• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证继续职业发展(CPD)中卫生专业人员的跨专业学习评估工具。

Development and validation of interprofessional learning assessment tool for health professionals in continuing professional development (CPD).

机构信息

The Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.

Research Development and Innovation Center, Our Lady of Fatima University, Valenzuela City, Philippines.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211405. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0211405
PMID:30682137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6347297/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Interprofessional learning (IPL) is increasingly recognized as a promising strategy in addressing the burgeoning challenges in healthcare. Its assessment remains to be perplexing and requires accurate measurements. Thus, this study intended to develop a valid and reliable reflective tool in assessing IPL as a Continuing Professional Development (CPD) outcome.

METHODS

A one-group post-posttest pre-experimental design with tool development was employed to establish the validity and reliability of the "Inventory of Reflective Vignette-Interprofessional Learning" (IRV-IPL). This tool was developed from an extensive literature review and designed with three segments to assess interprofessional competencies before, after, and what if scenarios using vignettes. After it was validated by education experts (n = 5) and written consent forms were signed by the participants, the IRV-IPL was pilot tested among healthcare professionals (n = 10) for analysis and improvement. During the actual implementation, it was administered to healthcare professionals (n = 45) who participated in a university-provided CPD event. Collected data underwent validity and reliability testing.

RESULTS

IRV-IPL generated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.98), and across all segments of collaboration (α = 0.96), coordination (α = 0.96), cooperation (α = 0.96), communication (α = 0.97), and commendation (α = 0.98). Items exhibited significantly positive large correlations (r > 0.35, p < 0.05) in all segments showing beneficial measures for postdictive validity in recalling prior interprofessional competencies, and predictive validity in estimating interprofessional learning as an outcome of CPD and alternative interventions.

CONCLUSION

This study provided a piece of groundwork evidence on the use of IRV-IPL as a reflective assessment tool for interprofessional learning in CPD contexts. Further studies are essential to explore the educational utility of IRV framework in crafting relevant assessments and to establish construct validity of IRV-IPL using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.

摘要

简介

专业间学习(IPL)越来越被认为是应对医疗保健领域日益增长挑战的一种有前途的策略。它的评估仍然令人困惑,需要准确的测量。因此,本研究旨在开发一种有效的、可靠的反映工具,以评估 IPL 作为持续专业发展(CPD)的结果。

方法

采用单组后测后测前实验设计和工具开发方法,建立了“反映情景 IPL 量表”(IRV-IPL)的有效性和可靠性。该工具是从广泛的文献回顾中开发出来的,设计了三个部分,使用情景案例来评估CPD 之前、之后和如果情景下的专业间能力。在经过教育专家(n=5)验证并由参与者签署书面同意书后,IRV-IPL 在医疗保健专业人员(n=10)中进行了试点测试,以进行分析和改进。在实际实施过程中,对参加大学提供的 CPD 活动的医疗保健专业人员(n=45)进行了IRV-IPL 的管理。收集的数据进行了有效性和可靠性测试。

结果

IRV-IPL 产生了极好的内部一致性(α=0.98),并且在所有协作(α=0.96)、协调(α=0.96)、合作(α=0.96)、沟通(α=0.97)和赞扬(α=0.98)的部分都有很好的表现。在所有部分中,项目都表现出显著的正相关(r>0.35,p<0.05),这对回忆先前的专业间能力的后测预测效度和CPD 和替代干预措施的结果的预测预测效度都有很好的衡量作用。

