Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale du CNRS UMR5321, Evolutionary Ecology Group, 2 route du CNRS, 09200 Moulis, France
Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, 21 allée de Brienne, 31015 Toulouse, France.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 26;373(1756). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0281.
Behavioural and cognitive processes play important roles in mediating an individual's interactions with its environment. Yet, while there is a vast literature on repeatable individual differences in behaviour, relatively little is known about the repeatability of cognitive performance. To further our understanding of the evolution of cognition, we gathered 44 studies on individual performance of 25 species across six animal classes and used meta-analysis to assess whether cognitive performance is repeatable. We compared repeatability () in performance (1) on the same task presented at different times (temporal repeatability), and (2) on different tasks that measured the same putative cognitive ability (contextual repeatability). We also addressed whether estimates were influenced by seven extrinsic factors (moderators): type of cognitive performance measurement, type of cognitive task, delay between tests, origin of the subjects, experimental context, taxonomic class and publication status. We found support for both temporal and contextual repeatability of cognitive performance, with mean estimates ranging between 0.15 and 0.28. Repeatability estimates were mostly influenced by the type of cognitive performance measures and publication status. Our findings highlight the widespread occurrence of consistent inter-individual variation in cognition across a range of taxa which, like behaviour, may be associated with fitness outcomes.This article is part of the theme issue 'Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities'.
行为和认知过程在调节个体与环境的相互作用中起着重要作用。然而,尽管有大量关于行为可重复个体差异的文献,但对于认知表现的可重复性却知之甚少。为了进一步了解认知的进化,我们收集了来自六个动物类群的 25 个物种的 44 项个体表现研究,并使用荟萃分析来评估认知表现是否具有可重复性。我们比较了在不同时间呈现的相同任务(时间重复性)和测量相同假定认知能力的不同任务(情境重复性)上的表现的可重复性()。我们还探讨了七个外在因素(调节剂)是否会影响估计值:认知表现测量的类型、认知任务的类型、测试之间的延迟、被试的来源、实验背景、分类和出版状况。我们发现认知表现具有时间和情境的可重复性,平均 估计值在 0.15 到 0.28 之间。可重复性估计值主要受认知表现测量类型和出版状况的影响。我们的研究结果强调了认知在一系列分类群中存在广泛的个体间一致变化,这种变化与行为一样,可能与适应度结果有关。本文是主题为“认知能力个体差异的原因和后果”的一部分。