• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰葡萄园本土植物潜在的生态系统服务功能:成果与前景

Potential ecosystem service delivery by endemic plants in New Zealand vineyards: successes and prospects.

作者信息

Shields Morgan W, Tompkins Jean-Marie, Saville David J, Meurk Colin D, Wratten Stephen

机构信息

Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand.

Environment Canterbury, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2016 Jun 22;4:e2042. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2042. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.2042
PMID:27366636
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4924141/
Abstract

Vineyards worldwide occupy over 7 million hectares and are typically virtual monocultures, with high and costly inputs of water and agro-chemicals. Understanding and enhancing ecosystem services can reduce inputs and their costs and help satisfy market demands for evidence of more sustainable practices. In this New Zealand work, low-growing, endemic plant species were evaluated for their potential benefits as Service Providing Units (SPUs) or Ecosystem Service Providers (ESPs). The services provided were weed suppression, conservation of beneficial invertebrates, soil moisture retention and microbial activity. The potential Ecosystem Dis-services (EDS) from the selected plant species by hosting the larvae of a key vine moth pest, the light-brown apple moth (Epiphyas postvittana), was also quantified. Questionnaires were used to evaluate winegrowers' perceptions of the value of and problems associated with such endemic plant species in their vineyards. Growth and survival rates of the 14 plant species, in eight families, were evaluated, with Leptinella dioica (Asteraceae) and Acaena inermis 'purpurea' (Rosaceae) having the highest growth rates in terms of area covered and the highest survival rate after 12 months. All 14 plant species suppressed weeds, with Leptinella squalida, Geranium sessiliforum (Geraniaceae), Hebe chathamica (Plantaginaceae), Scleranthus uniflorus (Caryophyllaceae) and L. dioica, each reducing weed cover by >95%. Plant species also differed in the diversity of arthropods that they supported, with the Shannon Wiener diversity index (H') for these taxa ranging from 0 to 1.3. G. sessiliforum and Muehlenbeckia axillaris (Polygonaceae) had the highest invertebrate diversity. Density of spiders was correlated with arthropod diversity and G. sessiliflorum and H. chathamica had the highest densities of these arthropods. Several plant species associated with higher soil moisture content than in control plots. The best performing species in this context were A. inermis 'purpurea' and Lobelia angulata (Lobeliaceae). Soil beneath all plant species had a higher microbial activity than in control plots, with L. dioica being highest in this respect. Survival proportion to the adult stage of the moth pest, E. postvittana, on all plant species was poor (<0.3). When judged by a ranking combining multiple criteria, the most promising plant species were (in decreasing order) G. sessiliflorum, A. inermis 'purpurea', H. chathamica, M. axillaris, L. dioica, L. angulata, L. squalida and S. uniflorus. Winegrowers surveyed said that they probably would deploy endemic plants around their vines. This research demonstrates that enhancing plant diversity in vineyards can deliver SPUs, harbour ESPs and therefore deliver ES. The data also shows that growers are willing to follow these protocols, with appropriate advice founded on sound research.

摘要

全球葡萄园占地面积超过700万公顷,通常几乎都是单一栽培,需要大量且成本高昂的水和农用化学品投入。了解并增强生态系统服务功能可以减少投入及其成本,并有助于满足市场对更可持续做法证据的需求。在这项新西兰的研究中,对生长低矮的本土植物物种作为服务提供单元(SPU)或生态系统服务提供者(ESP)的潜在益处进行了评估。这些植物提供的服务包括抑制杂草、保护有益无脊椎动物、保持土壤湿度和微生物活性。还对所选植物物种因寄生一种主要葡萄蛾害虫——浅褐苹果蛾(Epiphyas postvittana)的幼虫而可能产生的生态系统负服务(EDS)进行了量化。通过问卷调查来评估葡萄种植者对其葡萄园里此类本土植物物种的价值认知以及与之相关的问题。对8个科的14种植物的生长和存活率进行了评估,就覆盖面积而言,二裂薄雪草(菊科)和无刺紫羊茅‘紫叶’(蔷薇科)的生长速率最高,且在12个月后存活率也最高。所有14种植物都能抑制杂草生长,其中,圆叶薄雪草、无柄老鹳草(牻牛儿苗科)、查塔姆帚石楠(车前科)、单花硬叶藓(石竹科)和二裂薄雪草,每种植物都能使杂草覆盖面积减少95%以上。不同植物物种所支持的节肢动物多样性也有所不同,这些类群的香农-维纳多样性指数(H')在0到1.3之间。无柄老鹳草和腋花多花蓼(蓼科)的无脊椎动物多样性最高。蜘蛛密度与节肢动物多样性相关,无柄老鹳草和查塔姆帚石楠的此类节肢动物密度最高。有几种植物物种所在区域的土壤湿度高于对照地块。在这方面表现最佳的物种是无刺紫羊茅‘紫叶’和有角半边莲(半边莲科)。所有植物物种下方土壤的微生物活性均高于对照地块,在这方面二裂薄雪草表现最为突出。蛾类害虫浅褐苹果蛾在所有植物物种上发育到成虫阶段的存活率都很低(<0.3)。综合多项标准进行排名时,最具潜力的植物物种依次为(从高到低)无柄老鹳草、无刺紫羊茅‘紫叶’、查塔姆帚石楠、腋花多花蓼、二裂薄雪草、有角半边莲、圆叶薄雪草和单花硬叶藓。接受调查的葡萄种植者表示,他们可能会在葡萄藤周围种植本土植物。这项研究表明,增加葡萄园中的植物多样性可以提供服务提供单元,容纳生态系统服务提供者,从而提供生态系统服务。数据还表明,种植者愿意遵循这些方案,并基于可靠研究接受适当建议。

