• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

该说什么以及如何去说:心血管疾病预防的有效沟通

What to say and how to say it: effective communication for cardiovascular disease prevention.

作者信息

Navar Ann Marie, Stone Neil J, Martin Seth S

机构信息

aDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina bDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois cDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Cardiol. 2016 Sep;31(5):537-44. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000322.

DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000322
PMID:27428113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5045897/
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current guidelines for cholesterol treatment emphasize the importance of engaging patients in a risk-benefit discussion prior to initiating statin therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although current risk prediction algorithms are well defined, there is less data on how to communicate with patients about cardiovascular disease risk, benefits of treatment, and possible adverse effects.

SUMMARY

We propose a four-part model for effective shared decision-making: 1) Assessing patient priorities, perceived risk, and prior experience with cardiovascular risk reduction; 2) Arriving at a recommendation for therapy based on the patient's risk of disease, guideline recommendations, new clinical trial data, and patient preferences; 3) Communicating this recommendation along with risks, benefits, and alternatives to therapy following best practices for discussing numeric risk; and 4) Arriving at a shared decision with the patient with ongoing reassessment as risk factors and patient priorities change.

摘要

综述目的

当前胆固醇治疗指南强调在开始他汀类药物治疗前让患者参与风险效益讨论的重要性。

最新发现

尽管当前的风险预测算法已明确,但关于如何与患者就心血管疾病风险、治疗益处及可能的不良反应进行沟通的数据较少。

总结

我们提出了一个用于有效共同决策的四部分模型:1)评估患者的优先事项、感知到的风险以及既往降低心血管风险的经验;2)根据患者的疾病风险、指南建议、新的临床试验数据以及患者偏好得出治疗建议;3)按照讨论数值风险的最佳实践,将此建议连同治疗的风险、益处和替代方案进行沟通;4)随着风险因素和患者优先事项的变化,与患者达成共同决策并持续重新评估。

相似文献

1
What to say and how to say it: effective communication for cardiovascular disease prevention.该说什么以及如何去说:心血管疾病预防的有效沟通
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2016 Sep;31(5):537-44. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000322.
2
Communicating statin evidence to support shared decision-making.传达他汀类药物的证据以支持共同决策。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 6;17:41. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0436-9.
3
Many organisations support shared decision making.许多组织支持共同决策。
BMJ. 2017 Jan 27;356:j479. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j479.
4
The Preventive-Pill Paradox: How Shared Decision Making Could Increase Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality.预防性药物悖论:共同决策如何可能增加心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率。
Circulation. 2016 Nov 22;134(21):1599-1600. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025204.
5
Impact of effectiveness information format on patient choice of therapy and satisfaction with decisions about chronic disease medication: the "Influence of intervention Methodologies on Patient Choice of Therapy (IMPACT)" cluster-randomised trial in general practice.疗效信息格式对慢性病药物治疗选择和决策满意度的影响:一般实践中“干预方法对患者治疗选择的影响(IMPACT)”集群随机试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 25;13:76. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-76.
6
Individualized Risk Communication and Outreach for Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Community Health Centers: Randomized Trial.社区卫生中心原发性心血管疾病预防的个性化风险沟通与推广:随机试验
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Nov;8(6):560-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001723. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
7
Patient and other factors influencing the prescribing of cardiovascular prevention therapy in the general practice setting with and without nurse assessment.患者及其他因素对全科医疗环境中有无护士评估情况下心血管预防治疗处方的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2012 May-Jun;32(3):498-506. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12437246. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
8
Aspirin, Statins, and Primary Prevention: Opportunities for Shared Decision Making in the Face of Uncertainty.阿司匹林、他汀类药物与一级预防:面对不确定性时共同决策的机遇
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 May 7;23(6):67. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01499-y.
9
Clinician-patient risk discussion for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention: importance to implementation of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines.临床医生与患者关于动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病预防的风险讨论:对实施2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南的重要性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 7;65(13):1361-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.043.
10
Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: an examination based on informed decision making.医生结直肠癌筛查建议:基于知情决策的审视
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Adults Aged 40 to 79 Years with Diagnosed Hypertension, High Cholesterol, and/or Diabetes but Not on Medications: Findings from Nationwide Cross-Sectional Studies.40至79岁已确诊患有高血压、高胆固醇和/或糖尿病但未接受药物治疗的成年人发生心血管事件的风险:全国性横断面研究结果
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Aug 29;11(9):268. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11090268.
2
Assessment of Lifetime Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: Time to Move Forward.评估心血管疾病终生风险:是时候向前迈进了。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2024;20(6):e030724231561. doi: 10.2174/011573403X311031240703080650.
3
Cardiovascular disease risk communication and prevention: a meta-analysis.心血管疾病风险沟通与预防:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Mar 27;45(12):998-1013. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae002.
4
Awareness of cardiovascular risk among persons with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.2 型糖尿病患者对心血管风险的认知:一项定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2294512. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2294512. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
5
Cardiovascular disease threat and perceived efficacy of selected preventive behaviors among Polish men: an analysis based on the extended parallel process model.波兰男性的心血管疾病威胁与特定预防行为的感知效果:基于扩展平行过程模型的分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 13;11:1244302. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1244302. eCollection 2023.
6
[Primary and secondary prevention in hypercholesterolemia: differences relevant to patient care in the PROCYON trial].[高胆固醇血症的一级和二级预防:PROCYON试验中与患者护理相关的差异]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2023 Sep;148(19):e101-e110. doi: 10.1055/a-2117-6504. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
7
Patient and Physician Reported Perception on Hypercholesterolemia Management in Primary Prevention in Germany: Results from a Nationwide Online Survey.患者和医生对德国初级预防高胆固醇血症管理的认知:一项全国性在线调查结果。
Adv Ther. 2022 Sep;39(9):4315-4329. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02266-3. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
8
Perceived cardiovascular disease risk and tailored communication strategies among rural and urban community dwellers in Rwanda: a qualitative study.卢旺达农村和城市居民对心血管疾病风险的认知和针对性沟通策略:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 9;22(1):920. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13330-6.
9
Association between Big Five Personality Traits and Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation in Japanese Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.大五人格特质与日本心血管疾病患者参与心脏康复的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 14;18(16):8589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168589.
10
Communication approaches to enhance patient motivation and adherence in cardiovascular disease prevention.沟通方法在心血管疾病预防中增强患者动机和依从性。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Sep;44(9):1199-1207. doi: 10.1002/clc.23555. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Cholesterol Lowering in Intermediate-Risk Persons without Cardiovascular Disease.在无心血管疾病的中危人群中降低胆固醇。
N Engl J Med. 2016 May 26;374(21):2021-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600176. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
2
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Lowering Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol With Statin Therapy: 20-Year Follow-Up of West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study.他汀类药物治疗降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的长期安全性和有效性:西苏格兰冠心病预防研究的20年随访
Circulation. 2016 Mar 15;133(11):1073-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019014. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
3
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
4
Clinician-patient risk discussion for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention: importance to implementation of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines.临床医生与患者关于动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病预防的风险讨论:对实施2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南的重要性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 7;65(13):1361-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.043.
5
Evidence-based risk communication: a systematic review.循证风险沟通:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Aug 19;161(4):270-80. doi: 10.7326/M14-0295.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
7
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会成人降低动脉粥样硬化性心血管风险的血胆固醇治疗指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2889-934. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
8
2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会降低心血管风险生活方式管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2960-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
9
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管风险评估指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S49-73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会(EAS)血脂异常管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会(EAS)血脂异常管理特别工作组
Atherosclerosis. 2011 Jul;217 Suppl 1:S1-44. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.06.012.