Srinivasyaiah Archana, Nitin Priyanka, Hegde Usha
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS University, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
J Lab Physicians. 2016 Jul-Dec;8(2):106-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.180791.
In routine histopathology, decalcification of teeth is an essential and important step during tissue processing. The present study was attempted to decalcify teeth using microwave method and to compare it with conventional decalcification method.
To compare microwave decalcification with conventional decalcification method with respect to the speed of decalcification, preservation of tissue structure, and efficacy of staining.
A total of 72 single-rooted premolars were used for both conventional and microwave decalcification methods. Three different types of decalcifying agents at 5% and 7% were used. Decalcifying agents included nitric acid, formic acid, and trichloroacetic acid, each at 5% and 7%. About 6 teeth were included in each category and were decalcified by both conventional and microwave method. After decalcification, all the teeth were examined macroscopically and microscopically. Cramer's V-test was used to determine the statistical significance.
The results have shown that microwave method using 5% and 7% nitric acid were the fastest. Structural details and good staining characteristics were better in teeth decalcified by 5% nitric acid and 5% trichloroacetic acid by both the methods.
5% nitric acid by microwave method proved to be the best decalcifying agent as it was fast and gave good structural details and staining characteristics.
在常规组织病理学中,牙齿脱钙是组织处理过程中必不可少且重要的一步。本研究尝试使用微波法对牙齿进行脱钙,并将其与传统脱钙方法进行比较。
从脱钙速度、组织结构保存情况及染色效果方面比较微波脱钙法与传统脱钙法。
共72颗单根前磨牙用于传统脱钙法和微波脱钙法。使用三种不同类型的脱钙剂,浓度分别为5%和7%。脱钙剂包括硝酸、甲酸和三氯乙酸,浓度均为5%和7%。每类约6颗牙齿,分别采用传统方法和微波法进行脱钙。脱钙后,对所有牙齿进行宏观和微观检查。采用克莱默V检验确定统计学意义。
结果表明,使用5%和7%硝酸的微波法脱钙速度最快。两种方法中,用5%硝酸和5%三氯乙酸脱钙的牙齿组织结构细节和染色特性更佳。
微波法使用5%硝酸被证明是最佳脱钙剂,因为它脱钙速度快,能提供良好的组织结构细节和染色特性。