风险评分高估:个体心血管危险因素及预防性治疗对美国心脏协会 - 美国心脏病学会 - 动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险评分在现代多民族队列中表现的影响
Risk score overestimation: the impact of individual cardiovascular risk factors and preventive therapies on the performance of the American Heart Association-American College of Cardiology-Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease risk score in a modern multi-ethnic cohort.
作者信息
DeFilippis Andrew Paul, Young Rebekah, McEvoy John W, Michos Erin D, Sandfort Veit, Kronmal Richard A, McClelland Robyn L, Blaha Michael J
机构信息
Jewish Hospital, Louisville, KY, USA.
Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD, USA.
出版信息
Eur Heart J. 2017 Feb 21;38(8):598-608. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw301.
AIMS
To evaluate the 2013 American Heart Association (AHA)-American College of Cardiology (ACC)-Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score among four different race/ethnic groups and to ascertain which factors are most associated with risk overestimation by the AHA-ACC-ASCVD score.
METHODS AND RESULTS
The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), a prospective community-based cohort, was used to examine calibration and discrimination of the AHA-ACC-ASCVD risk score in 6441 White, Black, Chinese, and Hispanic Americans (aged 45-79 years and free of known ASCVD at baseline). Using univariable and multivariable absolute risk regression, we modelled the impact of individual risk factors on the discordance between observed and predicted 10-year ASCVD risk. Overestimation was observed in all race/ethnic groups in MESA and was highest among Chinese (252% for women and 314% for men) and lowest in White women (72%) and Hispanic men (67%). Higher age, Chinese race/ethnicity (when compared with White), systolic blood pressure (treated and untreated), diabetes, alcohol use, exercise, lipid-lowering medication, and aspirin use were all associated with more risk overestimation, whereas family history was associated with less risk overestimation in a multivariable model (all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The AHA-ACC-ASCVD risk score overestimates ASCVD risk among men, women, and all four race/ethnic groups evaluated in a modern American primary prevention cohort. Clinicians treating patients similar to those in MESA, particularly older individuals and those with factors associated with more risk overestimation, may consider interpreting absolute ASCVD risk estimates with caution.
目的
评估2013年美国心脏协会(AHA)-美国心脏病学会(ACC)-动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险评分在四个不同种族/族裔群体中的情况,并确定哪些因素与AHA-ACC-ASCVD评分高估风险最为相关。
方法与结果
动脉粥样硬化多民族研究(MESA)是一项基于社区的前瞻性队列研究,用于检验AHA-ACC-ASCVD风险评分在6441名白人、黑人、华裔和西班牙裔美国人(年龄45 - 79岁,基线时无已知ASCVD)中的校准和区分能力。使用单变量和多变量绝对风险回归,我们模拟了个体风险因素对观察到的和预测的10年ASCVD风险之间不一致性的影响。在MESA的所有种族/族裔群体中均观察到风险高估情况,其中华裔最高(女性为252%,男性为314%),白人女性(72%)和西班牙裔男性(67%)最低。年龄较大、华裔种族/族裔(与白人相比)、收缩压(治疗和未治疗)、糖尿病、饮酒、运动、降脂药物使用和阿司匹林使用均与更多的风险高估相关,而在多变量模型中家族史与较少的风险高估相关(所有P < 0.05)。
结论
AHA-ACC-ASCVD风险评分高估了现代美国一级预防队列中评估的男性、女性以及所有四个种族/族裔群体的ASCVD风险。治疗与MESA中患者相似的临床医生,尤其是老年个体以及那些具有与更多风险高估相关因素的患者,可能需要谨慎解读绝对ASCVD风险估计值。
相似文献
引用本文的文献
JACC Adv. 2025-5-26
本文引用的文献
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016-5-10
N Engl J Med. 2015-4-2
Stat Med. 2010-11-30