结论

本研究为在 CPD 背景下使用 IRV-IPL 作为专业间学习的反映性评估工具提供了一些基础证据。进一步的研究对于探索 IRV 框架在制定相关评估中的教育效用以及使用探索性和验证性因素分析建立 IRV-IPL 的结构有效性至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c1/6347297/e45b2a09f559/pone.0211405.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c1/6347297/e45b2a09f559/pone.0211405.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31c1/6347297/e45b2a09f559/pone.0211405.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of interprofessional learning assessment tool for health professionals in continuing professional development (CPD).开发和验证继续职业发展(CPD)中卫生专业人员的跨专业学习评估工具。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211405. eCollection 2019.
2
Developing a valid and reliable assessment of knowledge translation (KT) for continuing professional development program of health professionals.为卫生专业人员的继续职业发展计划制定一个有效且可靠的知识转化(KT)评估。
PeerJ. 2018 Aug 13;6:e5323. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5323. eCollection 2018.
3
WHIRL Study: Workplace Health Interprofessional Learning in the Construction Industry.WHIRL 研究:建筑行业的工作场所健康跨专业学习。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6815. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186815.
4
Content validation of an interprofessional learning video peer assessment tool.跨专业学习视频同伴评估工具的内容验证。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1099-5.
5
Using complexity theory to develop a student-directed interprofessional learning activity for 1220 healthcare students.运用复杂性理论为1220名医护专业学生开展以学生为导向的跨专业学习活动。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 8;16:199. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0717-y.
6
Validating the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) in the postgraduate context: are health care professionals ready for IPL?验证研究生阶段的跨专业学习准备度量表(RIPLS):医疗保健专业人员是否为跨专业学习做好准备?
Med Educ. 2006 May;40(5):415-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02442.x.
7
Auditing an organization's interprofessional learning and interprofessional practice: the interprofessional praxis audit framework (IPAF).审核组织的跨专业学习和跨专业实践:跨专业实践审核框架(IPAF)。
J Interprof Care. 2010 Jul;24(4):436-49. doi: 10.3109/13561820903163801.
8
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
9
Readiness to change for interprofessional collaboration in healthcare: Development and validation of a theory-based instrument.医疗保健领域跨专业协作的变革意愿:一种基于理论的工具的开发与验证
J Interprof Care. 2018 Sep;32(5):539-548. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1448371. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
10
Self-assessment, attitude and perception of interprofessional learning in hospital acquired infection control practices among health professionals in Klang Valley, Malaysia.马来西亚巴生谷地区卫生专业人员在医院感染控制实践中对跨专业学习的自我评估、态度和认知
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02610-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of a Simulation-Based Interprofessional Teamwork Assessment Tool (SITAT) to Individual Student Performance in a Team-Based Simulation.基于模拟的跨专业团队合作评估工具(SITAT)在基于团队的模拟中对个体学生表现的应用。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021 Sep 24;8:23821205211042436. doi: 10.1177/23821205211042436. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
WHIRL Study: Workplace Health Interprofessional Learning in the Construction Industry.WHIRL 研究:建筑行业的工作场所健康跨专业学习。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6815. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186815.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of interprofessional learning and simulation in undergraduate nursing programs to address interprofessional communication and collaboration: An integrative review of the literature.本科护理专业中运用跨专业学习与模拟教学来解决跨专业沟通与协作问题:文献综合综述
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:118-127. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.021. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
2
Validation of learning assessments: A primer.学习评估的验证:入门指南。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Sep;9(5):925-933. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
3
Resident Vignettes for Assessing Care Quality in Nursing Homes.
养老院护理质量评估的居民案例。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 May;19(5):405-410. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
4
A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools Measuring Interprofessional Education Outcomes Relevant to Pharmacy Education.测量与药学教育相关的跨专业教育成果的评估工具的系统评价
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Aug;81(6):119. doi: 10.5688/ajpe816119.
5
Translating interprofessional theory to interprofessional practice.将跨专业理论转化为跨专业实践。
J Prof Nurs. 2017 Sep-Oct;33(5):370-377. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
6
Differential item functioning in quality of life measurement: An analysis using anchoring vignettes.生活质量测量中的差异项目功能:使用锚定情境分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;190:247-255. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.033. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
7
Pharmacist perceptions of competency: Identifying priority areas for a competency program development at an academic medical center.药师的能力认知:在学术医疗中心确定能力培养计划的优先领域。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jun;14(6):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
8
The effect of interprofessional team-based learning among nursing students: A quasi-experimental study.跨专业团队学习对护理专业学生的影响:一项准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Jun;53:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
9
Development and validation of a Clinical Assessment Tool for Nursing Education (CAT-NE).护理教育临床评估工具(CAT-NE)的开发与验证
Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Sep;20:31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
10
Promises and Pitfalls of Anchoring Vignettes in Health Survey Research.健康调查研究中锚定 vignettes 的前景与陷阱
Demography. 2015 Oct;52(5):1703-28. doi: 10.1007/s13524-015-0422-1.