Tamhane Ashutosh R, Westfall Andrew O, Burkholder Greer A, Cutter Gary R
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, U.S.A.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, U.S.A.
Stat Med. 2016 Dec 30;35(30):5730-5735. doi: 10.1002/sim.7059. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
Odds ratio, risk ratio, and prevalence ratio are some of the measures of association which are often reported in research studies quantifying the relationship between an independent variable and the outcome of interest. There has been much debate on the issue of which measure is appropriate to report depending on the study design. However, the literature on selecting a particular category of the outcome to be modeled and/or change in reference group for categorical independent variables and the effect on statistical significance, although known, is scantly discussed nor published with examples. In this article, we provide an example of a cross-sectional study wherein prevalence ratio was chosen over (Prevalence) odds ratio and demonstrate the analytic implications of the choice of category to be modeled and choice of reference level for independent variables. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
比值比、风险比和患病率比是一些关联度量指标,在量化自变量与感兴趣的结果之间关系的研究中经常会报告这些指标。关于根据研究设计选择合适报告指标的问题,一直存在很多争论。然而,关于选择要建模的特定类别结果和/或分类自变量的参照组变化及其对统计显著性的影响,尽管已有相关认知,但很少进行讨论,也没有发表过带实例的文章。在本文中,我们提供了一项横断面研究的实例,其中选择了患病率比而非(患病率)比值比,并展示了要建模的类别选择和自变量参照水平选择的分析意义。版权所有© 2016约翰·威利父子有限公司。