Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), AUT Millennium, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sports Med. 2017 Mar;47(3):479-501. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0575-0.
Weight-training sports, including weightlifting, powerlifting, bodybuilding, strongman, Highland Games, and CrossFit, are weight-training sports that have separate divisions for males and females of a variety of ages, competitive standards, and bodyweight classes. These sports may be considered dangerous because of the heavy loads commonly used in training and competition.
Our objective was to systematically review the injury epidemiology of these weight-training sports, and, where possible, gain some insight into whether this may be affected by age, sex, competitive standard, and bodyweight class.
We performed an electronic search using PubMed, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and Embase for injury epidemiology studies involving competitive athletes in these weight-training sports. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed journal articles only, with no limit placed on date or language of publication. We assessed the risk of bias in all studies using an adaption of the musculoskeletal injury review method.
Only five of the 20 eligible studies had a risk of bias score ≥75 %, meaning the risk of bias in these five studies was considered low. While 14 of the studies had sample sizes >100 participants, only four studies utilized a prospective design. Bodybuilding had the lowest injury rates (0.12-0.7 injuries per lifter per year; 0.24-1 injury per 1000 h), with strongman (4.5-6.1 injuries per 1000 h) and Highland Games (7.5 injuries per 1000 h) reporting the highest rates. The shoulder, lower back, knee, elbow, and wrist/hand were generally the most commonly injured anatomical locations; strains, tendinitis, and sprains were the most common injury type. Very few significant differences in any of the injury outcomes were observed as a function of age, sex, competitive standard, or bodyweight class.
While the majority of the research we reviewed utilized retrospective designs, the weight-training sports appear to have relatively low rates of injury compared with common team sports. Future weight-training sport injury epidemiology research needs to be improved, particularly in terms of the use of prospective designs, diagnosis of injury, and changes in risk exposure.
举重运动包括举重、力量举重、健美、大力士、高地游戏和 CrossFit 等,这些运动都有为不同年龄、竞技水平和体重级别的男性和女性设立的单独组别。这些运动可能被认为是危险的,因为在训练和比赛中经常使用重物。
我们的目的是系统地回顾这些举重运动的损伤流行病学,并在可能的情况下,了解这是否可能受到年龄、性别、竞技标准和体重级别等因素的影响。
我们使用 PubMed、SPORTDiscus、CINAHL 和 Embase 进行电子检索,以获取涉及这些举重运动的竞技运动员的损伤流行病学研究。合格的研究仅包括同行评议的期刊文章,对发表日期或语言没有限制。我们使用肌肉骨骼损伤审查方法的改编版评估所有研究的偏倚风险。
只有 20 项合格研究中有 5 项的偏倚风险评分≥75%,这意味着这 5 项研究的偏倚风险较低。虽然 14 项研究的样本量>100 名参与者,但只有 4 项研究采用了前瞻性设计。健美运动的受伤率最低(每位运动员每年 0.12-0.7 次受伤;每 1000 小时 0.24-1 次受伤),大力士和高地游戏的受伤率最高(每 1000 小时 4.5-6.1 次受伤)。肩部、下背部、膝盖、肘部和手腕/手通常是最常见的受伤解剖部位;拉伤、肌腱炎和扭伤是最常见的损伤类型。几乎没有观察到任何与年龄、性别、竞技标准或体重级别相关的任何损伤结果的显著差异。
虽然我们审查的大多数研究都使用了回顾性设计,但与常见的团队运动相比,举重运动的受伤率似乎相对较低。未来的举重运动损伤流行病学研究需要改进,特别是在前瞻性设计的使用、损伤的诊断以及风险暴露的变化方面。