a Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences , Deakin University , Burwood , Australia.
b Centre for Sport Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences , Deakin University , Burwood , Australia.
Res Sports Med. 2016 Jul-Sep;24(3):269-80. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2016.1202828. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
The purpose of the present study was to determine the efficacy of the multi-component training distress scale (MTDS), in monitoring swimmers prior to national competition. Twenty-one national-level adolescent swimmers completed eight weeks of testing. Once a week participants completed an 8 × 50 m sprint test, vertical jump test, sit-and-reach test, the MTDS and the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes (REST-Q). All testing was incorporated into the swimmers' normal training programme. The REST-Q accounted for the following variances in performance: flexibility (14.6%, p = 0.009), power output (17.7%, p = 0.003), swimming speed (15.5%, p = 0.006) and swimming endurance (17.5%, p = 0.002). In comparison, the MTDS accounted for the following variances in performance: flexibility (12.1%, p = 0.095), power output (16.4%, p = 0.023), swimming speed (20.5%, p = 0.003) and swimming speed endurance (23.8%, p = 0.001). The findings of the current study suggest that both the REST-Q Sport and the MTDS have the capacity to predict performance on a range of fitness components associated with swimming.
本研究的目的是确定多组分训练困扰量表(MTDS)在监测参加全国比赛的游泳运动员中的功效。21 名国家级青少年游泳运动员完成了八周的测试。每周一次,参与者完成 8 次 50 米冲刺测试、垂直跳跃测试、坐立伸展测试、MTDS 和运动员恢复压力问卷(REST-Q)。所有测试都纳入了游泳运动员的正常训练计划。REST-Q 解释了以下性能差异:灵活性(14.6%,p=0.009)、功率输出(17.7%,p=0.003)、游泳速度(15.5%,p=0.006)和游泳耐力(17.5%,p=0.002)。相比之下,MTDS 解释了以下性能差异:灵活性(12.1%,p=0.095)、功率输出(16.4%,p=0.023)、游泳速度(20.5%,p=0.003)和游泳速度耐力(23.8%,p=0.001)。本研究的结果表明,REST-Q Sport 和 MTDS 都有能力预测与游泳相关的一系列体能成分的表现。