Suppr超能文献

患病率优势比与患病率比:选择会带来后果。

Prevalence odds ratio versus prevalence ratio: choice comes with consequences.

作者信息

Tamhane Ashutosh R, Westfall Andrew O, Burkholder Greer A, Cutter Gary R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, U.S.A.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, U.S.A.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2016 Dec 30;35(30):5730-5735. doi: 10.1002/sim.7059. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

Abstract

Odds ratio, risk ratio, and prevalence ratio are some of the measures of association which are often reported in research studies quantifying the relationship between an independent variable and the outcome of interest. There has been much debate on the issue of which measure is appropriate to report depending on the study design. However, the literature on selecting a particular category of the outcome to be modeled and/or change in reference group for categorical independent variables and the effect on statistical significance, although known, is scantly discussed nor published with examples. In this article, we provide an example of a cross-sectional study wherein prevalence ratio was chosen over (Prevalence) odds ratio and demonstrate the analytic implications of the choice of category to be modeled and choice of reference level for independent variables. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

比值比、风险比和患病率比是一些关联度量指标,在量化自变量与感兴趣的结果之间关系的研究中经常会报告这些指标。关于根据研究设计选择合适报告指标的问题,一直存在很多争论。然而,关于选择要建模的特定类别结果和/或分类自变量的参照组变化及其对统计显著性的影响,尽管已有相关认知,但很少进行讨论,也没有发表过带实例的文章。在本文中,我们提供了一项横断面研究的实例,其中选择了患病率比而非(患病率)比值比,并展示了要建模的类别选择和自变量参照水平选择的分析意义。版权所有© 2016约翰·威利父子有限公司。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Gender trends in authorship of randomized clinical trials in dentistry.牙科随机临床试验作者身份的性别趋势。
Braz Oral Res. 2025 Sep 8;39:e082. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.082. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The relative merits of risk ratios and odds ratios.风险比与比值比的相对优点。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 May;163(5):438-45. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.31.
2
Indirect comparison: relative risk fallacies and odds solution.间接比较:相对风险谬误与比值比解决方案。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1031-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.013. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
3
When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk?何时使用比值比或相对危险度?
Int J Public Health. 2008;53(3):165-7. doi: 10.1007/s00038-008-7068-3.
7
Choice of effect measure for epidemiological data.流行病学数据效应测量指标的选择
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Sep;53(9):931-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00210-9.
8
Statistics notes. The odds ratio.统计学笔记。优势比。
BMJ. 2000 May 27;320(7247):1468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7247.1468.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验