Bennett R G, Laughon B E, Mundy L M, Bobo L D, Gaydos C A, Greenough W B, Bartlett J G
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 May;27(5):889-93. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.5.889-893.1989.
The Culturette Brand Clostridium difficile test (CDT; Marion Laboratories, Inc., Kansas City, Mo.) is a latex agglutination test for C. difficile. The recent controversy involving the identity of antigens detected by CDT has made decisions on its use difficult. We compared the test results with those of selective culture and stool cytotoxin assays in investigations of two nursing home outbreaks of C. difficile-associated disease in order to formulate usage recommendations. Selective culture for C. difficile identified 27 (19%) of 142 subjects as carriers. CDT and the stool cytotoxin assay identified only 52 and 48% of these carriers, respectively. Compared with the stool cytotoxin assay, CDT had a high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (89%) for the detection of C. difficile disease, but the positive predictive value of the test was only 17% when the prevalence of disease was 2%. We conclude that the CDT should not be used to identify carriers but that it is a sufficiently sensitive and specific screening test for diagnosing C. difficile disease. However, since the positive predictive value of the CDT is low when the prevalence of disease is low, positive test results should be confirmed by the stool cytotoxin assay.
Culturette品牌艰难梭菌检测(CDT;马里恩实验室公司,密苏里州堪萨斯城)是一种用于检测艰难梭菌的乳胶凝集试验。最近关于CDT检测抗原身份的争议使得对其使用的决策变得困难。在两项养老院艰难梭菌相关疾病暴发调查中,我们将该检测结果与选择性培养和粪便细胞毒素检测结果进行了比较,以便制定使用建议。对艰难梭菌的选择性培养确定142名受试者中有27名(19%)为携带者。CDT和粪便细胞毒素检测分别仅识别出这些携带者中的52%和48%。与粪便细胞毒素检测相比,CDT检测艰难梭菌疾病具有较高的敏感性(92%)和特异性(89%),但当疾病患病率为2%时,该检测的阳性预测值仅为17%。我们得出结论,CDT不应用于识别携带者,但它是一种诊断艰难梭菌疾病的足够敏感和特异的筛查试验。然而,由于当疾病患病率较低时CDT的阳性预测值较低,阳性检测结果应由粪便细胞毒素检测进行确认。