Ko H, Cathcart K S, Griffith D L, Peters G R, Adams W J
Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Mar;33(3):356-61. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.3.356.
Sixteen healthy male volunteers participated in a randomized, balanced, three-way crossover study comparing the pharmacokinetics of cefmetazole, cefoxitin, and cefmetazole with probenecid pretreatment. Single 2-g doses of cefmetazole sodium and cefoxitin sodium were given intravenously as a 5-min infusion. Concentrations of cefmetazole and cefoxitin were determined by using a specific semiautomated high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Concentration-time profiles of cefmetazole and cefoxitin declined in a biexponential manner from peak levels. Compared with cefoxitin, cefmetazole had a significantly (P less than 0.05) higher mean (+/- standard error of the mean) peak concentration in serum (290 +/- 11 versus 244 +/- 10 micrograms/ml), a longer terminal disposition half-life (1.50 +/- 0.14 versus 0.81 +/- 0.04 h), lower systemic clearance (111.7 +/- 4.7 versus 279 +/- 12 ml/min) and renal clearance (78.7 +/- 4.3 versus 221 +/- 14 ml/min) of intact drug, and a slightly smaller steady-state volume of distribution (10.3 +/- 0.21 versus 12.8 +/- 0.48 liters). Mean recoveries of cefmetazole and cefoxitin in urine were approximately 71 and 77%, respectively. Pretreatment of volunteers with probenecid (1 g orally) significantly (P less than 0.05) increased concentrations of cefmetazole in serum 1 h after drug administration without significantly increasing maximum concentrations in serum. Mean areas under the concentration-time curve (466 +/- 27 versus 295 +/- 13 micrograms.h/ml) and terminal disposition half-lives (2.27 +/- 0.13 versus 1.50 +/- 0.14 h) of cefmetazole increased. Systemic clearance (72.1 +/- 4.0 versus 111.7 +/- 4.7 ml/min) and renal clearance (47.4 +/- 4.0 versus 78.7 +/- 4.3 ml/min) of intact antibiotic decreased. Mean recoveries (65.9 +/- 3.7 versus 71.0 +/- 3.2%) of intact cefmetazole in urine were not significantly (P > 0.05) different. Elimination of cefmetazole in urine was also significantly prolonged by probenecid, with substantial concentrations of cefmetazole (>/= 20 micrograms/ml) found in the 12- to 24-h urine collection for 14 to 16 volunteers. The results show that cefmetazole remains at clinically relevant concentrations (1 to 2 micrograms/ml) approximately twice as long as cefoxitin, that serum cefmetazole can be maintained longer at clinically significant concentrations with preadministration of probenecid, and that cefmetazole is partially eliminated by renal tubule secretion.
16名健康男性志愿者参与了一项随机、平衡的三向交叉研究,比较了头孢美唑、头孢西丁以及头孢美唑与丙磺舒预处理联合使用时的药代动力学。静脉注射单剂量2g的头孢美唑钠和头孢西丁钠,输注时间为5分钟。采用特定的半自动高效液相色谱法测定头孢美唑和头孢西丁的浓度。头孢美唑和头孢西丁的浓度-时间曲线从峰值水平呈双指数方式下降。与头孢西丁相比,头孢美唑在血清中的平均(±平均标准误)峰值浓度显著更高(P<0.05)(290±11对244±10μg/ml),终末处置半衰期更长(1.50±0.14对0.81±0.),完整药物的全身清除率更低(111.7±4.7对279±12ml/min)和肾清除率更低(78.7±4.3对221±14ml/min),稳态分布容积略小(10.3±0.21对12.8±0.48升)。尿液中头孢美唑和头孢西丁的平均回收率分别约为71%和77%。志愿者口服丙磺舒(1g)预处理后,给药后1小时血清中头孢美唑的浓度显著升高(P<0.05),但血清中的最大浓度没有显著增加。头孢美唑的平均浓度-时间曲线下面积(466±27对295±13μg·h/ml)和终末处置半衰期(2.27±0.13对1.50±0.14小时)增加。完整抗生素的全身清除率(72.1±4.0对111.7±4.7ml/min)和肾清除率(47.4±4.0对78.7±4.3ml/min)降低。尿液中完整头孢美唑的平均回收率(65.9±3.7对71.0±3.2%)没有显著差异(P>0.05)。丙磺舒也显著延长了头孢美唑在尿液中的消除时间,14至16名志愿者在12至24小时尿液收集物中发现了大量的头孢美唑(≥20μg/ml)。结果表明,头孢美唑在临床相关浓度(1至2μg/ml)下保持的时间约为头孢西丁的两倍,丙磺舒预处理可使血清中头孢美唑在临床显著浓度下维持更长时间,且头孢美唑部分通过肾小管分泌消除。