Montresor Silvio, Picart Pascal
Opt Express. 2016 Jun 27;24(13):14322-43. doi: 10.1364/OE.24.014322.
This paper discusses on a quantitative comparison of the performances of different advanced algorithms for phase data de-noising. In order to quantify the performances, several criteria are proposed: the gain in the signal-to-noise ratio, the Q index, the standard deviation of the phase error, and the signal to distortion ratio. The proposed methodology to investigate de-noising algorithms is based on the use of a realistic simulation of noise-corrupted phase data. A database including 25 fringe patterns divided into 5 patterns and 5 different signal-to-noise ratios was generated to evaluate the selected de-noising algorithms. A total of 34 algorithms divided into different families were evaluated. Quantitative appraisal leads to ranking within the considered criteria. A fairly good correlation between the signal-to-noise ratio gain and the quality index has been observed. There exists an anti-correlation between the phase error and the quality index which indicates that the phase errors are mainly structural distortions in the fringe pattern. Experimental results are thoroughly discussed in the paper.
本文讨论了不同先进算法在相位数据去噪性能方面的定量比较。为了量化性能,提出了几个标准:信噪比增益、Q指数、相位误差的标准差以及信号与失真比。所提出的研究去噪算法的方法基于对噪声干扰的相位数据进行逼真模拟。生成了一个包含25个条纹图案的数据库,这些图案分为5种图案和5种不同的信噪比,以评估所选的去噪算法。总共评估了34种分为不同类别的算法。定量评估得出了在所考虑标准内的排名。已观察到信噪比增益与质量指数之间有相当好的相关性。相位误差与质量指数之间存在反相关性,这表明相位误差主要是条纹图案中的结构失真。本文对实验结果进行了深入讨论。