• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子泵抑制剂治疗在喉咽反流患者中作用的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis for the role of proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

作者信息

Wei Chunhui

机构信息

Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital Attached of Capital Medical University, No. 95, Yongan Road, Xicheng Road, Beijing, 100050, China.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;273(11):3795-3801. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4142-y. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-016-4142-y
PMID:27312992
Abstract

We aimed to systematically review the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the therapeutic efficiency of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Randomized and placebo-controlled trials regarding the therapeutic efficacy of PPIs on LPR patients were systematically searched from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. Data were extracted from eligible studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity among these eligible studies was evaluated by the Q-statistic and I test, based on which a fixed- or random-effects model was performed to pooled relative risks (RRs) for the response rate and standardized mean differences (SMDs) for reflux symptom index (RSI) and the reflux finding score (RFS). Potential publication bias was evaluated by trim and fill method. Totally, 13 RCTs including 831 LPR patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. Pooled results demonstrated that the total RSI significantly improved for patients who received PPI therapy by comparing with those receiving placebo (SMD = 3.65; 95 % CI 1.56-5.75), though no significant difference was found in response rate (RR = 0.04, 95 % CI -0.06 to 0.14) and RFS (SMD = 0.91; 95 % CI -0.53 to 2.35) between these two groups of patients. No publication bias was found among eligible studies. PPI treatment could significantly improve reflux symptoms in LPR patients and, therefore, should be taken into consideration for LPR management with other strategies, such as lifestyle modification.

摘要

我们旨在系统评价质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗喉咽反流(LPR)的疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。从MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和EMBASE中系统检索关于PPI对LPR患者治疗效果的随机和安慰剂对照试验。从符合纳入标准的合格研究中提取数据。通过Q统计量和I²检验评估这些合格研究之间的异质性,在此基础上采用固定效应或随机效应模型对缓解率的合并相对风险(RRs)以及反流症状指数(RSI)和反流发现评分(RFS)的标准化平均差(SMDs)进行汇总。通过修剪和填充法评估潜在的发表偏倚。共有13项RCT(包括831例LPR患者)符合本荟萃分析的条件。汇总结果表明,与接受安慰剂的患者相比,接受PPI治疗的患者的总RSI有显著改善(SMD = 3.65;95%CI 1.56 - 5.75),尽管两组患者在缓解率(RR = 0.04,95%CI -0.06至0.14)和RFS(SMD = 0.91;95%CI -0.53至2.35)方面未发现显著差异。在合格研究中未发现发表偏倚。PPI治疗可显著改善LPR患者的反流症状,因此,在LPR管理中应与其他策略(如生活方式改变)一起考虑使用。

