Morata Thais C, Meinke Deanna
Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1190 Tusculum Avenue/ MS C27, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA, (001-513)533-8487.
Audiology and Speech-Language Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, (001-970)351.1600,
Acoust Aust. 2016 Apr;44(1):67-75. doi: 10.1007/s40857-016-0044-9. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
Occupational health agencies, researchers and policy makers have recognized the need for evidence on the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce or prevent workplace injuries and illnesses. While many workplaces comply with legal or obligatory requirements and implement recommended interventions, few publications exist documenting the effectiveness of these actions. Additionally, some workplaces have discovered through their own processes, novel ways to reduce the risk of injury. Peer-reviewed information on the effectiveness of the many strategies and approaches currently in use could help correct weaknesses, or further encourage their adoption and expansion. The evaluation of intervention effectiveness would certainly contribute to improved worker health and safety. This need is particularly relevant regarding noise exposure in the workplace and hearing loss prevention interventions. In a 2006 review of the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Hearing Loss Research Program, the independent National Academies of Sciences recommended that NIOSH place greater emphasis on identifying the effectiveness of hearing loss prevention measures on the basis of outcomes that are as closely related as possible to reducing noise exposure and work related hearing loss (http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11721). NIOSH used two different approaches to address that recommendation: the first one was to conduct research, including broad systematic reviews on the effectiveness of interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss. The second was to create an award program, the Safe-In-Sound Excellence in Hearing Loss Prevention Award™, to identify and honor excellent real-world examples of noise control and other hearing loss prevention practices and innovations.
职业健康机构、研究人员和政策制定者已经认识到,需要有证据证明旨在减少或预防工作场所伤害和疾病的干预措施的有效性。虽然许多工作场所遵守法律或强制性要求并实施推荐的干预措施,但记录这些行动有效性的出版物却很少。此外,一些工作场所通过自身流程发现了降低受伤风险的新方法。关于目前正在使用的许多策略和方法有效性的同行评审信息,有助于纠正不足之处,或进一步鼓励采用和推广这些方法。对干预措施有效性的评估肯定有助于改善工人的健康和安全。这一需求在工作场所噪声暴露和听力损失预防干预方面尤为重要。在2006年对美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)听力损失研究项目的一项综述中,独立的美国国家科学院建议NIOSH更加注重根据与减少噪声暴露和与工作相关的听力损失尽可能密切相关的结果,确定听力损失预防措施的有效性(http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11721)。NIOSH采用了两种不同的方法来落实这一建议:第一种是开展研究,包括对预防职业性噪声性听力损失干预措施有效性进行广泛的系统综述。第二种是设立一个奖励计划,即“听力损失预防安全卓越奖”™,以识别和表彰噪声控制及其他听力损失预防实践与创新方面的优秀实际案例。