Thompson Joshua P, Thompson Dennis F
Southwestern Oklahoma State University, Weatherford, OK, USA.
Southwestern Oklahoma State University, Weatherford, OK, USA
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Oct;50(10):882-91. doi: 10.1177/1060028016659077. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
To provide a systematic review of the current role of nebulized fentanyl in acute pain and potentially other conditions.
A MEDLINE literature search inclusive of the dates 1946 to May 2016 was performed using the following search terms: fentanyl and administration, inhaled Excerpta Medica was searched from 1980 to May 2016 using the following search terms: exp fentanyl/inhalation drug administration Additionally, Web of Science was searched using the terms fentanyl and pain inclusive of 1945 to May 2016.
We utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to select English language, human primary literature, review articles, and supporting data assessing the efficacy of nebulized fentanyl in acute pain.
Seven clinical trials have demonstrated no difference in efficacy between nebulized fentanyl and intravenous (IV) opioids. Few adverse effects were reported; however, the trials were of short duration. Nebulized fentanyl appeared to be a rapid-acting analgesic that does not require IV access.
Evidence suggests that nebulized fentanyl is as effective as IV opioids in the treatment of acute pain, with relatively few adverse effects. However, questions remain about the extemporaneous preparation of fentanyl nebulized solution, the variability in nebulization devices, and ensuring consistent drug delivery to distal airways in the clinical setting. The abuse potential of nebulized fentanyl should also be considered.
对雾化芬太尼在急性疼痛及可能的其他病症中的当前作用进行系统评价。
使用以下检索词对1946年至2016年5月期间的MEDLINE文献进行检索:芬太尼与给药、吸入。使用以下检索词对1980年至2016年5月期间的《医学文摘》进行检索:芬太尼/吸入给药。此外,使用芬太尼与疼痛相关检索词对1945年至2016年5月期间的科学网进行检索。
我们采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,选择英文、人类原发性文献、综述文章以及评估雾化芬太尼治疗急性疼痛疗效的支持性数据。
七项临床试验表明,雾化芬太尼与静脉注射(IV)阿片类药物在疗效上无差异。报告的不良反应较少;然而,这些试验持续时间较短。雾化芬太尼似乎是一种速效镇痛药,无需静脉通路。
有证据表明,雾化芬太尼在治疗急性疼痛方面与静脉注射阿片类药物同样有效,且不良反应相对较少。然而,关于芬太尼雾化溶液的临时配制、雾化装置的变异性以及在临床环境中确保药物一致地输送至远端气道等问题仍然存在。还应考虑雾化芬太尼的滥用可能性。