Rothwell Jonathan, Massey Douglas S
Brookings Institution.
Princeton University.
Econ Geogr. 2015 Jan;91(1):83-106. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12072. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
The notion that where one grows up affects future living standards is increasingly well established in social science. Yet research on intergenerational economic mobility often ignores the regional and neighborhood context of childhood, especially local purchasing power. We hypothesize that unexplained variation in intergenerational mobility is partly attributable to regional and neighborhood conditions-most notably access to high quality schools. Using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and other data, we find that neighborhood income has roughly half the effect on future earnings as parental income and roughly the same effect as shared sibling characteristics. Growing up in an economically segregated metropolitan area also has a large negative effect on future earnings, though somewhat smaller than the neighborhood effect. We estimate that lifetime household income would be $500,000 dollars higher if people born into a bottom quartile neighborhood would have been raised in a top quartile neighborhood. These results are robust to considerations of regional purchasing power and migration between metro areas. Finally, we replicate the results for economic segregation at the metropolitan level using aggregated metropolitan level statistics of intergenerational income elasticities based on millions of IRS records.
在社会科学领域,一个人成长的地方会影响其未来生活水平这一观念日益得到充分证实。然而,关于代际经济流动性的研究往往忽视了童年时期的区域和邻里环境,尤其是当地的购买力。我们推测,代际流动性中无法解释的差异部分可归因于区域和邻里条件,最显著的是获得高质量学校教育的机会。利用收入动态面板研究及其他数据,我们发现邻里收入对未来收入的影响约为父母收入的一半,与兄弟姐妹的共同特征影响大致相同。在经济隔离的大都市区长大对未来收入也有很大的负面影响,尽管略小于邻里效应。我们估计,如果出生在收入最低四分位社区的人在收入最高四分位社区长大,其终身家庭收入将高出50万美元。考虑到区域购买力和大都市区之间的迁移,这些结果依然稳健。最后,我们使用基于数百万份美国国税局记录的代际收入弹性的汇总大都市区统计数据,在大都市区层面复制了经济隔离的结果。