• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌患者术前通过肺康复进行优化治疗:使不可手术患者变得可手术。

Pre-treatment optimization with pulmonary rehabilitation in lung cancer: Making the inoperable patients operable.

作者信息

Goldsmith Ira, Chesterfield-Thomas Gemma, Toghill Hannah

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales SA6 6NL, UK.

Department of Physiotherapy, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales SA6 6NL, UK.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 30;31:100663. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100663. eCollection 2021 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100663
PMID:33554075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7846708/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anatomical lung resection offers the best prospect of long-term survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, some patients with significant dyspnoea, impaired performance status (PS), borderline or poor pulmonary function are considered inoperable and instead referred for radiotherapy, chemotherapy or palliative care. The aims of the study were to determine whether pre-operative pulmonary physiotherapy (Prehab), by improving clinical parameters, (i) makes patients suitable for surgery who were considered inoperable on subjective criteria of dyspnoea >3 and PS >2, and objective criteria of diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <50%; and (ii) thereby allows them to safely receive curative surgery with reduced morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2018 a total of 306 patients were prospectively and sequentially assessed for Prehab and 216 patients with lung cancer studied. Their mean age (95% CI) was 71.7 ± 1.1 years, 50.5% ( = 109) were men and they received Prehab over 39.0 ± 7.0 days averaging 3.1 ± 0.6 sessions. Their dyspnoea scores, PS, level of activity, six minute walk test (6MWT) and frailty index prior to and following Prehab were determined. Following surgery the post-operative length of hospital stay (LOHS), complications and mortality at 30 days, 90 days and 1 year determined. Similar outcomes were determined for (i) high-risk patients with dyspnoea scores >3 and PS >2, and compared with low-risk patients having dyspnoea scores <2 and PS <2 (subjective criteria); and (ii) high-risk patients with DLCO <50% and compared with low-risk patients with DLCO >80% (objective criteria).

FINDINGS

In the total cohort following Prehab, there was significant improvement in the dyspnoea scores <2 / ≥2 (40%/60% prior to Prehab vs. 65%/35% following Prehab,  = 0.00002), PS <2 / ≥2 (45%/55% prior to vs. 62%/38% following Prehab,  = 0.003), frailty index ≤3 / >3 (49%/51% vs 70%/30%,  = 0.0006), and 6MWT (306.6 ± 6.8 m vs 354.8 ± 52.7 m,  = 0.04). Post-operative major complication rates were 8.7%; median LOHS was 7 (IQR 6) days; hospital mortality at 30 days 1.3%, 90 days 4.7% and 1 year 16%. Using subjective criteria of dyspnoea scores >3 and PS >2, 100% of high-risk patients were considered inoperable. Following optimization with Prehab 84.2% of the high-risk patients were ready to proceed with radical treatment and 52.6% with surgery, and subsequently 42.8% of patients underwent surgery. Likewise, 78.8% of patients with DLCO <50% were considered inoperable. Following Prehab 86.5% of high-risk patients were ready to proceed with radical treatment and 59.1% with surgery, and 54.6% of high-risk patients underwent surgery. In each category there were no significant differences in complications, LOHS or mortality rates between the high-risk and low-risk patients.

INTERPRETATION

Our prospective study showed that with Prehab there was clinical and statistically significant improvement in the dyspnoea scores, PS, level of activity and frailty, particularly in the high-risk group of patients. Importantly, Prehab made previously inoperable patients operable, allowing them to safely undergo curative lung resection. This strategy helps improve resection rates and may contribute to the long term survival of lung cancer patients.

FUNDING

This is a Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee (WHSSC) commissioned service.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec1/7846708/2a7dfbd93146/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec1/7846708/addaf39f06e0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec1/7846708/2a7dfbd93146/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec1/7846708/addaf39f06e0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec1/7846708/2a7dfbd93146/gr2.jpg
摘要

背景

解剖性肺切除术为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者提供了最佳的长期生存前景。然而,一些有明显呼吸困难、功能状态(PS)受损、肺功能临界或较差的患者被认为无法进行手术,转而接受放疗、化疗或姑息治疗。本研究的目的是确定术前肺康复治疗(Prehab)是否通过改善临床参数,(i)使那些根据主观标准呼吸困难评分>3且PS>2,以及客观标准一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)<50%而被认为无法手术的患者适合手术;(ii)从而使他们能够安全地接受根治性手术,同时降低发病率和死亡率。

