• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头部受伤后的反应时间:疲劳、分散与集中注意力以及表现的一致性。

Reaction time after head injury: fatigue, divided and focused attention, and consistency of performance.

作者信息

Stuss D T, Stethem L L, Hugenholtz H, Picton T, Pivik J, Richard M T

机构信息

School of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989 Jun;52(6):742-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.6.742.

DOI:10.1136/jnnp.52.6.742
PMID:2746267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1032026/
Abstract

Three groups of patients who had suffered head injury were compared with matched control subjects on reaction time (RT) tasks. Group I consisted of outpatients previously hospitalised for head injury of wide ranging degrees of severity, assessed at varying intervals after injury. Group II was composed of non-hospitalised mildly concussed patients. Group III was made up of head injured patients of varying degrees of severity assessed 7-10 months after initial hospitalisation for their injury. The reaction time tests were graded in difficulty, from a simple RT response to a complex choice RT test. In addition, subjects were compared in their ability to ignore redundant information during one of the choice RT tests. The findings indicate that traumatic brain injury causes slower information processing, deficits in divided attention, an impairment of focused attention, and inconsistency of performance.

摘要

将三组头部受伤患者与匹配的对照受试者进行反应时间(RT)任务对比。第一组由曾因不同严重程度头部受伤而住院的门诊患者组成,在受伤后的不同时间间隔进行评估。第二组由未住院的轻度脑震荡患者组成。第三组由在首次因伤住院7至10个月后接受评估的不同严重程度头部受伤患者组成。反应时间测试按难度分级,从简单的RT反应到复杂的选择RT测试。此外,在其中一项选择RT测试中,对受试者忽略冗余信息的能力进行了比较。研究结果表明,创伤性脑损伤会导致信息处理速度减慢、注意力分散缺陷、集中注意力受损以及表现不一致。

