Changjie Guan, Xusheng Zhu, Feng He, Shuguang Qin, Jianwen Li, Junzhou Fu
Department of Nephrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Jan;49(1):133-141. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1359-z. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
Performance of equations in elderly with chronic kidney disease (CKD) was debated. We aimed to access the performances of estimating equations for glomerular filtration rate in Chinese elderly population with chronic kidney disease.
Participants [N = 218, median age, 82 (range 75-96)] with CKD underwent renal dynamic imaging using technetium-99m diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA). The performances of glomerular filtration rate equations including the Cockcroft-Gault equation, the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) equation for Chinese, 3 CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equations, and 2 BIS (Berlin Initiative Study) equations were compared.
Median mGFR was 47.62 (3.00-135.00) ml/min/1.73 m. Smaller biases were shown in BIS-2 equation and CKD-EPI-Cr equation (0.63 ml/min/1.73 m and -1.22 ml/min/1.73 m). Interquartile range of the differences was least with BIS-2 equation and CKD-EPI-Cr-Cys equation (4.36 ml/min/1.73 m and 9.17 ml/min/1.73 m). For accuracy (percentage of eGFR within 30 % of the mGFR, P30), performance of BIS-2, CKD-EPI-Cr-Cys, and BIS-1 equation was superior (94.50, 89.91, and 88.53 %, respectively). In terms of accuracy (root-mean-square error, RMSE), BIS-2 equation, CKD-EPI-Cr-Cys equation, and BIS-1 equation also performed better (7.21 ml/min/1.73 m, 8.87 ml/min/1.73 m and 9.82 ml/min/1.73 m). GFR category misclassification rates were smaller in BIS-2 equation, CKD-EPI-Cr-Cys equation and BIS-1 equation (16.51, 20.64, and 25.69 %, respectively).
Compared with other equations, the BIS-2 equation performed better in the estimation of glomerular filtration rate for Chinese elderly with CKD aged 75 or above.
探讨用于慢性肾脏病(CKD)老年患者的公式的性能。我们旨在评估中国老年CKD人群中肾小球滤过率估算公式的性能。
218例CKD患者[年龄中位数82岁(范围75 - 96岁)]接受了用锝-99m二乙三胺五乙酸(99mTc-DTPA)进行的肾动态显像。比较了包括Cockcroft-Gault公式、中国版肾脏病饮食改良(MDRD)公式、3个慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)公式和2个柏林倡议研究(BIS)公式在内的肾小球滤过率公式的性能。
平均肾小球滤过率(mGFR)为47.62(3.00 - 135.00)ml/min/1.73m²。BIS-2公式和CKD-EPI-Cr公式的偏差较小(分别为0.63ml/min/1.73m²和 - 1.22ml/min/1.73m²)。BIS-2公式和CKD-EPI-Cr-Cys公式的差异四分位间距最小(分别为4.36ml/min/1.73m²和9.17ml/min/1.73m²)。在准确性方面(估算肾小球滤过率[eGFR]在mGFR的30%范围内的百分比,P30),BIS-2、CKD-EPI-Cr-Cys和BIS-1公式的性能更优(分别为94.50%、89.91%和88.53%)。在准确性(均方根误差,RMSE)方面,BIS-2公式、CKD-EPI-Cr-Cys公式和BIS-1公式也表现更好(分别为7.21ml/min/1.73m²、8.87ml/min/1.73m²和9.82ml/min/1.73m²)。BIS-2公式、CKD-EPI-Cr-Cys公式和BIS-1公式的肾小球滤过率类别错误分类率较小(分别为16.51%、20.64%和25.69%)。
与其他公式相比,BIS-2公式在估算75岁及以上中国老年CKD患者的肾小球滤过率方面表现更佳。