• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄果实成熟期的分子遗传图谱构建及QTL分析

Molecular genetic map construction and QTL analysis of fruit maturation period in grapevine.

作者信息

Zhao Y H, Su K, Guo Y H, Ma H F, Guo X W

机构信息

Department of Pomology College of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.

Dalian Academy of Agricultural Science, Dalian, China.

出版信息

Genet Mol Res. 2016 Jun 20;15(2):gmr8040. doi: 10.4238/gmr.15028040.

DOI:10.4238/gmr.15028040
PMID:27420946
Abstract

In this study, we aimed at finding the genetic regularity of grape maturation period. Early-maturing grapevine, "87-1", was used as the female parent and late-maturing, "9-22", as the male parent, to create an F1 hybrid population. A total of 149 individual plants and their parents were selected as the mapping population. Sequence-related amplified polymorphism and simple-sequence repeat analyses were performed. We performed a linkage analysis and constructed a molecular genetic map. In the obtained map, the female and male parents each covered 19 linkage groups containing 188 and 175 maker loci, respectively. The total map distances for the female and male parents were 1074.5 and 1100.2 cM, respectively, whereas the average genetic distances between each two loci were 5.7 and 7.8 cM, respectively. The interval-mapping method was used in a quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis for fruit maturation period. A total of 12 QTLs associated with fruit maturation period were detected. These included four QTLs in the male parent genetic map that were located in linkage groups M5, M11, M14-1, and M16, with a 62.6-75.7% rate of contribution of each QTL. Another three QTLs were found in the female parent genetic map, located in linkage groups F6, F14-1, and F18, with a 72.7-77.7% rate of contribution of each QTL. Five more QTLs were detected in the consensus map, located in linkage groups LG11, LG14-1, LG16, LG17, and LG18, with 8.9-75.7% phenotypic variance explained by each QTL.

摘要

在本研究中,我们旨在探寻葡萄成熟期的遗传规律。以早熟葡萄品种“87 - 1”为母本,晚熟品种“9 - 22”为父本,构建了F1杂交群体。共选取149株单株及其亲本作为作图群体,进行了序列相关扩增多态性和简单序列重复分析。我们进行了连锁分析并构建了分子遗传图谱。在所得图谱中,母本和父本各自覆盖19个连锁群,分别包含188个和175个标记位点。母本和父本的总图距分别为1074.5 cM和1100.2 cM,而每两个位点之间的平均遗传距离分别为5.7 cM和7.8 cM。采用区间作图法对果实成熟期进行数量性状位点(QTL)分析,共检测到12个与果实成熟期相关的QTL。其中,在父本遗传图谱中有4个QTL,分别位于连锁群M5、M11、M14 - 1和M16上,每个QTL的贡献率为62.6% - 75.7%。在母本遗传图谱中发现另外3个QTL,位于连锁群F6、F14 - 1和F18上,每个QTL的贡献率为72.7% - 77.7%。在整合图谱中又检测到5个QTL,位于连锁群LG11、LG14 - 1、LG16、LG17和LG18上,每个QTL解释的表型变异为8.9% - 75.7%。

相似文献

1
Molecular genetic map construction and QTL analysis of fruit maturation period in grapevine.葡萄果实成熟期的分子遗传图谱构建及QTL分析
Genet Mol Res. 2016 Jun 20;15(2):gmr8040. doi: 10.4238/gmr.15028040.
2
Quantitative trait locus analysis of grape weight and soluble solid content.葡萄重量和可溶性固形物含量的数量性状位点分析。
Genet Mol Res. 2015 Aug 19;14(3):9872-81. doi: 10.4238/2015.August.19.21.
3
A genetic analysis of seed and berry weight in grapevine.葡萄种子和浆果重量的遗传分析。
Genome. 2006 Dec;49(12):1572-85. doi: 10.1139/g06-122.
4
Construction of a high-density genetic map and QTLs mapping for sugars and acids in grape berries.葡萄浆果糖分和酸度的高密度遗传图谱构建及QTL定位
BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Feb 3;15:28. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0428-2.
5
High-density genetic linkage map construction and cane cold hardiness QTL mapping for Vitis based on restriction site-associated DNA sequencing.基于限制性位点相关 DNA 测序的葡萄高密度遗传连锁图谱构建和茎耐寒性 QTL 作图。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jun 22;21(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06836-z.
6
Berry and phenology-related traits in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): from quantitative trait loci to underlying genes.葡萄(欧亚种葡萄)中与浆果和物候相关的性状:从数量性状基因座到潜在基因。
BMC Plant Biol. 2008 Apr 17;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-38.
7
QTL mapping for fruit quality in Citrus using DArTseq markers.利用DArTseq标记对柑橘果实品质进行QTL定位。
BMC Genomics. 2017 Apr 12;18(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3629-2.
8
Major Quantitative Trait Loci and Putative Candidate Genes for Powdery Mildew Resistance and Fruit-Related Traits Revealed by an Intraspecific Genetic Map for Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus).利用西瓜(Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus)种内遗传图谱揭示的白粉病抗性和果实相关性状的主要数量性状位点及潜在候选基因
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145665. eCollection 2015.
9
Novel stable QTLs identification for berry quality traits based on high-density genetic linkage map construction in table grape.基于葡萄高密度遗传连锁图谱构建的果实品质性状新型稳定 QTLs 鉴定。
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Sep 3;20(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02630-x.
10
High-resolution genetic linkage map of European pear (Pyrus communis) and QTL fine-mapping of vegetative budbreak time.欧洲梨(Pyrus communis)的高分辨率遗传连锁图谱和营养芽休眠时间的 QTL 精细定位。
BMC Plant Biol. 2018 Aug 31;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1386-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissection of the Pearl of Csaba pedigree identifies key genomic segments related to early ripening in grape.对 Csaba 系珍珠葡萄的剖析确定了与葡萄早期成熟相关的关键基因组片段。
Plant Physiol. 2023 Feb 12;191(2):1153-1166. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac539.
2
Dissecting the control of shoot development in grapevine: genetics and genomics identify potential regulators.解析葡萄藤芽发育的调控:遗传学和基因组学鉴定潜在的调控因子。
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Jan 29;20(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2258-0.
3
Selection of candidate genes controlling veraison time in grapevine through integration of meta-QTL and transcriptomic data.
通过整合代谢数量性状位点和转录组数据选择控制葡萄转色期的候选基因。
BMC Genomics. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6124-0.
4
Facing Climate Change: Biotechnology of Iconic Mediterranean Woody Crops.应对气候变化:地中海标志性木本作物的生物技术
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 16;10:427. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00427. eCollection 2019.
5
Genome-wide association study of berry-related traits in grape [ L.] based on genotyping-by-sequencing markers.基于简化基因组测序标记的葡萄浆果相关性状全基因组关联研究
Hortic Res. 2019 Jan 1;6:11. doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0089-z. eCollection 2019.