• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这种诱人的魅力是一种简化的魅力:人们更喜欢包含逻辑上不相关的简化信息的科学解释。

The seductive allure is a reductive allure: People prefer scientific explanations that contain logically irrelevant reductive information.

作者信息

Hopkins Emily J, Weisberg Deena Skolnick, Taylor Jordan C V

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, United States.

University of Pennsylvania, United States.

出版信息

Cognition. 2016 Oct;155:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.011
PMID:27367591
Abstract

Previous work has found that people feel significantly more satisfied with explanations of psychological phenomena when those explanations contain neuroscience information-even when this information is entirely irrelevant to the logic of the explanations. This seductive allure effect was first demonstrated by Weisberg, Keil, Goodstein, Rawson, and Gray (2008), and has since been replicated several times (Fernandez-Duque, Evans, Christian, & Hodges, 2015; Minahan & Siedlecki, 2016; Rhodes, Rodriguez, & Shah, 2014; Weisberg, Taylor, & Hopkins, 2015). However, these studies only examined psychological phenomena. The current study thus investigated the generality of this effect and found that it occurs across several scientific disciplines whenever the explanations include reductive information: reference to smaller components or more fundamental processes. These data suggest that people have a general preference for reductive information, even when it is irrelevant to the logic of an explanation.

摘要

先前的研究发现,当对心理现象的解释包含神经科学信息时,人们会明显更满意——即使这些信息与解释的逻辑完全无关。这种诱人的魅力效应最早由韦斯伯格、凯尔、古德斯坦、罗森和格雷(2008年)证明,此后又被多次重复验证(费尔南德斯-杜克、埃文斯、克里斯蒂安和霍奇斯,2015年;米纳汉和西德莱茨基,2016年;罗兹、罗德里格斯和沙阿,2014年;韦斯伯格、泰勒和霍普金斯,2015年)。然而,这些研究只考察了心理现象。因此,本研究调查了这种效应的普遍性,发现只要解释中包含还原信息:提及更小的组成部分或更基本的过程,这种效应就会在多个科学学科中出现。这些数据表明,人们普遍偏好还原信息,即使它与解释的逻辑无关。

相似文献

1
The seductive allure is a reductive allure: People prefer scientific explanations that contain logically irrelevant reductive information.这种诱人的魅力是一种简化的魅力:人们更喜欢包含逻辑上不相关的简化信息的科学解释。
Cognition. 2016 Oct;155:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
2
Does expertise moderate the seductive allure of reductive explanations?专业知识会缓和简化解释的诱人魅力吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102890. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102890. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
3
The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations.神经科学解释的诱人魅力。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):470-7. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20040.
4
The seductive allure of the brain: Dualism and lay perceptions of neuroscience.大脑的诱人魅力:二元论与神经科学的外行人观念。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2021 May;38(3):205-230. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2021.1976127. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
5
Extending the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations effect to popular articles about educational topics.将神经科学解释效应的诱人魅力延伸到关于教育主题的热门文章中。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2017 Dec;87(4):518-534. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12162. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
Does reductive information increase satisfaction with scientific explanations? Three preregistered tests of the reductive allure effect.还原性信息是否会增加对科学解释的满意度?还原性吸引力效应的三项预先注册测试。
Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105941. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105941. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
7
Neuroscience explanations really do satisfy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the seductive allure of neuroscience.神经科学解释确实令人满意:对神经科学诱人魅力的系统评价与荟萃分析
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Apr;33(3):290-307. doi: 10.1177/09636625231205005. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
8
The seductive allure of technical language and its effect on covid-19 vaccine beliefs and intentions.技术语言的诱人魅力及其对新冠疫苗信念和意愿的影响。
Vaccine. 2021 Dec 20;39(52):7590-7597. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.027. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
9
People's explanatory preferences for scientific phenomena.人们对科学现象的解释偏好。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018 Nov 21;3(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0135-2.
10
The Appeal of the Brain in the Popular Press.大众媒体对大脑的吸引力。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;5(6):762-6. doi: 10.1177/1745691610388779.

引用本文的文献

1
You Understand, So I Understand: How a "Community of Knowledge" Shapes Trust and Credibility in Expert Testimony Evidence.你明白,所以我明白:“知识共同体”如何塑造专家证人证据中的信任和可信度。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 6;15(8):1071. doi: 10.3390/bs15081071.
2
How laypeople evaluate scientific explanations containing jargon.外行人如何评估包含专业术语的科学解释。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02227-0.
3
Replicating the 'seductive allure of neuroscience explanations' effect in a classroom experiment and an online study.
在课堂实验和在线研究中重现“神经科学解释的诱人魅力”效应。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 11;11(12):241120. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241120. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Crowd-counting technology within the Smart City context: understanding, trust, and acceptance.智慧城市背景下的人群计数技术:理解、信任与接受
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 18;15:1423837. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1423837. eCollection 2024.
5
Art therapy and neuroscience: evidence, limits, and myths.艺术疗法与神经科学:证据、局限与误区
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 2;15:1484481. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1484481. eCollection 2024.
6
Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research.人工智能与科研中的理解错觉。
Nature. 2024 Mar;627(8002):49-58. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
7
Biology, Society, or Choice: How Do Non-Experts Interpret Explanations of Behaviour?生物学、社会因素还是个人选择:非专业人士如何解读行为解释?
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Aug 20;7:625-651. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00098. eCollection 2023.
8
Irreducibly Social: Why Biocriminology's Ontoepistemology is Incompatible with the Social Reality of Crime.不可还原的社会性:为何生物犯罪学的本体认识论与犯罪的社会现实不相容。
Theor Criminol. 2023 Feb;27(1):85-104. doi: 10.1177/13624806211073695. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
9
Integrating Philosophy of Understanding With the Cognitive Sciences.将理解哲学与认知科学相结合。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Mar 10;16:764708. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.764708. eCollection 2022.
10
Public misconceptions about dyslexia: The role of intuitive psychology.公众对诵读困难的误解:直觉心理学的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 2;16(12):e0259019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259019. eCollection 2021.