Goeman Dianne, Renehan Emma, Koch Susan
RDNS Institute, Royal District Nursing Service Ltd, 31 Alma Rd, St Kilda, VIC, 3182, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 19;16:285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1531-2.
Dementia is progressive in nature and the associated functional decline inevitably leads to increasing dependence on others in areas of daily living. Models of support have been developed and implemented to assist with adjusting to living with memory loss and functional decline; to navigate the health and aged care system; and to access services. We undertook a systematic review of international literature on key worker type support roles to identify essential components and ascertain how the role can be best utilised to assist community-dwelling people with dementia and their carers. This review of support roles is the first to our knowledge to include both quantitative and qualitative studies and all models of support.
A systematic review of studies written in English and published between January 2003 and December 2014. Data sources were Medline, PsychInfo and CINAHL, internet, expert consultation and reference lists of included studies. After screening articles to ensure that they reported on a key worker type support role, involved carers and or people with dementia living at home and removing duplicates, eligible papers were appraised and evaluated.
Thirty six studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. Eligible studies were divided into type of support roles and study type. The heterogeneity of included studies and high risk of bias made a meta-analysis inappropriate and it was therefore difficult to draw overall conclusions. However, essential components shared across support worker models that demonstrated a positive impact on carer burden and improved quality of life included: long term intervention, face to face contact, individualised education and support based on needs, multi-disciplinary teams, collaborative input, health/clinical background of support workers, ongoing follow up and inter professional and inter-sectoral collaborations. There was a lack of studies assessing cost-effectiveness.
Studies that include a high quality evaluation of holistic, tailored models of support that identify which components of support produce the most valuable outcomes to assist people with dementia and their carers and families to continue to live meaningful lives are needed. There is also a need for a cost effectiveness evaluation of support worker roles.
PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews: PROSPERO 2014 CRD42014013992 .
痴呆症本质上是渐进性的,与之相关的功能衰退不可避免地导致在日常生活领域对他人的依赖日益增加。已开发并实施了支持模式,以帮助人们适应记忆丧失和功能衰退后的生活;在健康和老年护理系统中找到方向;以及获得服务。我们对国际文献中关于关键工作者类型支持角色进行了系统综述,以确定基本组成部分,并确定如何最好地利用该角色来帮助社区中患有痴呆症的人及其照顾者。据我们所知,这次对支持角色的综述是首次同时纳入定量和定性研究以及所有支持模式。
对2003年1月至2014年12月期间发表的英文研究进行系统综述。数据来源包括医学索引数据库(Medline)、心理学文摘数据库(PsychInfo)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、互联网、专家咨询以及纳入研究的参考文献列表。在筛选文章以确保其报告了关键工作者类型的支持角色、涉及照顾者和/或居家患有痴呆症的人并去除重复项后,对符合条件的论文进行评估。
三十六项研究符合纳入综述的条件。符合条件的研究按支持角色类型和研究类型进行了划分。纳入研究的异质性和高偏倚风险使得进行荟萃分析不合适,因此难以得出总体结论。然而,在对照顾者负担产生积极影响并改善生活质量的支持工作者模式中共同具备的基本组成部分包括:长期干预、面对面接触、基于需求的个性化教育和支持、多学科团队、协作投入、支持工作者的健康/临床背景、持续随访以及专业间和部门间合作。缺乏评估成本效益的研究。
需要开展高质量评估整体、量身定制的支持模式的研究,以确定哪些支持组成部分能产生最有价值的结果,从而帮助患有痴呆症的人及其照顾者和家庭继续过上有意义的生活。还需要对支持工作者角色进行成本效益评估。
国际系统评价前瞻性注册库(PROSPERO):PROSPERO 2014 CRD42014013992 。