Brust Vera, Guenther Anja
Behavioural Biology, University of Osnabrück, Barbarastraße 11, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.
Department of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Morgenbreede 45, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany.
Behav Processes. 2017 Jan;134:4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
In human psychological research, personality traits as well as cognitive traits are usually validated for both, their stability over time and contexts. While stability over time gives an estimate on how genetically fixated a trait can be, correlations across traits have the power to reveal linkages or trade - offs. In animals, these validations have widely been done for personality but not for cognitive traits. We tested guinea pigs in four consecutive discrimination tasks using four unique pairs of objects with two objects of the same form but different size in each pair. The same animals were tested twice each for three personality traits, i.e. boldness, aggression and sociopositive behaviour. The animals did not learn to "always choose the larger item" in the cognitive task but learned to discriminate the two objects of each stimulus pair anew, so that we did test for learning speed in four slightly different task setups. Performance over the four tasks was significantly repeatable as well as all tested personality traits. A stable linkage over time was found between sociopositive behaviour and learning performance, probably indicating an ecological relevance for a correlation between these two traits. Still, not all traits seem to be connected amongst each other, as in our case boldness and aggression are both not linked to individual learning performance. Future studies will hopefully further investigate the repeatability of various cognitive traits in several species and thus lead to a better understanding of the interdependence of personality and cognition. This will help to unravel which suites of traits facilitate individual life histories and hence improve our understanding of the emergence and maintenance of individual differences.
在人类心理学研究中,人格特质以及认知特质通常会就其在时间和情境中的稳定性进行验证。时间上的稳定性能估计出一种特质在基因上的固定程度,而特质之间的相关性则能够揭示联系或权衡。在动物研究中,这些验证大多针对人格特质进行,而未针对认知特质。我们使用四对独特的物体对豚鼠进行了连续四项辨别任务测试,每对物体中有两个形状相同但大小不同的物体。对同一批动物的三种人格特质,即大胆、攻击性和社会积极行为,各进行了两次测试。这些动物在认知任务中没有学会“总是选择较大的物品”,而是学会了重新辨别每个刺激对中的两个物体,因此我们在四种略有不同的任务设置中测试了学习速度。四项任务的表现以及所有测试的人格特质都具有显著的可重复性。我们发现社会积极行为和学习表现之间存在随时间稳定的联系,这可能表明这两种特质之间的相关性具有生态意义。然而,并非所有特质似乎都相互关联,比如在我们的研究中,大胆和攻击性都与个体学习表现无关。未来的研究有望进一步探究多种认知特质在多个物种中的可重复性,从而更好地理解人格与认知的相互依存关系。这将有助于揭示哪些特质组合有助于个体的生活历程,进而增进我们对个体差异的出现和维持的理解。