Karlsson Victoria, Sporre Bengt, Ågren Johan
From the *Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and †Unit for Pediatric Anesthesia, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):1004-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001462.
Transcutaneous (TC) measurement of PCO2 (TC PCO2) is a well-established method to monitor assisted ventilation in neonatal intensive care, but its use in the operating room is limited, and the data regarding its performance during general anesthesia of the newborn are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of continuous TC PCO2 monitoring during general anesthesia in newborn infants.
Infants (n = 25) with a gestational age of 23 to 41 weeks and a birth weight of 548 to 4114 g were prospectively enrolled. During general anesthesia and surgery, TC PCO2 was measured continuously and recorded at 1-minute intervals. Five-minute mean values were compared with simultaneously obtained blood gas (BG) analyses of PCO2. Only the first paired TC and BG samples were used in this analysis. We defined precision as 2.1 times the standard deviation of the difference of the 2 samples. P < .01 was considered statistically significant.
We obtained samples from 25 infants. The difference between TC and BG was 0.3 ± 0.7 kPa (mean ± standard deviation) giving a precision of 1.47 kPa. Nineteen of twenty-five (76%) sample pairs displayed a difference of <1 kPa (99% confidence interval, 48%-92%, P = .016). The difference in paired samples was similar for different gestational and postnatal ages and did not appear to be affected by electrocautery.
In this small study, we did not demonstrate that TC CO2 monitoring was accurate at P < .01. This partly reflects the small size of the study, resulting in wide 99% confidence bounds.
经皮(TC)测量二氧化碳分压(TC PCO2)是新生儿重症监护中监测辅助通气的一种成熟方法,但在手术室中的应用有限,且缺乏关于其在新生儿全身麻醉期间性能的数据。本研究的目的是评估新生儿全身麻醉期间连续TC PCO2监测的性能。
前瞻性纳入25例胎龄23至41周、出生体重548至4114克的婴儿。在全身麻醉和手术期间,连续测量TC PCO2并每隔1分钟记录一次。将5分钟的平均值与同时获得的二氧化碳分压的血气(BG)分析结果进行比较。本分析仅使用第一对配对的TC和BG样本。我们将精密度定义为两个样本差值标准差的2.1倍。P <.01被认为具有统计学意义。
我们从25例婴儿中获取了样本。TC与BG的差值为0.3±0.7 kPa(平均值±标准差),精密度为1.47 kPa。25对样本中有19对(76%)的差值<1 kPa(99%置信区间,48%-92%,P =.016)。配对样本的差值在不同胎龄和出生后年龄相似,且似乎不受电灼的影响。
在这项小型研究中,我们未证明在P <.01时TC二氧化碳监测是准确的。这部分反映了研究规模较小,导致99%置信区间较宽。