Wanner Miriam, Probst-Hensch Nicole, Kriemler Susi, Meier Flurina, Autenrieth Christine, Martin Brian W
Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben, 84, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051 Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Mar 9;3:250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.003. eCollection 2016 Jun.
Little is known about the influence of age, gender and language on the measurement properties of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The aim was to validate the long IPAQ in adults aged 18-84 in the German-, French- and Italian-speaking parts of Switzerland, focusing on differences between gender, age groups and language regions.
This cross-sectional study was conducted in the frame of SAPALDIA (Swiss Cohort Study on Air Pollution and Lung and Heart Disease in Adults) in 2011. 346 participants (54.6% women, mean age 54.6 years) wore an Actigraph GT3X accelerometer during 8 days and completed the IPAQ. IPAQ and accelerometer data on total physical activity and on different intensities as well as sitting time were compared using Spearman correlations and Bland-Altman plots.
Correlations were highest for vigorous physical activity (r = 0.41) and sitting time (r = 0.42). Significant gender differences were apparent for leisure-time physical activity (men: r = 0.35 versus women: r = 0.57, p = 0.012) and for sitting time (men: r = 0.28 versus women: r = 0.53, p = 0.007). Differences between age groups were present for sitting time (youngest: r = 0.72 versus middle: r = 0.36, p < 0.001; youngest versus oldest: r = 0.34, p = 0.001). Differences between language regions were present for vigorous physical activity (German: r = 0.28 versus Italian: r = 0.53, p = 0.033). IPAQ overestimated physical activity but underestimated sitting time.
The long IPAQ showed moderate validity similar to other studies when compared to accelerometer data in a diverse sample of individuals. Some sex, age and regional differences were observed but do not seem to limit its applicability in population sub groups.
关于年龄、性别和语言对长版国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)测量特性的影响,人们了解甚少。本研究旨在验证长版IPAQ在瑞士德语区、法语区和意大利语区18 - 84岁成年人中的有效性,重点关注性别、年龄组和语言区域之间的差异。
本横断面研究于2011年在SAPALDIA(瑞士成人空气污染与心肺疾病队列研究)框架内进行。346名参与者(54.6%为女性,平均年龄54.6岁)在8天内佩戴Actigraph GT3X加速度计,并完成IPAQ问卷。使用Spearman相关性分析和Bland - Altman图比较IPAQ与加速度计在总体力活动、不同强度体力活动以及久坐时间方面的数据。
剧烈体力活动(r = 0.41)和久坐时间(r = 0.42)的相关性最高。休闲体力活动(男性:r = 0.35,女性:r = 0.57,p = 0.012)和久坐时间(男性:r = 0.28,女性:r = 0.53,p = 0.007)存在显著性别差异。年龄组之间在久坐时间上存在差异(最年轻组:r = 0.72,中年组:r = 0.36,p < 0.001;最年轻组与最年长组:r = 0.34,p = 0.001)。语言区域之间在剧烈体力活动上存在差异(德语区:r = 0.28,意大利语区:r = 0.53,p = 0.033)。IPAQ高估了体力活动,但低估了久坐时间。
与加速度计数据相比,在不同个体样本中,长版IPAQ显示出与其他研究相似的中等有效性。观察到了一些性别、年龄和区域差异,但这些差异似乎并不限制其在人群亚组中的适用性。