Toxicological Centre, University of Antwerp , Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute , SE-100 31 Stockholm, Sweden.
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 19;50(14):7752-60. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00246. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
We compared the human exposure to organophosphate flame retardants (PFRs) via inhalation, dust ingestion, and dermal absorption using different sampling and assessment strategies. Air (indoor stationary air and personal ambient air), dust (floor dust and surface dust), and hand wipes were sampled from 61 participants and their houses. We found that stationary air contains higher levels of ΣPFRs (median = 163 ng/m(3), IQR = 161 ng/m(3)) than personal air (median = 44 ng/m(3), IQR = 55 ng/m(3)), suggesting that the stationary air sample could generate a larger bias for inhalation exposure assessment. Tris(chloropropyl) phosphate isomers (ΣTCPP) accounted for over 80% of ΣPFRs in both stationary and personal air. PFRs were frequently detected in both surface dust (ΣPFRs median = 33 100 ng/g, IQR = 62 300 ng/g) and floor dust (ΣPFRs median = 20 500 ng/g, IQR = 30 300 ng/g). Tris(2-butoxylethyl) phosphate (TBOEP) accounted for 40% and 60% of ΣPFRs in surface and floor dust, respectively, followed by ΣTCPP (30% and 20%, respectively). TBOEP (median = 46 ng, IQR = 69 ng) and ΣTCPP (median = 37 ng, IQR = 49 ng) were also frequently detected in hand wipe samples. For the first time, a comprehensive assessment of human exposure to PFRs via inhalation, dust ingestion, and dermal absorption was conducted with individual personal data rather than reference factors of the general population. Inhalation seems to be the major exposure pathway for ΣTCPP and tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP), while participants had higher exposure to TBOEP and triphenyl phosphate (TPHP) via dust ingestion. Estimated exposure to ΣPFRs was the highest with stationary air inhalation (median =34 ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1), IQR = 38 ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1)), followed by surface dust ingestion (median = 13 ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1), IQR = 28 ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1)), floor dust ingestion and personal air inhalation. The median dermal exposure on hand wipes was 0.32 ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1) (IQR = 0.58 ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1)) for ΣTCPP. The selection of sampling and assessment strategies could significantly affect the results of exposure assessment.
我们比较了人类通过吸入、灰尘摄入和皮肤吸收接触有机磷酸酯阻燃剂 (PFRs) 的情况,使用了不同的采样和评估策略。从 61 名参与者及其家中采集了空气(室内固定空气和个人环境空气)、灰尘(地板灰尘和表面灰尘)和手部擦拭物。我们发现,固定空气中的ΣPFRs(中位数=163ng/m(3),IQR=161ng/m(3))水平高于个人空气(中位数=44ng/m(3),IQR=55ng/m(3)),这表明固定空气样本可能会对吸入暴露评估产生更大的偏差。三(氯丙基)磷酸酯异构体(ΣTCPP)在固定空气和个人空气中均占ΣPFRs 的 80%以上。表面灰尘(ΣPFRs 中位数=33100ng/g,IQR=62300ng/g)和地板灰尘(ΣPFRs 中位数=20500ng/g,IQR=30300ng/g)中经常检测到 PFRs。三(2-丁氧基乙基)磷酸酯(TBOEP)分别占表面灰尘和地板灰尘中ΣPFRs 的 40%和 60%,其次是ΣTCPP(分别占 30%和 20%)。TBOEP(中位数=46ng,IQR=69ng)和ΣTCPP(中位数=37ng,IQR=49ng)也经常在手部擦拭物样本中检测到。首次使用个体个人数据而不是一般人群的参考因素,对人类通过吸入、灰尘摄入和皮肤吸收接触 PFRs 进行了全面评估。吸入似乎是ΣTCPP 和三(2-氯乙基)磷酸酯(TCEP)的主要暴露途径,而参与者通过灰尘摄入对 TBOEP 和三苯基磷酸酯(TPHP)的暴露更高。通过固定空气吸入(中位数=34ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1),IQR=38ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1))估计的ΣPFRs 暴露最高,其次是表面灰尘摄入(中位数=13ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1),IQR=28ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1)),地板灰尘摄入和个人空气吸入。手部擦拭物中ΣTCPP 的皮肤暴露中位数为 0.32ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1)(IQR=0.58ng·kg bw(-1)·day(-1))。采样和评估策略的选择会显著影响暴露评估的结果。