• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理教育临床评估工具(CAT-NE)的开发与验证

Development and validation of a Clinical Assessment Tool for Nursing Education (CAT-NE).

作者信息

Skúladóttir Hafdís, Svavarsdóttir Margrét Hrönn

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of Akureyri, Solborg v/Norðurslóð, 600 Akureyri, Iceland.

School of Health Sciences, University of Akureyri, Solborg v/Norðurslóð, 600 Akureyri, Iceland; Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Care and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Sep;20:31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2016.06.008
PMID:27428801
Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a valid assessment tool to guide clinical education and evaluate students' performance in clinical nursing education. The development of the Clinical Assessment Tool for Nursing Education (CAT-NE) was based on the theory of nursing as professional caring and the Bologna learning outcomes. Benson and Clark's four steps of instrument development and validation guided the development and assessment of the tool. A mixed-methods approach with individual structured cognitive interviewing and quantitative assessments was used to validate the tool. Supervisory teachers, a pedagogical consultant, clinical expert teachers, clinical teachers, and nursing students at the University of Akureyri in Iceland participated in the process. This assessment tool is valid to assess the clinical performance of nursing students; it consists of rubrics that list the criteria for the students' expected performance. According to the students and their clinical teachers, the assessment tool clarified learning objectives, enhanced the focus of the assessment process, and made evaluation more objective. Training clinical teachers on how to assess students' performances in clinical studies and use the tool enhanced the quality of clinical assessment in nursing education.

摘要

本研究的目的是开发一种有效的评估工具,以指导临床教育并评估学生在临床护理教育中的表现。护理教育临床评估工具(CAT-NE)的开发基于专业护理理论和博洛尼亚学习成果。本森和克拉克仪器开发与验证的四个步骤指导了该工具的开发和评估。采用了个体结构化认知访谈和定量评估相结合的混合方法来验证该工具。冰岛阿库雷里大学的督导教师、教学顾问、临床专家教师、临床教师和护理专业学生参与了这一过程。该评估工具可有效评估护理专业学生的临床实践表现;它由列出学生预期表现标准的评分细则组成。据学生及其临床教师反映,该评估工具明确了学习目标,增强了评估过程的重点,并使评估更加客观。对临床教师进行如何评估学生在临床学习中的表现以及如何使用该工具的培训,提高了护理教育中临床评估的质量。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a Clinical Assessment Tool for Nursing Education (CAT-NE).护理教育临床评估工具(CAT-NE)的开发与验证
Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Sep;20:31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
2
A comparative study of assessment grading and nursing students' perceptions of quality in sessional and tenured teachers.评估分级的比较研究和护理学生对兼职教师和终身教职教师的质量感知。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Dec;42(4):423-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01365.x. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
3
Supporting students' learning and professional development through the process of continuous assessment and mentorship.通过持续评估和指导过程支持学生的学习和专业发展。
Nurse Educ Today. 2000 Aug;20(6):463-74. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2000.0458.
4
Nurse teacher models in clinical education from the perspective of student nurses--A mixed method study.从实习护士视角看临床教育中的带教护士模式——一项混合方法研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Dec;35(12):1289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
5
Course-embedded assessment in Korean nursing baccalaureate education.韩国护理学学士学位教育中的课程嵌入式评估
Korean J Med Educ. 2016 Sep;28(3):295-303. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2016.36. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
6
Student learning in clinical nursing education: perceptions of the relationship between assessment and learning.临床护理教育中的学生学习:对评估与学习之间关系的认知
Nurse Educ Today. 2005 May;25(4):299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.013. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
7
Students' perceptions on the use of portfolios in pre-registration nursing education: a questionnaire survey.学生对注册前护理教育中使用档案袋的看法:一项问卷调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Mar;43(3):333-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
8
A descriptive study of a clinical evaluation tool and process: student and faculty perspectives.一项临床评估工具和流程的描述性研究:学生和教师的观点。
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Mar;53(3):S30-3. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140211-02. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
9
Undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of the effectiveness of clinical teaching behaviours in Malaysia: A cross-sectional, correlational survey.马来西亚本科护理专业学生对临床教学行为有效性的认知:一项横断面相关性调查。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Sep;44:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 May 27.
10
Development and validation of the nursing clinical assessment tool (NCAT): a psychometric research study.护理临床评估工具(NCAT)的开发与验证:一项心理测量学研究。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2021 Jun 3;18(1):ijnes-2020-0091. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2020-0091.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Competency During Undergraduate Midwifery Training in Malawi: A Concept Analysis.马拉维本科助产士培训期间的临床能力:概念分析
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Sep 26;14:1067-1075. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S426347. eCollection 2023.
2
Design and Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure the Perception of Nursing Degree Students about the Learning Process in Primary Care.一份用于测量护理专业学生对基层医疗学习过程认知的问卷的设计与验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 9;10(11):2240. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112240.
3
Mentors' and student nurses' experiences of the clinical competence assessment tool.
带教老师和实习护士对临床能力评估工具的体验
Afr J Health Prof Educ. 2020 Nov;12(4):179-185. doi: 10.7196/ajhpe.2020.v12i4.1380.
4
Determining the effects of traditional learning approach and interactive learning activities on personal and professional factors among Saudi intern nurses.确定传统学习方法和互动学习活动对沙特实习护士个人和职业因素的影响。
Nurs Open. 2020 Sep 30;8(1):327-332. doi: 10.1002/nop2.633. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Development and validation of interprofessional learning assessment tool for health professionals in continuing professional development (CPD).开发和验证继续职业发展(CPD)中卫生专业人员的跨专业学习评估工具。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211405. eCollection 2019.