Chesterfield-Thomas Gemma, Goldsmith Ira
Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales, UK
Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Nov;23(5):729-732. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw238. Epub 2016 Jul 17.
Patients with dyspnoea who are suitable for lung resection have a higher in-hospital mortality following surgery as predicted by the Thoracoscore. We evaluated the role of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PPR) in improving preoperative dyspnoea, performance status and thereby the Thoracoscore and reducing the risk of postoperative mortality, complications and length of stay in such patients.
From June 2013 until May 2014, we prospectively and sequentially identified high-risk patients in our outpatient clinic with dyspnoea grade ≥2 and performance status ≥1 for lung resection and recruited them for PPR. Thoracoscores, dyspnoea grade and performance status before and after PPR were calculated for all patients. Hospital mortality, complication rates and the length of hospital stay following surgery were compared between those who received PPR with those who did not undergo PPR and instead went straight to surgery.
Of the 42 patients (67% females, mean age 67 years [SD 13]) identified, 33 patients received PPR for a mean duration of 7.1 [SD 6.5] days. Their mean Thoracoscores before and after PPR were 6.4 [SD 5.1] and 1.7% [SD 1.3] (P < 0.00009); dyspnoea grade 3.8 [SD 0.6] and 2.2 [SD 0.6] (P < 0.00001); and performance status 2.7 [SD 0.5] and 1.7 [SD 0.6] (P < 0.00001), respectively. The postoperative mortality in those who received PPR and those who did not undergo PPR but went straight to surgery, respectively, was 0 vs 11.1% (P = 0.05), postoperative complication rate was 5.3 vs 37.5% (P < 0.015) and the mean length of hospital stay was 8.7 [SD 3.5] days vs 10.3 [SD 6.2] days (P = 0.26), respectively.
Our prospective study suggests that in those patients with dyspnoea requiring lung resection, PPR significantly improves their exercise capacity, reduces dyspnoea and improves the Thoracoscore. The study also suggests that PPR helps reduce postoperative complications and obviates the increased length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality that may be otherwise expected.
对于适合肺切除术的呼吸困难患者,胸腔镜手术评分(Thoracoscore)预测其术后院内死亡率较高。我们评估了术前肺康复(PPR)在改善术前呼吸困难、身体状况,从而改善胸腔镜手术评分以及降低此类患者术后死亡、并发症风险和住院时间方面的作用。
从2013年6月至2014年5月,我们在门诊前瞻性、依次识别出肺切除手术风险高、呼吸困难分级≥2且身体状况≥1的患者,并招募他们接受PPR。计算所有患者PPR前后的胸腔镜手术评分、呼吸困难分级和身体状况。比较接受PPR的患者与未接受PPR而是直接进行手术的患者的术后死亡率、并发症发生率和住院时间。
在识别出的42例患者(67%为女性,平均年龄67岁[标准差13])中,33例患者接受了平均时长为7.1[标准差6.5]天的PPR。他们PPR前后的平均胸腔镜手术评分分别为6.4[标准差5.1]和1.7%[标准差1.3](P<0.00009);呼吸困难分级分别为3.8[标准差0.6]和2.2[标准差0.6](P<0.00001);身体状况分别为2.7[标准差0.5]和1.7[标准差0.6](P<0.00001)。接受PPR的患者与未接受PPR而是直接进行手术的患者的术后死亡率分别为0和11.1%(P=0.05),术后并发症发生率分别为5.3%和37.5%(P<0.015),平均住院时间分别为8.7[标准差3.5]天和10.3[标准差6.2]天(P=0.26)。
我们的前瞻性研究表明,对于那些需要肺切除术的呼吸困难患者,PPR能显著提高他们的运动能力,减轻呼吸困难并改善胸腔镜手术评分。该研究还表明,PPR有助于减少术后并发症,避免可能出现的住院时间延长和院内死亡增加的情况。