力在结肠镜检查实践中实现并维持安全目标。