• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经单侧入路行L5-S1微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:技术可行性及疗效

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes.

作者信息

Choi Won-Suh, Kim Jin-Sung, Ryu Kyeong-Sik, Hur Jung-Woo, Seong Ji-Hoon

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2518394. doi: 10.1155/2016/2518394. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1155/2016/2518394
PMID:27433472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4940521/
Abstract

Background. Minimally invasive spinal transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) at L5-S1 is technically more demanding than it is at other levels because of the anatomical and biomechanical traits. Objective. To determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of MIS-TLIF for treatment of single-level spinal stenosis low-grade isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis at L5-S1. Methods. Radiological data and electronic medical records of patients who underwent MIS-TLIF between May 2012 and December 2014 were reviewed. Fusion rate, cage position, disc height (DH), disc angle (DA), disc slope angle, segmental lordotic angle (SLA), lumbar lordotic angle (LLA), and pelvic parameters were assessed. For functional assessment, the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and patient satisfaction rate (PSR) were utilized. Results. A total of 21 levels in 21 patients were studied. DH, DA, SLA, and LLA had increased from their preoperative measures at the final follow-up. Fusion rate was 86.7% (18/21) at 12 months' follow-up. The most common cage position was anteromedial (15/21). The mean VAS scores for back and leg pain mean ODI scores improved significantly at the final follow-up. PSR was 88%. Cage subsidence was observed in 33.3% (7/21). Conclusions. The clinical and radiologic outcomes after MIS-TLIF at L5-S1 in patients with spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis are generally favorable.

