• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜或开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌后的10年肿瘤学结局

10-Year Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic or Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.

作者信息

Allaix Marco E, Giraudo Giuseppe, Ferrarese Alessia, Arezzo Alberto, Rebecchi Fabrizio, Morino Mario

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2016 Dec;40(12):3052-3062. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3631-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-016-3631-x
PMID:27417110
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Only few studies have compared laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) and open total mesorectal excision (OTME) for rectal cancer with follow-up longer than 5 years. The aim of this study was to compare 10-year oncologic outcomes after LTME and OTME for nonmetastatic rectal cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of rectal cancer patients undergoing LTME or OTME. Statistical analyses were performed on an ''intention-to-treat'' basis and by actual treatment. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared by using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of poor survival.

RESULTS

Between April 1994 and August 2005, a total of 153 LTME patients and 154 OTME patients were included. Similarly, 10-year OS and DFS after LTME and OTME were observed: 76.8 versus 70.6 % (P = 0.138) and 69.1 versus 67.6 % (P = 0.508), respectively. Conversion to OTME did not adversely affect OS and DFS. Stage-by-stage comparison showed no significant differences between LTME and OTME. No significant differences were observed in local recurrence rates after LTME and OTME (6.5 vs. 7.8 %, P = 0.837). Median time until local recurrence was 24.5 (range, 12-56) months after LTME and 22 (6-64) months after OTME (P = 0.777). Poor tumor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and a lymph node ratio of 0.25 or more were the independent predictors of poorer OS and DFS.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study with long follow-up did not show significant differences between the two groups in OS and DFS.

摘要

背景

仅有少数研究比较了腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术(LTME)和开放全直肠系膜切除术(OTME)治疗直肠癌且随访时间超过5年的情况。本研究的目的是比较LTME和OTME治疗非转移性直肠癌后的10年肿瘤学结局。

方法

我们对接受LTME或OTME的直肠癌患者的前瞻性数据库进行了回顾性分析。基于“意向性治疗”原则并按实际治疗情况进行统计分析。采用Kaplan-Meier法比较总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。进行多变量分析以确定生存不良的预测因素。

结果

1994年4月至2005年8月期间,共纳入153例LTME患者和154例OTME患者。同样,观察到LTME和OTME后的10年OS和DFS:分别为76.8%对70.6%(P = 0.138)和69.1%对67.6%(P = 0.508)。转为OTME对OS和DFS没有不利影响。逐阶段比较显示LTME和OTME之间无显著差异。LTME和OTME后的局部复发率无显著差异(6.5%对7.8%,P = 0.837)。LTME后至局部复发的中位时间为24.5(范围12 - 56)个月,OTME后为22(6 - 64)个月(P = 0.777)。肿瘤分化差、淋巴管侵犯以及淋巴结比率为0.25或更高是OS和DFS较差的独立预测因素。

