Whitson Heather E, Johnson Kimberly S, Sloane Richard, Cigolle Christine T, Pieper Carl F, Landerman Lawrence, Hastings Susan N
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1668-73. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14201. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
To define multimorbidity "classes" empirically based on patterns of disease co-occurrence in older Americans and to examine how class membership predicts healthcare use.
Retrospective cohort study.
Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries in file years 1999-2007.
Individuals aged 65 and older in the Medicare Beneficiary Survey who had data available for at least 1 year after index interview (N = 14,052).
Surveys (self-report) were used to assess chronic conditions, and latent class analysis (LCA) was used to define multimorbidity classes based on the presence or absence of 13 conditions. All participants were assigned to a best-fit class. Primary outcomes were hospitalizations and emergency department visits over 1 year.
The primary LCA identified six classes. The largest portion of participants (32.7%) was assigned to the minimal disease class, in which most persons had fewer than two of the conditions. The other five classes represented various degrees and patterns of multimorbidity. Usage rates were higher in classes with greater morbidity, but many individuals could not be assigned to a particular class with confidence (sample misclassification error estimate = 0.36). Number of conditions predicted outcomes at least as well as class membership.
Although recognition of general patterns of disease co-occurrence is useful for policy planning, the heterogeneity of persons with significant multimorbidity (≥3 conditions) defies neat classification. A simple count of conditions may be preferable for predicting usage.
基于美国老年人疾病共现模式,实证性地定义多重疾病“类别”,并研究类别归属如何预测医疗服务利用情况。
回顾性队列研究。
1999 - 2007年医保受益人的全国代表性样本。
医保受益人调查中65岁及以上且在首次访谈后至少有1年可用数据的个体(N = 14,052)。
通过调查(自我报告)评估慢性病状况,并使用潜在类别分析(LCA)基于13种疾病的有无来定义多重疾病类别。所有参与者被分配到最适合的类别。主要结局是1年内的住院和急诊就诊情况。
主要的潜在类别分析确定了六个类别。最大比例的参与者(32.7%)被分配到疾病最少的类别,其中大多数人患有的疾病少于两种。其他五个类别代表了多重疾病的不同程度和模式。发病率较高的类别使用率也较高,但许多个体无法被自信地分配到特定类别(样本错误分类误差估计 = 0.36)。疾病数量对结局的预测至少与类别归属一样好。
虽然认识疾病共现的一般模式对政策规划有用,但患有严重多重疾病(≥3种疾病)的人群的异质性难以进行精确分类。对于预测医疗服务利用情况,简单计算疾病数量可能更可取。