Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Hospital, PO Box 10400, 8000, Zwolle, GK, The Netherlands.
MIRA: Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 Apr;25(2):419-428. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0571-7. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
Correction of motion has become feasible on cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT)-based SPECT cameras during myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Our aim was to quantify the motion and to determine the value of automatic correction using commercially available software.
We retrospectively included 83 consecutive patients who underwent stress-rest MPI CZT-SPECT and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. Eight-minute stress acquisitions were reformatted into 1.0- and 20-second bins to detect respiratory motion (RM) and patient motion (PM), respectively. RM and PM were quantified and scans were automatically corrected. Total perfusion deficit (TPD) and SPECT interpretation-normal, equivocal, or abnormal-were compared between the noncorrected and corrected scans. Scans with a changed SPECT interpretation were compared with FFR, the reference standard. Average RM was 2.5 ± 0.4 mm and maximal PM was 4.5 ± 1.3 mm. RM correction influenced the diagnostic outcomes in two patients based on TPD changes ≥7% and in nine patients based on changed visual interpretation. In only four of these patients, the changed SPECT interpretation corresponded with FFR measurements. Correction for PM did not influence the diagnostic outcomes.
Respiratory motion and patient motion were small. Motion correction did not appear to improve the diagnostic outcome and, hence, the added value seems limited in MPI using CZT-based SPECT cameras.
在基于碲锌镉(CZT)的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)相机上进行心肌灌注成像(MPI)时,已经可以进行运动校正。我们的目的是量化运动并确定使用商业上可用的软件进行自动校正的价值。
我们回顾性地纳入了 83 例连续接受应激-静息 MPI CZT-SPECT 和有创性血流储备分数(FFR)测量的患者。8 分钟的应激采集分别重新格式化为 1.0 秒和 20 秒的 bin,以分别检测呼吸运动(RM)和患者运动(PM)。量化 RM 和 PM,并对扫描进行自动校正。比较未校正和校正扫描之间的总灌注缺损(TPD)和 SPECT 解释-正常、不确定或异常。与参考标准 FFR 相比,比较 SPECT 解释改变的扫描。平均 RM 为 2.5±0.4mm,最大 PM 为 4.5±1.3mm。RM 校正根据 TPD 变化≥7%影响了两名患者的诊断结果,根据视觉解释改变影响了 9 名患者的诊断结果。在这些患者中,只有 4 名患者的 SPECT 解释改变与 FFR 测量值相对应。PM 的校正并未影响诊断结果。
呼吸运动和患者运动很小。运动校正似乎并未改善诊断结果,因此在基于 CZT 的 SPECT 相机进行 MPI 时,其附加价值似乎有限。