结论

这项长期随访的回顾性研究未显示两组在OS和DFS方面存在显著差异。

相似文献

1
10-Year Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic or Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.腹腔镜或开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌后的10年肿瘤学结局
World J Surg. 2016 Dec;40(12):3052-3062. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3631-x.
2
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a nonrandomized comparative prospective trial in a tertiary center in Mexico City.腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术:墨西哥城一家三级中心的非随机对照前瞻性试验
Am Surg. 2009 Jan;75(1):33-8.
3
Laparoscopic vs. open total mesorectal excision for treatment of rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的比较
Rev Invest Clin. 2008 May-Jun;60(3):205-11.
4
[Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for the middle-lower rectal cancer: a clinical comparative study].腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的临床对比研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;12(6):573-6.
5
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of results of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌:随机对照试验结果的Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Sep;22(7):674-84. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0143. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
6
The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.环周切缘状态:机器人辅助、腹腔镜及开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的比较
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;42(6):808-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
7
Long-term outcome of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的长期疗效
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010 Dec;19(6):329-39. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2010.527771.
8
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a case-control study.腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术:一项病例对照研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005 Sep;20(5):428-33. doi: 10.1007/s00384-004-0715-0. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
9
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 15;2014(4):CD005200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005200.pub3.
10
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD005200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005200.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopy is non-inferior to open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的非劣效性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(13):e7363. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7363.
2
Risk factors affecting oncological outcomes of surgical resections for middle and lower rectal cancer.影响中低位直肠癌手术切除肿瘤学结局的危险因素。
Turk J Surg. 2023 Sep 27;39(3):197-203. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.5946. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Applying interpretable machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors for permanent stoma in patients after TME.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放手术切除直肠癌对病理结局的影响:ALA-CART 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1356-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009.
2
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助切除术与开放性切除术治疗Ⅱ期或Ⅲ期直肠癌对病理结果的影响:美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组Z6051随机临床试验
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1346-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529.
3
Multicenter Analysis of Long-Term Oncologic Impact of Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group.
应用可解释的机器学习算法预测全直肠系膜切除术后患者永久性造口的危险因素。
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 24;10:1125875. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1125875. eCollection 2023.
4
The Multidisciplinary Approach of Rectal Cancer: The Experience of "COMRE Group" Model.直肠癌的多学科治疗方法:“COMRE 组”模式的经验
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 28;12(7):1571. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071571.
5
Similarities and differences between study designs in short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, case-matched, and cohort studies.腹腔镜与开放直肠癌低位前切除术短期和长期结局研究设计的异同:一项对随机、病例匹配和队列研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Nov 21;5(2):183-193. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12409. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Use of a simplified consent form to facilitate patient understanding of informed consent for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.使用简化同意书以促进患者对腹腔镜胆囊切除术知情同意的理解。
Open Med (Wars). 2016 Dec 16;11(1):564-573. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0092. eCollection 2016.
7
Excellence and safety in surgery require excellent and safe tutoring.手术的卓越与安全需要出色且安全的指导。
Open Med (Wars). 2016 Dec 25;11(1):518-522. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0089. eCollection 2016.
8
Self-gripping mesh versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized prospective clinical trial in young and elderly patients.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中自固定补片与纤维蛋白胶固定的比较:一项针对年轻和老年患者的随机前瞻性临床试验
Open Med (Wars). 2016 Nov 26;11(1):497-508. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0087. eCollection 2016.
9
The learning curve of laparoscopic holecystectomy in general surgery resident training: old age of the patient may be a risk factor?普通外科住院医师培训中腹腔镜胆囊切除术的学习曲线:患者高龄可能是一个风险因素?
Open Med (Wars). 2016 Nov 26;11(1):489-496. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0086. eCollection 2016.
10
Learning curve for endorectal ultrasound in young and elderly: lights and shades.年轻和老年患者直肠内超声检查的学习曲线:利弊
Open Med (Wars). 2016 Nov 19;11(1):418-425. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0074. eCollection 2016.
腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术后吻合口漏的长期肿瘤学影响多中心分析:韩国腹腔镜结直肠手术研究组
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(29):e1202. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001202.
4
A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的随机对照研究。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.
5
Oncological outcome following anastomotic leak in rectal surgery.直肠手术后吻合口漏的肿瘤学结果。
Br J Surg. 2015 Mar;102(4):416-22. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9748. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
6
Anastomotic leakage is associated with impaired overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis.吻合口漏与根治性直肠癌切除术后总体生存率和无病生存率受损相关:一项倾向评分分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):2059-67. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4187-3. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
Postoperative peritoneal infection enhances migration and invasion capacities of tumor cells in vitro: an insight into the association between anastomotic leak and recurrence after surgery for colorectal cancer.术后腹膜感染增强了肿瘤细胞体外迁移和侵袭能力:结直肠癌手术后吻合口漏与复发的关联探讨。
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):939-43; discussion 943-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000958.
8
Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:与腹腔镜手术的短期疗效比较。
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):221-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000865.
9
Laparoscopy for rectal cancer is oncologically adequate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.腹腔镜直肠癌手术在肿瘤学上是充分的:一项系统综述和文献荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2015 Feb;29(2):334-48. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3686-4. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
10
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: long-term results of a 18-year single-centre experience.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗腹膜外直肠癌:18年单中心经验的长期结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):796-807. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2441-9. Epub 2014 Jan 18.