Mutawila C, Stander C, Halleen F, Vivier M A, Mostert L
Department of Plant Pathology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.
Institute of Wine Biotechnology, Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa.
Protoplasma. 2017 Mar;254(2):863-879. doi: 10.1007/s00709-016-0997-4. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
Cell suspension cultures of Vitis vinifera cv. Dauphine berries were used to study the response to the vascular pathogen, Eutypa lata, in comparison with a biological control agent, Trichoderma atroviride, that was previously shown to be effective in pruning wound protection. The expression of genes coding for enzymes of the phenylpropanoid pathway and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins was profiled over a 48-h period using quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. The cell cultures responded to elicitors of both fungi with a hypersensitive-like response that lead to a decrease in cell viability. Similar genes were triggered by both the pathogen and biocontrol agent, but the timing patterns and magnitude of expression was dependent on the specific fungal elicitor. Culture filtrates of both fungi caused upregulation of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), 4-coumaroyl Co-A ligase (CCo-A) and stilbene synthase (STS), and a downregulation of chalcone synthase (CHS) genes. The pathogen filtrate caused a biphasic pattern in the upregulation of PAL and STS genes which was not observed in cells treated with filtrates of the biocontrol agent. Analytical assays showed significantly higher total phenolic content and chitinolytic enzyme activity in the cell cultures treated with the T. atroviride filtrate compared to the pathogen filtrate. These results corresponded well to the higher expression of PAL and chitinase class IV genes. The response of the cell cultures to T. atroviride filtrate provides support for the notion that the wound protection by the biocontrol agent at least partially relies on the induction of grapevine resistance mechanisms.
利用葡萄品种“多芬”浆果的细胞悬浮培养物来研究其对维管束病原体——葡萄顶枯病菌(Eutypa lata)的反应,并与一种生物防治剂——哈茨木霉(Trichoderma atroviride)进行比较,此前已证明该生物防治剂在修剪伤口保护方面有效。使用定量逆转录聚合酶链式反应在48小时内对编码苯丙烷途径酶和病程相关(PR)蛋白的基因表达进行了分析。细胞培养物对两种真菌的激发子都产生了类似过敏反应的反应,导致细胞活力下降。病原体和生物防治剂都触发了相似的基因,但表达的时间模式和幅度取决于特定的真菌激发子。两种真菌的培养滤液均导致苯丙氨酸解氨酶(PAL)、4-香豆酰辅酶A连接酶(CCo-A)和芪合酶(STS)上调,以及查尔酮合酶(CHS)基因下调。病原体滤液在PAL和STS基因上调中呈现双相模式,而在用生物防治剂滤液处理的细胞中未观察到这种模式。分析测定表明,与病原体滤液相比,用哈茨木霉滤液处理的细胞培养物中总酚含量和几丁质分解酶活性显著更高。这些结果与PAL和IV类几丁质酶基因的更高表达非常吻合。细胞培养物对哈茨木霉滤液的反应为生物防治剂的伤口保护至少部分依赖于诱导葡萄抗性机制这一观点提供了支持。