方法

从2017年1月至2018年12月,对总共306例患者进行了前瞻性和序贯性的Prehab评估,其中216例肺癌患者纳入研究。他们的平均年龄(95%CI)为71.7±1.1岁,50.5%(n = 109)为男性,他们接受Prehab治疗的时间为39.0±7.0天,平均治疗3.1±0.6个疗程。测定了他们在Prehab治疗前后的呼吸困难评分、PS、活动水平、六分钟步行试验(6MWT)和衰弱指数。手术后,确定术后住院时间(LOHS)、30天、90天和1年时的并发症及死亡率。对(i)呼吸困难评分>3且PS>2的高危患者进行了类似结果的测定,并与呼吸困难评分<2且PS<2的低危患者(主观标准)进行比较;(ii)DLCO<50%的高危患者进行了类似结果的测定,并与DLCO>80%的低危患者(客观标准)进行比较。

结果

在整个队列中,经过Prehab治疗后,呼吸困难评分<2/≥2(Prehab治疗前为40%/60%,治疗后为65%/35%,P = 0.00002)、PS<2/≥2(治疗前为45%/55%,治疗后为62%/38%,P = 0.003)、衰弱指数≤3/>3(49%/51%对70%/30%,P = 0.0006)以及6MWT(306.6±6.8米对354.8±52.7米,P = 0.04)均有显著改善。术后主要并发症发生率为8.7%;中位LOHS为7(IQR 6)天;30天医院死亡率为1.3%,90天为4.7%,1年为16%。采用呼吸困难评分>3且PS>2的主观标准,100%的高危患者被认为无法手术。经过Prehab优化后,84.2%的高危患者准备进行根治性治疗,52.6%准备进行手术,随后42.8%的患者接受了手术。同样,78.8%的DLCO<50%的患者被认为无法手术。经过Prehab治疗后,86.5%的高危患者准备进行根治性治疗,59.1%准备进行手术,54.6%的高危患者接受了手术。在每个类别中,高危患者和低危患者在并发症、LOHS或死亡率方面均无显著差异。

解读

我们的前瞻性研究表明,通过Prehab治疗,呼吸困难评分、PS、活动水平和衰弱程度在临床和统计学上均有显著改善,特别是在高危患者组中。重要的是,Prehab使先前无法手术的患者能够接受手术,从而使他们能够安全地进行根治性肺切除术。这一策略有助于提高切除率,并可能有助于肺癌患者的长期生存。

