• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定性研究中的敏感性访谈

Sensitive Interviewing in Qualitative Research.

作者信息

Dempsey Laura, Dowling Maura, Larkin Philip, Murphy Kathy

机构信息

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 2016 Dec;39(6):480-490. doi: 10.1002/nur.21743. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1002/nur.21743
PMID:27434172
Abstract

In this paper we focus on important considerations when planning and conducting qualitative interviews on sensitive topics. Drawing on experiences of conducting interviews with dementia caregivers, a framework of essential elements in qualitative interviewing was developed to emphasize study participants' needs while also providing guidance for researchers. Starting with a definition of sensitive research, the framework includes preparing for interviews, interacting with gatekeepers of vulnerable groups, planning for interview timing, and location, building relationships and conducting therapeutic interactions, protecting ethically vulnerable participants, and planning for disengagement. This framework has the potential to improve the effectiveness of sensitive interviewing with vulnerable groups. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

在本文中,我们重点关注在规划和开展关于敏感话题的定性访谈时的重要考量因素。借鉴对痴呆症照料者进行访谈的经验,我们制定了一个定性访谈基本要素框架,以强调研究参与者的需求,同时也为研究人员提供指导。该框架从敏感研究的定义入手,包括访谈准备、与弱势群体的把关人互动、访谈时间和地点规划、建立关系与进行治疗性互动、保护在伦理上易受伤害的参与者以及脱离接触规划。这个框架有可能提高对弱势群体进行敏感访谈的有效性。© 2016 威利期刊公司

相似文献

1
Sensitive Interviewing in Qualitative Research.定性研究中的敏感性访谈
Res Nurs Health. 2016 Dec;39(6):480-490. doi: 10.1002/nur.21743. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
2
Methodological and ethical issues related to qualitative telephone interviews on sensitive topics.与敏感话题定性电话访谈相关的方法学和伦理问题。
Nurse Res. 2014 Mar;21(4):32-7. doi: 10.7748/nr2014.03.21.4.32.e1229.
3
Engaging men with penile cancer in qualitative research: reflections from an interview-based study.让阴茎癌男性参与定性研究:基于访谈研究的思考
Nurse Res. 2014 Jan;21(3):13-9. doi: 10.7748/nr2014.01.21.3.13.e1218.
4
Qualitative interviewing: encountering ethical issues and challenges.定性访谈:遭遇伦理问题与挑战。
Nurse Res. 2006;13(4):19-29. doi: 10.7748/nr2006.07.13.4.19.c5987.
5
The joys and challenges of semi-structured interviewing.半结构式访谈的乐趣与挑战。
Community Pract. 2010 Jul;83(7):18-21.
6
Breaching the wall: interviewing people from other cultures.打破隔阂:采访来自其他文化背景的人。
J Transcult Nurs. 2007 Apr;18(2):150-6. doi: 10.1177/1043659606298617.
7
Conceptual, holistic, and pragmatic considerations for interviewing research participants.访谈研究参与者的概念性、整体性和实用性考量。
Holist Nurs Pract. 2010 May-Jun;24(3):148-57. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0b013e3181dd4732.
8
The interview in qualitative research.定性研究中的访谈
Urol Nurs. 2005 Apr;25(2):124-5.
9
Researching with people you know: issues in interviewing.与熟人进行研究:访谈中的问题
Contemp Nurse. 2009;34(1):2-9. doi: 10.5172/conu.2009.34.1.002.
10
Challenges in accessing and interviewing participants with severe mental illness.在接触和访谈患有严重精神疾病的参与者时所面临的挑战。
Nurse Res. 2017 Jun 22;25(1):37-42. doi: 10.7748/nr.2017.e1443.

引用本文的文献

1
"Can someone tell me what's going on with my child?": A qualitative study on parental health-seeking behavior for infant regulatory problems.“谁能告诉我我的孩子怎么了?”:一项关于父母针对婴儿调节问题寻求医疗行为的定性研究
Arch Public Health. 2025 Jul 29;83(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01682-5.
2
Prioritizing Participant and Research Team Emotional Safety During Data Generation and Analysis in Qualitative Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Research: Development of a Framework Informed by the GENDER-Q Youth Study.在定性患者报告结局测量研究的数据生成与分析过程中,优先考虑参与者和研究团队的情感安全:基于GENDER-Q青年研究构建的框架
Patient. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00756-4.
3
Ethical challenges in sensitive research: a reflective narrative on managing the clinician-researcher dual role.
敏感性研究中的伦理挑战:关于管理临床医生 - 研究人员双重角色的反思性叙述
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 19;24(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01850-y.
4
Identifying and Taking Action on the Protective and Risk Factors of Black Maternal Mental Health: Protocol for Community-Based Participatory Study.识别影响黑人孕产妇心理健康的保护因素和风险因素并采取行动:基于社区参与式研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 16;14:e70076. doi: 10.2196/70076.
5
Medical Biases and Misconceptions Impact Diagnoses in Males With Loss of Function MECP2 Variants.医学偏见和误解对携带功能丧失型MECP2变异的男性患者诊断的影响。
Am J Med Genet A. 2025 Jun 14:e64147. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.64147.
6
Exploring views and experiences of childbirth-related perineal trauma: a qualitative study protocol for developing a wound management tool and care pathway.探索与分娩相关的会阴创伤的观点和经历:一项关于开发伤口管理工具和护理路径的定性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 25;15(4):e088248. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088248.
7
Unraveling the personality traits of civil heroes in great disaster: a qualitative study.剖析重大灾难中平民英雄的性格特质:一项定性研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 24;16:1512948. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1512948. eCollection 2025.
8
Putting people at the center: methods for patient journey mapping of viral hepatitis services across two LMICs in the Asia Pacific.以人为本:亚太地区两个低收入和中等收入国家病毒性肝炎服务患者旅程映射方法
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12543-w.
9
Relatives' experiences of unsuccessful out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts: a qualitative analysis.亲属对院外心肺复苏尝试失败的体验:定性分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01117-4.
10
Factors influencing the implementation of integrated screening for HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis B for pregnant women in Nepal: A qualitative study.影响尼泊尔孕妇艾滋病毒、梅毒和乙型肝炎综合筛查实施的因素:一项定性研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 11;4(10):e0003006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003006. eCollection 2024.