Suppr超能文献

Comparison of nonisotopic and radioimmunoassay techniques for digoxin: a study based on external quality assurance measurements.

作者信息

Wilson J F, Tsanaclis L M, Williams J, Tedstone J E, Richens A

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, U.K.

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 1989;11(4):477-9.

PMID:2741197
Abstract

A comparison of the precision and accuracy of three nonisotopic and of radioimmunoassay (RIA) techniques for digoxin was made using data from 141 samples of spiked human serum assayed between 1984 and 1987 by members of the Heathcontrol external quality assurance scheme. There were significant differences between techniques in the number of observations rejected as outliers greater than 3 SD from the sample mean, the percentages of rejected measurements being Abbott TDX 1.4, RIA 3.3, Ames TDA 4.2, and Syva EMIT 6.3. Ames TDA and Syva EMIT were shown to have a significantly lower precision than the other techniques in measurements of digoxin concentrations less than 1 nmol/L. A significant 4% negative bias was observed for Ames TDA measurements of digoxin concentrations between 1 and 2.6 nmol/L. A concentration-related bias was demonstrated for Abbott TDX measurements that varied from 14% overestimates at concentrations less than 1 nmol/L to 6.7% underestimates of digoxin at concentrations greater than 2.6 nmol/L.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验