资金来源

这是威尔士卫生专业服务委员会(WHSSC)委托开展的一项服务。

相似文献

1
Pre-treatment optimization with pulmonary rehabilitation in lung cancer: Making the inoperable patients operable.肺癌患者术前通过肺康复进行优化治疗:使不可手术患者变得可手术。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 30;31:100663. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100663. eCollection 2021 Jan.
2
Pre-treatment optimisation with pulmonary rehabilitation of elderly lung cancer patients with frailty for surgery.老年虚弱型肺癌患者术前肺康复治疗优化。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02433-9.
3
Home-based preoperative rehabilitation (prehab) to improve physical function and reduce hospital length of stay for frail patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgery.基于家庭的术前康复(预康复)可改善身体功能并缩短接受冠状动脉搭桥术和瓣膜手术的体弱患者的住院时间。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Oct 26;12(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0655-8.
4
Thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer in patients with impaired pulmonary function: analysis from a national database.肺功能受损患者的非小细胞肺癌胸腔镜肺叶切除术:来自国家数据库的分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Jun 1;30(6):803-811. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa044.
5
Impact of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation on the Thoracoscore of patients undergoing lung resection.术前肺康复对肺切除患者胸科手术风险评分的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Nov;23(5):729-732. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw238. Epub 2016 Jul 17.
6
The impact of adjuvant brachytherapy with sublobar resection on pulmonary function and dyspnea in high-risk patients with operable disease: preliminary results from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4032 trial.辅助性亚肺叶切除术联合近距离放疗对可手术高危病变患者肺功能和呼吸困难的影响:美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组 Z4032 试验的初步结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Sep;142(3):554-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.061. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
7
Outcomes of lobectomy in patients with severely compromised lung function (predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide % ≤ 40%).严重肺功能受损(预计术后一氧化碳弥散量%≤40%)患者行肺叶切除术的结果。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Dec;10(6):616-21. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201305-117OC.
8
Postinduction therapy pulmonary function retesting is necessary before surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌手术切除前需要进行诱导治疗后肺功能复测。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;164(2):389-397.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.12.030. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
9
Different diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide as predictors of respiratory morbidity.不同的肺一氧化碳弥散能力作为呼吸系统疾病的预测指标
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Aug;88(2):405-10; discussion 410-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.015.
10
Comparison between quantitative computed tomography, scintigraphy, and anatomical methods for prediction of postoperative FEV and DLCO: effects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status and resected lobes.定量计算机断层扫描、闪烁扫描法和解剖学方法预测术后第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV)和一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)的比较:慢性阻塞性肺疾病状态和切除肺叶的影响
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Oct;12(10):5269-5280. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1280.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of combined Baduanjin-auricular acupressure treatment for the postoperative rehabilitation of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.八段锦联合耳穴按压对非小细胞肺癌患者术后康复的疗效及安全性:一项随机对照试验方案
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):4323-4338. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-966. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
Use of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Lung Cancer Patients in Korea: Analysis of the National Health Insurance Service Database.韩国肺癌患者肺康复治疗的应用:基于国民健康保险服务数据库的分析
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 May 5;40(17):e150. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e150.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995-2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study.1995-2014 年七个高收入国家癌症存活率、死亡率和发病率的进展(ICBP SURVMARK-2):一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1493-1505. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30456-5. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
2
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials on Preoperative Physical Exercise Interventions in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.非小细胞肺癌患者术前体育锻炼干预的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jul 5;11(7):944. doi: 10.3390/cancers11070944.
3
Prehabilitation for people with cancer.
癌症患者的术前康复
BJA Educ. 2025 May;25(5):191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2025.01.004. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Operable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.可手术非小细胞肺癌患者的肺康复治疗
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 24;14(3):770. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030770.
5
Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Lung Cancer: Physiological Principles and Clinical Utilization in Surgical and Non-surgical Settings.肺癌的无创机械通气:生理原理及在手术和非手术环境中的临床应用
Thorac Res Pract. 2025 Jan 3;26(1):32-39. doi: 10.4274/ThoracResPract.2024.23076.
6
Efficacy of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.术前肺康复对肺癌患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Discov Oncol. 2025 Jan 17;16(1):56. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-01774-2.
7
[Chinese Expert Consensus on Perioperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation Training 
for Lung Cancer].《中国肺癌围手术期肺康复训练专家共识》
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 20;27(7):495-503. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.25.
8
Exercise in cancer patients: assistance levels and referral pathways-a position statement from the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.癌症患者的运动:辅助水平与转诊途径——西班牙医学肿瘤学会的立场声明
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Jan;27(1):108-116. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03546-w. Epub 2024 Jun 23.
9
The use of technology in cancer prehabilitation: a systematic review.癌症康复前技术应用的系统评价
Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 19;14:1321493. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1321493. eCollection 2024.
10
The Relationship Between Rehabilitation and Frailty in Advanced Heart or Lung Disease.晚期心肺疾病康复与衰弱的关系
Transplant Direct. 2024 Mar 7;10(4):e1606. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001606. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Early exercise pulmonary diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide after anatomical lung resection: a word of caution for fast-track programmes.
解剖性肺切除术后早期运动肺一氧化碳弥散量:对快速通道方案的警示。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jul 1;56(1):143-149. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz007.
4
Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.肺康复对肺癌合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者术后并发症的影响。
Thorac Cancer. 2017 Sep;8(5):451-460. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12466. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
5
The Eighth Edition Lung Cancer Stage Classification.《第八版肺癌分期分类》
Chest. 2017 Jan;151(1):193-203. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
6
Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life During Rehabilitation in Patients With Operable Lung Cancer: A Feasibility Study (PROLUCA).可切除肺癌患者康复期间健康相关生活质量的变化:一项可行性研究(PROLUCA)
Integr Cancer Ther. 2018 Jun;17(2):388-400. doi: 10.1177/1534735416668258. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
7
Impact of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation on the Thoracoscore of patients undergoing lung resection.术前肺康复对肺切除患者胸科手术风险评分的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Nov;23(5):729-732. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw238. Epub 2016 Jul 17.
8
Moving beyond Karnofsky and ECOG Performance Status Assessments with New Technologies.借助新技术超越卡诺夫斯基和东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评估。
J Oncol. 2016;2016:6186543. doi: 10.1155/2016/6186543. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
9
[FITT principle of exercise in the management of lifestyle-related diseases].[生活方式相关疾病管理中的运动FITT原则]
Clin Calcium. 2016 Mar;26(3):447-51.
10
Perioperative rehabilitation in operation for lung cancer (PROLUCA) - rationale and design.肺癌手术围手术期康复(PROLUCA)——原理与设计
BMC Cancer. 2014 Jun 4;14:404. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-404.