摘要

背景。由于解剖学和生物力学特性,L5 - S1节段的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS - TLIF)在技术上比其他节段要求更高。目的。确定MIS - TLIF治疗L5 - S1单节段脊柱狭窄、低度峡部裂或退变性椎体滑脱的临床和放射学结果。方法。回顾2012年5月至2014年12月期间接受MIS - TLIF治疗患者的放射学数据和电子病历。评估融合率、椎间融合器位置、椎间盘高度(DH)、椎间盘角度(DA)、椎间盘倾斜角、节段性前凸角(SLA)、腰椎前凸角(LLA)和骨盆参数。对于功能评估,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和患者满意率(PSR)。结果。共研究了21例患者的21个节段。在末次随访时,DH、DA、SLA和LLA较术前测量值均有所增加。随访12个月时融合率为86.7%(18/21)。最常见的椎间融合器位置是前内侧(15/21)。末次随访时,背部和腿部疼痛的平均VAS评分以及平均ODI评分均有显著改善。PSR为88%。观察到33.3%(7/21)的患者出现椎间融合器下沉。结论。对于脊柱狭窄或椎体滑脱患者,L5 - S1节段MIS - TLIF术后的临床和放射学结果总体良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/730822551dc0/BMRI2016-2518394.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/c46278df9784/BMRI2016-2518394.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/b3989c257dc5/BMRI2016-2518394.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/7db227e944f9/BMRI2016-2518394.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/fcfbccdc0403/BMRI2016-2518394.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/3cee8af55d06/BMRI2016-2518394.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/d9c2fee6efbf/BMRI2016-2518394.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/15cb1f915631/BMRI2016-2518394.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/730822551dc0/BMRI2016-2518394.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/c46278df9784/BMRI2016-2518394.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/b3989c257dc5/BMRI2016-2518394.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/7db227e944f9/BMRI2016-2518394.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/fcfbccdc0403/BMRI2016-2518394.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/3cee8af55d06/BMRI2016-2518394.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/d9c2fee6efbf/BMRI2016-2518394.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/15cb1f915631/BMRI2016-2518394.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d81/4940521/730822551dc0/BMRI2016-2518394.008.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes.经单侧入路行L5-S1微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:技术可行性及疗效
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2518394. doi: 10.1155/2016/2518394. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
2
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
3
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱:峡部裂性腰椎滑脱与退变性腰椎滑脱的比较
World Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;84(5):1284-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
4
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
5
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?肥胖患者腰椎手术的前瞻性、多机构比较有效性研究:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术是否能带来更好的疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
6
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
7
The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1.微创手术经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后手术节段对患者报告的临床结局的影响:L4-L5 与 L5-S1。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Jan;81(1):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.07.082. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
8
Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.L4-5腰椎滑脱的动态稳定:与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的比较及超过2年的随访
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Jan;40(1):E3. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15441.
9
[Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].[单节段腰椎退变性疾病的微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术短期疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;27(3):262-7.
10
Which lumbar interbody fusion technique is better in terms of level for the treatment of unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis?哪种腰椎体间融合技术在治疗不稳定峡部裂性脊椎滑脱症方面在节段水平上更好?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Feb;12(2):171-7. doi: 10.3171/2009.9.SPINE09272.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in biomaterials and bioactive solutions for lumbar spine fusion cages: Current trends and future perspectives.腰椎融合器生物材料与生物活性解决方案的进展:当前趋势与未来展望
Bioact Mater. 2025 Jul 31;53:656-703. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.07.035. eCollection 2025 Nov.
2
Evaluation of Healthcare Outcomes of Patients Treated with 3D-Printed-Titanium and PEEK Cages During Fusion Procedures in the Lumbar Spine.腰椎融合手术中使用3D打印钛笼和聚醚醚酮笼治疗患者的医疗结果评估
Med Devices (Auckl). 2025 Jan 16;18:37-51. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S493988. eCollection 2025.
3
Risk factors for low back pain after oblique lumbar interbody fusion in patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparative Radiographic Analysis of Fusion Rate between L4-5 and L5-S1 in a Single Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.单节段腰椎后路椎间融合术中L4-5与L5-S1融合率的比较影像学分析
Korean J Spine. 2015 Jun;12(2):60-7. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2015.12.2.60. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
2
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱:峡部裂性腰椎滑脱与退变性腰椎滑脱的比较
World Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;84(5):1284-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
3
Lumbar dorsal root Ganglia location: an anatomic and MRI assessment.
低度退行性腰椎滑脱患者斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后腰痛的危险因素:一项回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2025 Jan 6;11:1494849. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1494849. eCollection 2024.
4
Placement of 2 cages using navigation-guided biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: illustrative case.使用导航引导双门内镜经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术放置2个椎间融合器:病例说明
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2024 Aug 19;8(8). doi: 10.3171/CASE23512.
5
Clinical efficacy and complications of MIS-TLIF and TLIF in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation: a comparative study.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及并发症:一项对比研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 May 28;19(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04806-9.
6
Expandable versus static cages in unilateral biportal endoscopy lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) for treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS): comparison of clinical and radiological results.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎间融合术(ULIF)中可扩张与静态 cage 在治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症(DLS)中的应用:临床与影像学结果比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 17;18(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03979-z.
7
A cross-sectional study of MIS TLIF in treatment of spondylolisthesis: initial good results from 92 Vietnamese patients.一项关于微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS TLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱症的横断面研究:92例越南患者的初步良好结果
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 May 8;85(6):2518-2521. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000746. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Effect of preoperative contralateral foramen stenosis on contralateral root symptoms after unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a ambispective cohort study.单侧经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后对侧椎间孔狭窄对侧神经根症状的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 14;24(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06381-2.
9
Subsidence of Spinal Fusion Cages: A Systematic Review.脊柱融合器下沉:一项系统评价
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1103-1118. doi: 10.14444/8363. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
10
A Proposed Personalized Spine Care Protocol (SpineScreen) to Treat Visualized Pain Generators: An Illustrative Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Reoperations between Targeted Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery, Minimally Invasive TLIF and Open Laminectomy.一种用于治疗可视化疼痛源的个性化脊柱护理方案(SpineScreen):一项比较靶向内镜腰椎减压手术、微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术和开放椎板切除术临床结果及术后再次手术情况的实例研究。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 29;12(7):1065. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071065.
腰段背根神经节位置:解剖学与磁共振成像评估
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Feb 12;9. doi: 10.14444/2003. eCollection 2015.
4
Fusion techniques for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a systematic review.成人峡部裂性腰椎滑脱的融合技术:一项系统评价
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Jun;134(6):777-84. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-1985-9. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
5
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term 4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF):与开放 TLIF 队列相比的手术技术、长期 4 年前瞻性结果和并发症。
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Apr;25(2):279-304. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
6
Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的 5 年疗效比较:配对比较研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 1;38(23):2049-55. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8212d.
7
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and degenerative spondylosis: 5-year results.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症和退行性脊柱疾病:5 年结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1813-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3241-y. Epub 2013 Aug 18.
8
Bone union rate with autologous iliac bone versus local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a multicenter study.自体髂骨与局部骨移植物在后路腰椎体间融合术(PLIF)中的骨融合率:一项多中心研究。
Eur Spine J. 2013 May;22(5):1158-63. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2593-4. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
9
Risk factors for cage retropulsion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of 1070 cases.后路腰椎间融合术后 cage 后移的危险因素:1070 例分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 1;37(13):1164-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318257f12a.
10
A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.比较微创或开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗的有和无工人赔偿索赔患者的围手术期成本和结局。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22):1914-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318257d490.