Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Aug;28(8):1013-1021. doi: 10.1111/clr.12914. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
Current decontamination methods of titanium (Ti) implant present limited success in achieving predictable re-osseointegration. We hypothesized that even though these techniques could be useful in elimination of bacteria, they might be unsuccessful in removing organic contaminants and restoring the original surface composition. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of four decontamination methods on the surface chemistry and bacterial load of biofilm-contaminated implant surfaces in order to improve implant surface decontamination.
The ability of clinically available methods such as metal and plastic curettes, Ti brushes and Er: YAG laser to decontaminate Ti implant surfaces was assessed. Surface morphology, chemical composition and properties of machined Ti discs (Ø 5.0 and 1.0 mm thick) were analysed before and after oral biofilm contamination using scanning electron microscope and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The presence and viability of bacteria were evaluated with live-dead assays.
Biofilm contamination created an organic layer rich in hydrocarbons and bacteria that covered entirely the Ti surfaces. This organic layer has tightly adhered to Ti surfaces and could not be completely removed with any of the methods assessed. Ti brushes achieved greater elimination of organic contaminants and bacteria than curettes and Er: YAG laser; however, none of them was able to restore the original surface chemistry. Alternatively, Er: YAG laser-treated surfaces showed the lowest live-to-dead bacterial ratio.
Ti brushes were more effective than curettes (metal or plastic) and Er: YAG laser in decontaminating Ti implant surfaces, although none of these techniques was able to completely eliminate surface contamination. Er: YAG laser was more effective than curettes and Ti brushes in killing the biofilm bacteria.
目前钛(Ti)种植体的去污方法在实现可预测的再骨整合方面效果有限。我们假设,尽管这些技术在消除细菌方面可能有用,但它们可能无法去除有机污染物并恢复原始表面成分。本研究旨在评估四种去污方法对生物膜污染种植体表面的表面化学和细菌负荷的影响,以改善种植体表面去污效果。
评估了临床可用方法(如金属和塑料刮匙、Ti 刷和 Er:YAG 激光)对 Ti 种植体表面去污的能力。使用扫描电子显微镜和 X 射线光电子能谱分析经口腔生物膜污染前后 Ø5.0 和 1.0mm 厚的加工 Ti 圆盘的表面形貌、化学成分和性能。使用活死检测评估细菌的存在和活力。
生物膜污染形成了一层富含碳氢化合物和细菌的有机层,完全覆盖了 Ti 表面。这层有机物紧密附着在 Ti 表面上,用评估的任何方法都无法完全去除。Ti 刷比刮匙和 Er:YAG 激光更能去除有机污染物和细菌;然而,它们都无法恢复原始的表面化学。相比之下,Er:YAG 激光处理的表面显示出最低的活菌与死菌比值。
Ti 刷比刮匙(金属或塑料)和 Er:YAG 激光更有效地清洁 Ti 种植体表面,尽管这些技术都无法完全去除表面污染。Er:YAG 激光比刮匙和 Ti 刷更有效地杀死生物膜细菌。