Lauche Romy, Stumpe Christoph, Fehr Johannes, Cramer Holger, Cheng Ying Wu, Wayne Peter M, Rampp Thomas, Langhorst Jost, Dobos Gustav
Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
J Pain. 2016 Sep;17(9):1013-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
This study aimed to test the efficacy of Tai Chi for treating chronic neck pain. Subjects with chronic nonspecific neck pain were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of group Tai Chi or conventional neck exercises with weekly sessions of 75 to 90 minutes, or a wait-list control. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity (visual analogue scale). Secondary outcomes included pain on movement, functional disability, quality of life, well-being and perceived stress, postural and interoceptive awareness, satisfaction, and safety. Altogether, 114 participants were included (91 women, 49.4 ± 11.7 years of age). After 12 weeks Tai Chi participants reported significantly less pain compared with the wait list group (average difference in mm on the visual analogue scale: -10.5; 95% confidence interval, -20.3 to -.9; P = .033). Group differences were also found for pain on movement, functional disability, and quality of life compared with the wait list group. No differences were found for Tai Chi compared with neck exercises. Patients' satisfaction with both exercise interventions was high, and only minor side effects were observed. Tai Chi was more effective than no treatment in improving pain in subjects with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Because Tai Chi is probably as effective as neck exercises it may be considered a suitable alternative to conventional exercises for those with a preference toward Tai Chi.
This article presents results of a randomized controlled trial comparing Tai Chi, conventional neck exercises, and no treatment for chronic nonspecific neck pain. Results indicate that Tai Chi exercises and conventional neck exercises are equally effective in improving pain and quality of life therefore representing beneficial interventions for neck pain.
本研究旨在测试太极拳治疗慢性颈痛的疗效。患有慢性非特异性颈痛的受试者被随机分配到为期12周的太极拳组或传统颈部锻炼组,每周训练75至90分钟,还有一个等待名单对照组。主要结局指标为疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)。次要结局包括运动时疼痛、功能障碍、生活质量、幸福感和感知压力、姿势和本体感觉、满意度及安全性。总共纳入了114名参与者(91名女性,年龄49.4±11.7岁)。12周后,与等待名单组相比,太极拳组参与者报告的疼痛明显减轻(视觉模拟量表上的平均差值,单位为毫米:-10.5;95%置信区间,-20.3至-0.9;P = 0.033)。与等待名单组相比,在运动时疼痛、功能障碍和生活质量方面也发现了组间差异。与颈部锻炼相比,太极拳组未发现差异。患者对两种运动干预的满意度都很高,仅观察到轻微的副作用。在改善慢性非特异性颈痛患者的疼痛方面,太极拳比不治疗更有效。由于太极拳可能与颈部锻炼效果相当,对于偏爱太极拳的人来说,它可能被视为传统锻炼的合适替代方法。
本文介绍了一项随机对照试验的结果,该试验比较了太极拳、传统颈部锻炼和不治疗慢性非特异性颈痛的效果。结果表明,太极拳锻炼和传统颈部锻炼在改善疼痛和生活质量方面同样有效,因此是治疗颈痛的有益干预措施。