Chaudhary Rahul, Garg Jalaj, Krishnamoorthy Parasuram, Bliden Kevin, Shah Neeraj, Agarwal Nayan, Gupta Rahul, Sharma Abhishek, Kern Karl B, Patel Nainesh C, Gurbel Paul
Department of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, United States.
Division of Cardiology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA 18103, United States.
World J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;9(12):830-837. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i12.830.
To assess safety and efficacy of early erythropoietin (Epo) administration in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBSCO, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane databases, of all studies published from the inception through October 10, 2016. Inclusion criteria included: (1) Adult humans with OHCA and successful sustained return of spontaneous circulation; and (2) studies including mortality/brain death, acute thrombotic events as their end points. Primary efficacy outcome was "brain death or Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 5". Secondary outcomes were "CPC score 1, and 2-4", "overall thrombotic events" and "acute coronary stent thrombosis".
We analyzed a total of 606 participants ( = 276 received Epo and = 330 with standard of care alone) who experienced OHCA enrolled in 3 clinical trials. No significant difference was observed between the Epo and no Epo group in brain death or CPC score 5 (OR = 0.77; 95%CI: 0.42-1.39), CPC score 1 (OR = 1.16, 95%CI: 0.82-1.64), and CPC score 2-4 (OR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.44-1.36). Epo group was associated with increased thrombotic complications (OR = 2.41, 95%CI: 1.26-4.62) and acute coronary stent thrombosis (OR = 8.16, 95%CI: 1.39-47.99). No publication bias was observed.
Our study demonstrates no improvement in neurological outcomes and increased incidence of thrombotic events and acute coronary stent thrombosis in OHCA patients who were treated with Epo in addition to standard therapy.
评估院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者早期使用促红细胞生成素(Epo)的安全性和有效性。
使用PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、EBSCO、CINAHL、科学引文索引和考科蓝数据库,对从数据库建立至2016年10月10日发表的所有研究进行系统文献检索。纳入标准包括:(1)发生院外心脏骤停且自主循环成功持续恢复的成年患者;(2)以死亡率/脑死亡、急性血栓形成事件作为终点的研究。主要疗效结局为“脑死亡或脑功能分类(CPC)评分为5”。次要结局为“CPC评分为1和2 - 4”、“总体血栓形成事件”和“急性冠状动脉支架血栓形成”。
我们分析了3项临床试验中纳入的总共606名经历院外心脏骤停的参与者(n = 276接受Epo治疗,n = 330仅接受标准治疗)。在脑死亡或CPC评分为5(比值比[OR] = 0.77;95%置信区间[CI]:0.42 - 1.39)、CPC评分为1(OR = 1.16,95%CI:0.82 - 1.64)以及CPC评分为2 - 4(OR = 0.77,95%CI:0.44 - 1.36)方面,Epo组和未使用Epo组之间未观察到显著差异。Epo组与血栓形成并发症增加(OR = 2.41,95%CI:1.26 - 4.62)和急性冠状动脉支架血栓形成(OR = 8.16,95%CI:1.39 - 47.99)相关。未观察到发表偏倚。
我们的研究表明,在接受标准治疗的基础上使用Epo治疗的院外心脏骤停患者,神经学结局未得到改善,血栓形成事件和急性冠状动脉支架血栓形成的发生率增加。