Wang Yafei, de Groot Rudolf, Bakker Frank, Wörtche Heinrich, Leemans Rik
Environmental System Analysis Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
INCAS3, P.O. Box 797, 9400 AT, Assen, The Netherlands.
Int J Biometeorol. 2017 Jan;61(1):87-101. doi: 10.1007/s00484-016-1193-0. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
To better understand the influence of urban green infrastructure (UGI) on outdoor human thermal comfort, a survey and physical measurements were performed at the campus of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, in spring and summer 2015. Three hundred eighty-nine respondents were interviewed in five different green spaces. We aimed to analyze people's thermal comfort perception and preference in outdoor urban green spaces, and to specify the combined effects between the thermal environmental and personal factors. The results imply that non-physical environmental and subjective factors (e.g., natural view, quiet environment, and emotional background) were more important in perceiving comfort than the actual thermal conditions. By applying a linear regression and probit analysis, the comfort temperature was found to be 22.2 °C and the preferred temperature was at a surprisingly high 35.7 °C. This can be explained by the observation that most respondents, who live in temperate regions, have a natural tendency to describe their preferred state as "warmer" even when feeling "warm" already. Using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, the four significant factors influencing thermal comfort were people's exposure time in green spaces, previous thermal environment and activity, and their thermal history. However, the effect of thermal history needs further investigation due to the unequal sample sizes of respondents from different climate regions. By providing evidence for the role of the objective and subjective factors on human thermal comfort, the relationship between UGI, microclimate, and thermal comfort can assist urban planning to make better use of green spaces for microclimate regulation.
为了更好地理解城市绿色基础设施(UGI)对户外人体热舒适度的影响,2015年春夏季在荷兰格罗宁根大学校园进行了一项调查和实地测量。在五个不同的绿地对389名受访者进行了访谈。我们旨在分析人们在户外城市绿地中的热舒适度感知和偏好,并明确热环境因素和个人因素之间的综合影响。结果表明,在感知舒适度方面,非物理环境和主观因素(如自然景观、安静的环境和情感背景)比实际热条件更为重要。通过应用线性回归和概率分析,发现舒适温度为22.2℃,而偏好温度竟高达35.7℃。这可以通过以下观察结果来解释:大多数生活在温带地区的受访者,即使已经感觉“温暖”,也自然倾向于将他们偏好的状态描述为“更温暖”。使用Kruskal-Wallis H检验,影响热舒适度的四个重要因素是人们在绿地中的暴露时间、先前的热环境和活动以及他们的热经历。然而,由于来自不同气候区域的受访者样本量不均衡,热经历的影响需要进一步研究。通过为客观和主观因素对人体热舒适度的作用提供证据,UGI、小气候和热舒适度之间的关系可以帮助城市规划更好地利用绿地进行小气候调节。