Suppr超能文献

最终冲洗液对根管封闭剂抗菌活性的影响。

The effect of the final irrigant on the antimicrobial activity of root canal sealers.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Malta, Medical School, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida MSD 2090, Malta.

出版信息

J Dent. 2016 Sep;52:30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Root canal irrigation is an essential step in root canal therapy as it enables the elimination of microorganisms. The final irrigant may affect the properties of the root canal sealer used during obturation particularly with tricalcium silicate-based sealers, which interact with dentine. The aim of this study was to assess the antimicrobial activity of tricalcium silicate-containing sealers in contact with different irrigants. Furthermore the sealer surface in contact with the irrigant was characterized.

METHODOLOGY

The antimicrobial activity of BioRoot RCS, MTA Fillapex and AH Plus in contact with water, ethylenediaminetetracetic acid (EDTA) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was assessed by agar diffusion test and by the intratubular infection test against Enterococcus faecalis. The sealer surface in contact with the three solutions was characterized after 1min contact and also after simulation of in vivo sealer contact with irrigating solution inside a tooth model by grazing angle X-ray diffraction analysis.

RESULTS

Irrigation with EDTA showed the highest antimicrobial properties of the three root canal sealers followed by water without significant differences. The antimicrobial activity of BioRoot RCS was significantly higher than the other sealers after exposition to the three root canal irrigants followed by MTA Fillapex. AH Plus lost its antimicrobial properties after irrigation with water and PBS.

CONCLUSIONS

BioRoot RCS showed the greatest antimicrobial activity. The root canal sealers exerted a higher antimicrobial activity when EDTA was used as final irrigant. PBS may be contraindicated as a final irrigant as it reduces the antimicrobial activity of sealers.

摘要

目的

根管冲洗是根管治疗的重要步骤,因为它可以清除微生物。最终的冲洗液可能会影响在封闭过程中使用的根管封闭剂的特性,尤其是硅酸三钙基封闭剂,它与牙本质相互作用。本研究的目的是评估含有硅酸三钙的封闭剂与不同冲洗液接触时的抗菌活性。此外,还对与冲洗液接触的封闭剂表面进行了表征。

方法

通过琼脂扩散试验和粪肠球菌的管内感染试验,评估 BioRoot RCS、MTA Fillapex 和 AH Plus 在接触水、乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)时的抗菌活性。在与三种溶液接触 1 分钟后,以及通过在牙齿模型内模拟与冲洗液的体内封闭剂接触后,对与三种溶液接触的封闭剂表面进行了 grazing 角 X 射线衍射分析。

结果

EDTA 冲洗具有三种根管封闭剂中最高的抗菌性能,其次是水,但无显著差异。在暴露于三种根管冲洗液后,BioRoot RCS 的抗菌活性明显高于其他两种封闭剂,其次是 MTA Fillapex。AH Plus 在用水和 PBS 冲洗后失去了抗菌性能。

结论

BioRoot RCS 显示出最大的抗菌活性。当 EDTA 用作最终冲洗液时,根管封闭剂表现出更高的抗菌活性。PBS 可能不适合作为最终冲洗液,因为它会降低封闭剂的抗菌活性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验