Fu Tsung-Chieh Jane, Carter Joseph J, Hughes James P, Feng Qinghua, Hawes Stephen E, Schwartz Stephen M, Xi Long Fu, Lasof Taylor, Stern Joshua E, Galloway Denise A, Koutsky Laura A, Winer Rachel L
Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109.
Int J Cancer. 2016 Nov 15;139(10):2201-12. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30283. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
To understand high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) epidemiology in mid-adulthood, we assessed whether associations between incident detection of hrHPV DNA and recent sexual behavior differed according to whether or not there was serologic evidence of prior infection. From 2011 to 2012, we enrolled 409 women aged 30-50 years into a 6-month longitudinal study. We collected health and sexual behavior histories, enrollment sera for HPV antibody testing, and monthly self-collected vaginal swabs for HPV DNA genotyping. Generalized estimating equations logistic regression identified risk factors for type-specific incident hrHPV DNA, stratified by type-specific hrHPV serostatus at enrollment. Population attributable risks of hrHPV due to prior and recent exposure were estimated. When type-specific hrHPV serology was negative, recent sexual risk behavior was positively associated with incident hrHPV DNA (odds ratio in women reporting ≥3 recent sexual risk behaviors [e.g., new or multiple partners] vs. no recent sexual activity = 9.8, 95% CI: 2.4-40.6). No associations with recent sexual behavior were observed with positive type-specific hrHPV serology. Thirty percent of incident hrHPV DNA detection was attributable to prior infection (with positive serology) and 40% was attributable to recent sexual risk behavior (with negative serology). The proportion of incident hrHPV DNA detection attributable to recent sexual risk behavior decreased with increasing age. Among women with serologic evidence of prior infection, re-detection of the same hrHPV type is likely due to reactivation or intermittent detection of persistent infection. Without serologic evidence of prior infection, new detection is likely due to new acquisition or to intermittent detection of persisting infection.
为了解中年人群中高危型(hr)人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的流行病学特征,我们评估了hrHPV DNA的新发检测与近期性行为之间的关联是否因既往感染的血清学证据不同而存在差异。2011年至2012年,我们招募了409名年龄在30至50岁之间的女性参与一项为期6个月的纵向研究。我们收集了她们的健康和性行为史、用于HPV抗体检测的入组血清以及每月自行采集的阴道拭子用于HPV DNA基因分型。采用广义估计方程逻辑回归确定特定型别新发hrHPV DNA的危险因素,并根据入组时特定型别hrHPV血清状态进行分层。估计了既往和近期暴露导致hrHPV的人群归因风险。当特定型别hrHPV血清学检测为阴性时,近期性风险行为与新发hrHPV DNA呈正相关(报告近期有≥3种性风险行为[如性伴新或多个性伴]的女性与近期无性行为的女性相比,优势比=9.8,95%CI:2.4 - 40.6)。特定型别hrHPV血清学检测为阳性时,未观察到与近期性行为有关联。30%的新发hrHPV DNA检测归因于既往感染(血清学阳性),40%归因于近期性风险行为(血清学阴性)。新发hrHPV DNA检测归因于近期性风险行为的比例随年龄增长而降低。在有既往感染血清学证据的女性中,再次检测到相同的hrHPV型别可能是由于持续性感染的重新激活或间歇性检测到。在没有既往感染血清学证据的情况下,新检测到hrHPV可能是由于新感染或间歇性检测到持续性感染。