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis for the role of proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.质子泵抑制剂治疗在喉咽反流患者中作用的荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;273(11):3795-3801. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4142-y. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
2
Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy for the Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.质子泵抑制剂治疗喉咽反流:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr;50(4):295-300. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000324.
3
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux.质子泵抑制剂治疗喉咽反流症状疗效的荟萃分析。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016 Jul 4;49(7). doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20165149.
4
Relationship between extralaryngeal endoscopic findings, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) response, and pH measures in suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux.疑似喉咽反流中喉内镜检查结果、质子泵抑制剂(PPI)反应与 pH 值测量的关系。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Apr 1;32(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy072.
5
Influence of age on treatment with proton pump inhibitors in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a prospective multicenter study.年龄对喉咽反流病患者质子泵抑制剂治疗的影响:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;139(12):1291-5. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5556.
6
Proton Pump Inhibitors for the Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. A Systematic Review.质子泵抑制剂治疗喉咽反流:系统评价。
J Voice. 2020 Nov;34(6):918-929. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 31.
7
Nissen fundoplication proton pump inhibitors for laryngopharyngeal reflux based on pH-monitoring and symptom-scale.基于 pH 监测和症状量表的尼森胃底折叠术质子泵抑制剂治疗喉咽反流
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 May 21;23(19):3546-3555. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i19.3546.
8
Magnesium alginate versus proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.藻酸镁与质子泵抑制剂治疗咽喉反流的比较:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 May;279(5):2533-2542. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07219-0. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
9
Effects of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux on Posttreatment Symptoms and Hypopharyngeal pH.质子泵抑制剂治疗喉咽反流对治疗后症状及下咽pH值的影响
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jun;150(6):1010-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599814525577. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
10
Efficacy of three proton-pump inhibitor therapeutic strategies on laryngopharyngeal reflux disease; a prospective randomized double-blind study.三种质子泵抑制剂治疗策略对咽喉反流病的疗效:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Jul;44(4):612-618. doi: 10.1111/coa.13345. Epub 2019 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers for Treatment of Extraesophageal Symptoms and Signs.用于治疗食管外症状和体征的钾竞争性酸阻滞剂
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Apr 30;31(2):170-177. doi: 10.5056/jnm24159.
2
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Management: A Narrative Review.喉咽反流的病理生理学、临床表现及管理:一篇叙述性综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 20;16(8):e67305. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67305. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Reflux Finding Score and Reflux Symptom Index Potential Indicators for Diagnosis and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
[The therapeutic effect of proton pump inhibitor on alleviation of hoarseness symptoms in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux].[质子泵抑制剂对缓解喉咽反流患者声音嘶哑症状的治疗效果]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jun;29(11):997-1001.
2
Proton Pump Inhibitors Versus Solitary Lifestyle Modification in Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Evaluating Who is at Risk: Scenario in a Developing Country.质子泵抑制剂与单纯生活方式改变在喉咽反流管理及评估高危人群中的比较:发展中国家的情况
Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat. 2014 Feb 25;7:1-5. doi: 10.4137/CMENT.S13799. eCollection 2014.
3
反流发现评分和反流症状指数:喉咽反流疾病诊断与管理的潜在指标
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):3239-3244. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04657-0. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
4
The efficacy and safety of itopride as an add-on therapy to a proton pump inhibitor in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.伊托必利作为质子泵抑制剂的附加疗法用于治疗胃食管反流病的疗效和安全性。
Prz Gastroenterol. 2024;19(1):60-66. doi: 10.5114/pg.2023.133915. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
5
Meta-analysis of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Treatment of Pharyngeal Reflux Disease.质子泵抑制剂治疗咽反流病的荟萃分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 21;2022:9105814. doi: 10.1155/2022/9105814. eCollection 2022.
6
The Effect of Hyaluronic Acid and Chondroitin Sulphate-Based Medical Device Combined with Acid Suppression in the Treatment of Atypical Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.基于透明质酸和硫酸软骨素的医疗器械联合抑酸治疗胃食管反流病非典型症状的疗效
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 29;11(7):1890. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071890.
7
Laryngopharyngeal reflux induced sleep-related laryngospasm.喉咽反流诱发与睡眠相关的喉痉挛。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Feb;192(1):335-340. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-02934-x. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
Magnesium alginate versus proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.藻酸镁与质子泵抑制剂治疗咽喉反流的比较:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 May;279(5):2533-2542. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07219-0. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
9
Reflux-related Extraesophageal Symptoms Until Proven Otherwise: A Direct Measurement of Abnormal Proximal Exposure Based on Hypopharyngeal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance as a Reliable Indicator for Successful Treatment Outcomes.反流相关的食管外症状——除非另有证明:基于下咽多通道腔内阻抗对近端异常暴露的直接测量作为成功治疗结果的可靠指标
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Jan 30;28(1):69-77. doi: 10.5056/jnm20228.
10
Laryngopharyngeal reflux: is laparoscopic fundoplication an effective treatment?喉咽反流:腹腔镜胃底折叠术是一种有效的治疗方法吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022 Feb;104(2):79-87. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0046. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
Assessing laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms with the Reflux Symptom Index: validation and prevalence in the Greek population.
使用反流症状指数评估喉咽反流症状:希腊人群的验证和患病率。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Dec;145(6):974-80. doi: 10.1177/0194599811425142. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
4
Randomised clinical trial: high-dose acid suppression for chronic cough - a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.随机临床试验:高剂量酸抑制治疗慢性咳嗽 - 一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jan;33(2):225-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04511.x. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
5
Rabeprazole is effective in treating laryngopharyngeal reflux in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.雷贝拉唑在一项随机安慰剂对照试验中治疗咽反流有效。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Sep;8(9):770-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
6
The effect of esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily on acoustic and perception parameters of the voice in laryngopharyngeal reflux.埃索美拉唑 20 毫克,每日两次对咽喉反流患者的声音声学和感知参数的影响。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010 Feb;22(2):134-41, e44-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01392.x. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
7
Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with esomeprazole for symptoms and signs associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux.埃索美拉唑治疗喉咽反流相关症状和体征的双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Sep;139(3):414-20. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.06.003.
8
Medical therapy of reflux laryngitis.反流性喉炎的药物治疗
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 May-Jun;42(5):589-93. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318169021d.
9
Laryngopharyngeal reflux: diagnosis and treatment of a controversial disease.喉咽反流:一种有争议疾病的诊断与治疗
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Feb;8(1):28-33. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3282f3f44f.
10
Efficacy of once-daily esomeprazole treatment in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux evaluated by 24-hour pH monitoring.通过24小时pH监测评估每日一次埃索美拉唑治疗对喉咽反流患者的疗效。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Feb;136(2):205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.10.011.