Cichocki Paweł, Błaszczyk Michał, Cygulska Kamila, Filipczak Krzysztof, Adamczewski Zbigniew, Kuśmierek Jacek, Lipiec Piotr, Kasprzak Jarosław Damian, Płachcińska Anna
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, 92-216 Lodz, Poland.
Department of Quality Control and Radiological Protection, Medical University of Lodz, 92-216 Lodz, Poland.
J Pers Med. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):1164. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111164.
Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and flow reserve (MFR) examination, especially useful in the diagnosis of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), can be assessed with a cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) SPECT gamma camera, as an alternative to the expensive and less available PET. However, study processing is not free from subjective factors. Therefore, this paper aims to evaluate intra- and interobserver repeatability of MBF and MFR values obtained by the same operator and two independent operators.
This study included 57 adult patients. MBF and MFR were assessed using a Discovery NM530c camera in a two-day, rest/dipyridamople protocol, using Tc-MIBI. Data were processed using Corridor4DM software, twice by one operator and once by another operator.
The repeatability of the assessed values was quite good in the whole myocardium, LAD and LCX vascular territories, but was poor in the RCA territory.
The poor repeatability of MBF and MFR in RCA vascular territory can be explained by poor automatic orientation of the heart axis during post-processing and a so-called "cardiac creep" phenomenon. Better automatic heart orientation and introduction of automatic motion correction is likely to drastically improve this repeatability. In the present state of the software, PET is better for patients requiring assessment of MFR in the RCA territory.
心肌血流量(MBF)和血流储备(MFR)检查在多支冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的诊断中特别有用,可使用碲化镉锌(CZT)单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)伽马相机进行评估,作为昂贵且难以获得的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)的替代方法。然而,研究处理并非不受主观因素影响。因此,本文旨在评估由同一操作人员和两名独立操作人员获得的MBF和MFR值在观察者内部和观察者之间的可重复性。
本研究纳入了57名成年患者。使用Discovery NM530c相机,采用两日静息/双嘧达莫方案,使用锝-甲氧基异丁基异腈(Tc-MIBI)评估MBF和MFR。数据使用Corridor4DM软件进行处理,一名操作人员处理两次,另一名操作人员处理一次。
在整个心肌、左前降支(LAD)和左旋支(LCX)血管区域,评估值的可重复性相当好,但在右冠状动脉(RCA)区域较差。
RCA血管区域MBF和MFR的可重复性差可通过后处理过程中心脏轴自动定位不佳以及所谓的“心脏蠕动”现象来解释。更好的心脏自动定位和引入自动运动校正可能会大幅提高这种可重复性。在软件的当前状态下,对于需要评估RCA区域MFR的患者,PET更好。