相似文献

1
Reaction time after head injury: fatigue, divided and focused attention, and consistency of performance.头部受伤后的反应时间:疲劳、分散与集中注意力以及表现的一致性。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989 Jun;52(6):742-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.6.742.
2
Effects of diffuse axonal injury on speed of information processing following severe traumatic brain injury.弥漫性轴索损伤对重度创伤性脑损伤后信息处理速度的影响。
Neuropsychology. 2004 Jul;18(3):564-71. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.564.
3
Attentional factors in response time variability after traumatic brain injury: an ERP study.创伤性脑损伤后反应时间变异性中的注意因素:一项事件相关电位研究。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1997 Mar;3(2):95-107.
4
Effect of stimulus number, target-to-distractor ratio, and motor speed on visual spatial search quality following traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后刺激数量、目标与干扰物比例以及运动速度对视觉空间搜索质量的影响。
Brain Inj. 1997 Jan;11(1):59-66. doi: 10.1080/026990597123818.
5
Dual task performance after focal cerebral lesions and closed head injuries.
Neuropsychologia. 1996 Nov;34(11):1051-6. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00028-0.
6
Reaction time and variability 5 and 10 years after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后5年和10年的反应时间及变异性
Brain Inj. 1996 Jul;10(7):473-86. doi: 10.1080/026990596124197.
7
Memory for source after traumatic brain injury.
Brain Cogn. 1993 Jan;21(1):20-43. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1993.1002.
8
How long does it take to recover from a mild concussion?轻度脑震荡需要多长时间才能恢复?
Neurosurgery. 1988 May;22(5):853-8.
9
Neurobehavioural performance of adults with closed-head injury, adults with attention deficit, and controls.闭合性颅脑损伤成人、注意力缺陷成人及对照组的神经行为表现。
Brain Inj. 1994 Jul;8(5):395-404. doi: 10.3109/02699059409150991.
10
Dual task performance in amnesic and normal people: does resource depletion cause amnesia?失忆症患者与正常人的双重任务表现:资源耗竭会导致失忆症吗?
Cortex. 1994 Mar;30(1):159-66. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80331-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal assessment of post-concussion driving reaction time.脑震荡后驾驶反应时间的纵向评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025 May 14:1-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2025.2497066.
2
Relationship Between Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Cognitive Function in Methamphetamine-Dependent Patients.甲基苯丙胺依赖患者脑源性神经营养因子与认知功能的关系
Psychiatry Investig. 2025 Mar;22(3):252-257. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0346. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
3
Sustaining attention in affective contexts during adolescence: age-related differences and association with elevated symptoms of depression and anxiety.青少年在情感环境中保持注意力:与抑郁和焦虑症状升高相关的年龄差异。
Cogn Emot. 2024 Nov;38(7):1122-1134. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2348730. Epub 2024 May 7.
4
Neurophysiological signatures of mild traumatic brain injury in the acute and subacute phase.轻度创伤性脑损伤在急性期和亚急性期的神经生理学特征。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Jul;45(7):3313-3323. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07364-4. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
5
Moving intra-individual variability (IIV) towards clinical utility: IIV measured using a commercial testing platform.将个体内变异性(IIV)转化为临床实用性:使用商业检测平台测量的IIV
J Neurol Sci. 2023 Mar 15;446:120586. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120586. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
6
Changes in the components of visual attention following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.颅脑损伤后视觉注意成分的变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0268951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268951. eCollection 2022.
7
Portable eye-tracking as a reliable assessment of oculomotor, cognitive and reaction time function: Normative data for 18-45 year old.便携式眼动追踪作为一种可靠的眼动、认知和反应时功能评估方法:18-45 岁人群的正常值数据。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 22;16(11):e0260351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260351. eCollection 2021.
8
A Novel Neuropsychological Tool for Immersive Assessment of Concussion and Correlation with Subclinical Head Impacts.一种用于脑震荡沉浸式评估及与亚临床头部撞击相关性研究的新型神经心理学工具。
Neurotrauma Rep. 2021 May 26;2(1):232-244. doi: 10.1089/neur.2020.0022. eCollection 2021.
9
Evaluation of CogSport for acute concussion diagnosis in cricket.用于板球急性脑震荡诊断的CogSport评估
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021 Apr 22;7(2):e001061. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001061. eCollection 2021.
10
Methodological Problems With Online Concussion Testing.在线脑震荡测试的方法学问题。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 1;14:509091. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.509091. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
A follow-up study of severe brain injuries.重度脑损伤的随访研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1961;37(3):236-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1961.tb07359.x.
2
A feature-integration theory of attention.注意的特征整合理论。
Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5.
3
A prospective study of children with head injuries: II. Cognitive sequelae.一项针对头部受伤儿童的前瞻性研究:II. 认知后遗症。
Psychol Med. 1981 Feb;11(1):49-61. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700053277.
4
The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour.
Neuropsychologia. 1974 Jul;12(3):323-30. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(74)90047-5.
5
Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness. Correlation of experimental and clinical observations of blunt head injuries.脑震荡与外伤性昏迷。钝性头部损伤的实验与临床观察的相关性。
Brain. 1974 Dec;97(4):633-54. doi: 10.1093/brain/97.1.633.
6
Subtle neuropsychological deficits in patients with good recovery after closed head injury.闭合性颅脑损伤后恢复良好患者的轻微神经心理学缺陷
Neurosurgery. 1985 Jul;17(1):41-7. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198507000-00007.
7
How long does it take to recover from a mild concussion?轻度脑震荡需要多长时间才能恢复?
Neurosurgery. 1988 May;22(5):853-8.
8
Long-term recovery of visual reaction time after closed head injury.闭合性颅脑损伤后视觉反应时间的长期恢复
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978 May;41(5):452-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.41.5.452.
9
Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury.预测重度颅脑损伤后个体患者的预后。
Lancet. 1976 May 15;1(7968):1031-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92215-7.