相似文献

1
Potential ecosystem service delivery by endemic plants in New Zealand vineyards: successes and prospects.新西兰葡萄园本土植物潜在的生态系统服务功能:成果与前景
PeerJ. 2016 Jun 22;4:e2042. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2042. eCollection 2016.
2
Effects of native grass cover crops on beneficial and pest invertebrates in Australian vineyards.本土草本覆盖作物对澳大利亚葡萄园有益和有害无脊椎动物的影响。
Environ Entomol. 2010 Jun;39(3):970-8. doi: 10.1603/EN09144.
3
Monitoring Arthropods in Azorean Agroecosystems: the project AGRO-ECOSERVICES.亚速尔群岛农业生态系统中节肢动物的监测:AGRO-ECOSERVICES项目
Biodivers Data J. 2021 Dec 9;9:e77548. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e77548. eCollection 2021.
4
Temporal Patterns in the Abundance and Species Composition of Spiders on Host Plants of the Invasive Moth Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).入侵蛾类苹果小卷叶蛾(鳞翅目:卷蛾科)寄主植物上蜘蛛的数量及物种组成的时间模式
Environ Entomol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):502-510. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvx065.
5
Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis.葡萄园植被管理强度对生物多样性和生态系统服务的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Appl Ecol. 2018 Sep;55(5):2484-2495. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13124. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
6
Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future.作为生物防治剂的昆虫病原体:回归未来。
J Invertebr Pathol. 2015 Nov;132:1-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
7
Habitat management of organic vineyard in Northern Italy: the role of cover plants management on arthropod functional biodiversity.意大利北部有机葡萄园的栖息地管理:覆盖植物管理对节肢动物功能生物多样性的作用。
Bull Entomol Res. 2016 Dec;106(6):759-768. doi: 10.1017/S0007485316000493. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
8
Engineering a plant community to deliver multiple ecosystem services.设计一个能提供多种生态系统服务的植物群落。
Ecol Appl. 2015 Jun;25(4):1034-43. doi: 10.1890/14-1605.1.
9
Worldwide host plants of the highly polyphagous, invasive Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).世界范围内高度多食性、入侵性的 Epiphyas postvittana(鳞翅目:卷蛾科)的寄主植物。
J Econ Entomol. 2011 Oct;104(5):1514-24. doi: 10.1603/ec11160.
10
Effects of vineyard inter-row management on the diversity and abundance of plants and surface-dwelling invertebrates in Central Romania.罗马尼亚中部葡萄园行间管理对植物及地表无脊椎动物多样性和丰度的影响。
J Insect Conserv. 2020;24(1):175-185. doi: 10.1007/s10841-019-00215-0. Epub 2020 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the FAR1-RELATED SEQUENCE (FRS) Gene Family in Grape ( L.).葡萄(Vitis vinifera L.)中FAR1相关序列(FRS)基因家族的全基因组鉴定与表达分析
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 14;26(10):4675. doi: 10.3390/ijms26104675.
2
An ecosystem service approach to the study of vineyard landscapes in the context of climate change: a review.气候变化背景下葡萄园景观研究的生态系统服务方法:综述
Sustain Sci. 2023;18(2):997-1013. doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01223-x. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
3
Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter-rows in different floral kingdoms.

本文引用的文献

1
Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition.土地利用集约化通过生物多样性丧失和功能组成变化改变生态系统多功能性。
Ecol Lett. 2015 Aug;18(8):834-843. doi: 10.1111/ele.12469. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
2
Significance and value of non-traded ecosystem services on farmland.农田非贸易生态系统服务的意义与价值
PeerJ. 2015 Feb 17;3:e762. doi: 10.7717/peerj.762. eCollection 2015.
3
Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-analysis.
提高开花植物功能丰富度可改善不同植物区系葡萄园行间的野生蜜蜂多样性。
Ecol Evol. 2021 May 4;11(12):7927-7945. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7623. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis.葡萄园植被管理强度对生物多样性和生态系统服务的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Appl Ecol. 2018 Sep;55(5):2484-2495. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13124. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
5
Ecological and pest-management implications of sex differences in scarab landing patterns on grape vines.金龟子在葡萄藤上着陆模式的性别差异对生态和害虫管理的影响。
PeerJ. 2017 Apr 27;5:e3213. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3213. eCollection 2017.
土地利用强度与有机农业对生物多样性的影响:一项分层荟萃分析。
J Appl Ecol. 2014 Jun;51(3):746-755. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12219. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
4
Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems.农业系统中的可持续集约化。
Ann Bot. 2014 Dec;114(8):1571-96. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu205. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
5
Agriculture. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies.农业。农业的可持续集约化:前提与政策。
Science. 2013 Jul 5;341(6141):33-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1234485.
6
Climate change, wine, and conservation.气候变化、葡萄酒和保护。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 23;110(17):6907-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210127110. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
7
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.生物多样性丧失及其对人类的影响。
Nature. 2012 Jun 6;486(7401):59-67. doi: 10.1038/nature11148.
8
Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship.生物多样性和生态系统服务:多层次关系。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Jan;27(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
9
Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?管理生态系统服务:我们需要了解它们的生态学哪些方面?
Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):468-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x.
10
The ecosystem-service chain and the biological diversity crisis.生态系统服务链与生物多样性危机。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jan 12;365(1537):31-9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0223.