Suppr超能文献

政策的影响力:吸烟政策与青少年吸烟的关系

The power of policy: the relationship of smoking policy to adolescent smoking.

作者信息

Pentz M A, Brannon B R, Charlin V L, Barrett E J, MacKinnon D P, Flay B R

机构信息

Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Pasadena 91101.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1989 Jul;79(7):857-62. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.7.857.

Abstract

This study examined the effects of smoking policy on 4,807 adolescents in 23 schools over a two-county area in California. Amounts and prevalence rates of adolescent smoking were measured with a self-report survey and a biochemical measure; school smoking policy was measured with two independent surveys of school staff. Policy effects were evaluated with multiple and logistic regression analyses controlling for school-level socioeconomic status and environmental support for teaching and administration. Of the 23 schools, 100 percent had a formal written and regularly enforced policy component restricting student smoking on school grounds, 94 percent restricted students leaving school grounds, 65 percent restricted smoking near school grounds, and 57 percent had a smoking prevention education plan. Schools with policies having all four versus less than four components, high versus low emphasis on prevention, and a low versus high emphasis on cessation reported lower amounts of smoking in the last week and in the last 24 hours. Punitive consequences of policy violation had no effect. Results were compared to school staff observations of adolescent smoking, and school archival records of student smoking violations in the last year. Results suggest that school smoking policy is associated with decreased amounts of smoking in adolescents.

摘要

本研究调查了加利福尼亚州两个县23所学校的4807名青少年吸烟政策的影响。通过自我报告调查和生化检测来测量青少年吸烟的数量和流行率;通过对学校工作人员进行的两项独立调查来测量学校的吸烟政策。在控制了学校层面的社会经济地位以及教学和管理的环境支持因素后,采用多元回归分析和逻辑回归分析对政策效果进行评估。在这23所学校中,100%有正式的书面且定期执行的政策条款,限制学生在校园内吸烟;94%限制学生离开校园;65%限制在校园附近吸烟;57%有吸烟预防教育计划。具有全部四项而非少于四项政策条款、对预防的重视程度高而非低以及对戒烟的重视程度低而非高的学校,报告称学生上周和过去24小时内的吸烟量较低。违反政策的惩罚性后果没有影响。研究结果与学校工作人员对青少年吸烟情况的观察以及学校过去一年学生吸烟违规行为的档案记录进行了比较。结果表明,学校吸烟政策与青少年吸烟量减少有关。

相似文献

5
The influence of school smoking policies on student tobacco use.学校吸烟政策对学生烟草使用的影响。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Sep;161(9):842-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.9.842.
6
School policy: what helps to reduce teenage smoking?学校政策:什么有助于减少青少年吸烟?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Aug;5(4):507-13. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000118559.
9
Compliance and support for smoke-free school policies.对无烟学校政策的遵守与支持。
Health Educ Res. 2005 Aug;20(4):466-75. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg143. Epub 2004 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
An Overview of Tobacco Policies in Kansas Unified School Districts.堪萨斯州统一学区烟草政策概述。
Kans J Med. 2022 Apr 29;15(1):127-130. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.15916. eCollection 2022.
2
Attribute-centred theorizing to address behavioural changes.基于属性的理论化方法以解决行为变化问题。
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Nov 1;99(11):828-833. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.285363. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
8
School policies for preventing smoking among young people.学校预防青少年吸烟的政策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 24;2014(10):CD009990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009990.pub2.
10
The impact of school alcohol policy on student drinking.学校酒精政策对学生饮酒的影响。
Health Educ Res. 2013 Aug;28(4):651-62. doi: 10.1093/her/cyt068. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

3
Premature deaths avoided by the antismoking campaign.反吸烟运动避免的过早死亡。
Am J Public Health. 1983 Jun;73(6):672-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.6.672.
6
Secular trends in underreporting of cigarette consumption.香烟消费报告不足的长期趋势。
Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Aug;122(2):341-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114106.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验