• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项 fMRI 和有效连接研究,旨在调查在利用人类和机器代理的建议时出现的错误。

An fMRI and effective connectivity study investigating miss errors during advice utilization from human and machine agents.

机构信息

a Molecular Neuroscience Department , George Mason University , Fairfax , VA , USA.

b Department of Psychology , George Mason University , Fairfax , VA , USA.

出版信息

Soc Neurosci. 2017 Oct;12(5):570-581. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1205131. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1080/17470919.2016.1205131
PMID:27409387
Abstract

As society becomes more reliant on machines and automation, understanding how people utilize advice is a necessary endeavor. Our objective was to reveal the underlying neural associations during advice utilization from expert human and machine agents with fMRI and multivariate Granger causality analysis. During an X-ray luggage-screening task, participants accepted or rejected good or bad advice from either the human or machine agent framed as experts with manipulated reliability (high miss rate). We showed that the machine-agent group decreased their advice utilization compared to the human-agent group and these differences in behaviors during advice utilization could be accounted for by high expectations of reliable advice and changes in attention allocation due to miss errors. Brain areas involved with the salience and mentalizing networks, as well as sensory processing involved with attention, were recruited during the task and the advice utilization network consisted of attentional modulation of sensory information with the lingual gyrus as the driver during the decision phase and the fusiform gyrus as the driver during the feedback phase. Our findings expand on the existing literature by showing that misses degrade advice utilization, which is represented in a neural network involving salience detection and self-processing with perceptual integration.

摘要

随着社会越来越依赖机器和自动化,了解人们如何利用建议是一项必要的工作。我们的目标是通过 fMRI 和多元 Granger 因果分析揭示从人类和机器专家代理中利用建议时的潜在神经关联。在 X 射线行李安检任务中,参与者接受或拒绝来自人类或机器代理的好或坏的建议,这些代理被框定为具有操纵可靠性(高错误率)的专家。我们表明,与人类代理组相比,机器代理组减少了建议的利用,而这些在建议利用过程中的行为差异可以通过对可靠建议的高期望和由于错误而导致的注意力分配变化来解释。在任务期间涉及突显和心理化网络的大脑区域以及与注意力相关的感觉处理被招募,并且建议利用网络包括在决策阶段以舌回为驱动的感觉信息的注意力调制,以及在反馈阶段以梭状回为驱动的感觉信息的注意力调制。我们的发现通过表明错误会降低建议的利用,从而扩展了现有的文献,这一利用在涉及突显检测和自我处理以及感知整合的神经网络中得到体现。

相似文献

1
An fMRI and effective connectivity study investigating miss errors during advice utilization from human and machine agents.一项 fMRI 和有效连接研究,旨在调查在利用人类和机器代理的建议时出现的错误。
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Oct;12(5):570-581. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1205131. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
2
Advice Taking from Humans and Machines: An fMRI and Effective Connectivity Study.来自人类和机器的建议采纳:一项功能磁共振成像和有效连接性研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 4;10:542. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00542. eCollection 2016.
3
Effective connectivity of brain regions underlying third-party punishment: Functional MRI and Granger causality evidence.第三方惩罚背后脑区的有效连接性:功能磁共振成像和格兰杰因果关系证据
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Apr;12(2):124-134. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1153518. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
4
Diffusion of responsibility attenuates altruistic punishment: A functional magnetic resonance imaging effective connectivity study.责任分散削弱利他惩罚:一项功能磁共振成像有效连接性研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Feb;37(2):663-77. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23057. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
5
Interactions Among the Brain Default-Mode, Salience, and Central-Executive Networks During Perceptual Decision-Making of Moving Dots.移动点知觉决策过程中大脑默认模式、突显网络和中央执行网络之间的相互作用
Brain Connect. 2016 Apr;6(3):249-54. doi: 10.1089/brain.2015.0379. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
6
Mentalizing in schizophrenia: A multivariate functional MRI study.精神分裂症中的心理化:一项多变量功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
7
Changes in intrinsic functional connectivity and group relevant salience: The case of sport rivalry.内在功能连接性和群体相关显著性的变化:以体育竞赛为例。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Aug 14;332:126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.04.045. Epub 2017 May 6.
8
Altered intrinsic organisation of brain networks implicated in attentional processes in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a resting-state study of attention, default mode and salience network connectivity.成人注意力缺陷多动障碍中涉及注意力过程的脑网络内在组织改变:一项关于注意力、默认模式和突显网络连接性的静息态研究
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jun;266(4):349-57. doi: 10.1007/s00406-015-0630-0. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
9
Differentiating the functional contributions of resting connectivity networks to memory decision-making: fMRI support for multistage control processes.区分静息态连接网络对记忆决策的功能贡献:功能磁共振成像对多阶段控制过程的支持
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Aug;27(8):1617-32. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00808. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
10
The Salience Network and Its Functional Architecture in a Perceptual Decision: An Effective Connectivity Study.感知决策中的突显网络及其功能架构:一项有效连接性研究
Brain Connect. 2015 Aug;5(6):362-70. doi: 10.1089/brain.2014.0282. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the role of AI explanations in lay individuals' comprehension of radiology reports: A metacognition lens.从元认知视角探究人工智能解释在普通个体理解放射学报告中的作用
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 10;20(9):e0321342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321342. eCollection 2025.
2
Public attitudes on performance for algorithmic and human decision-makers.公众对算法决策者和人类决策者表现的态度。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Dec 10;3(12):pgae520. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae520. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Misleading Robot Signals in a Classification Task Induce Cognitive Load as Measured by Theta Synchronization Between Frontal and Temporo-parietal Brain Regions.
分类任务中具有误导性的机器人信号会引发认知负荷,这一负荷可通过额叶与颞顶叶脑区之间的θ波同步来衡量。
Front Neuroergon. 2022 Jul 1;3:838136. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2022.838136. eCollection 2022.
4
Neural Correlates of Trust in Automation: Considerations and Generalizability Between Technology Domains.自动化信任的神经关联:技术领域之间的考量与可推广性
Front Neuroergon. 2021 Sep 3;2:731327. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2021.731327. eCollection 2021.
5
Human-robot collaborative task planning using anticipatory brain responses.使用预期脑反应进行人机协作任务规划。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 11;18(7):e0287958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287958. eCollection 2023.
6
Noninvasive Characterization of Functional Pathways in Layer-Specific Microcircuits of the Human Brain Using 7T fMRI.使用7T功能磁共振成像对人类大脑层特异性微回路中的功能通路进行无创表征
Brain Sci. 2022 Oct 7;12(10):1361. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101361.
7
Brain mechanisms of automated conflict avoidance simulator supervision.自动冲突回避模拟器监督的大脑机制。
Psychophysiology. 2023 Feb;60(2):e14171. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14171. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
8
Measurement of Trust in Automation: A Narrative Review and Reference Guide.自动化信任度的测量:叙述性综述与参考指南。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 19;12:604977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604977. eCollection 2021.
9
I, robot: depression plays different roles in human-human and human-robot interactions.我,机器人:抑郁在人际互动和人机互动中扮演着不同的角色。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 21;11(1):438. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01567-5.
10
Investigating the Correspondence of Clinical Diagnostic Grouping With Underlying Neurobiological and Phenotypic Clusters Using Unsupervised Machine Learning.使用无监督机器学习研究临床诊断分组与潜在神经生物学及表型聚类之间的对应关系。
Front Appl Math Stat. 2018 Sep;4. doi: 10.3389/fams.2018.00025. Epub 2018 Sep 25.