Andersson G, Axéll T
Department of Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Odontology, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
J Oral Pathol Med. 1989 Jan;18(1):2-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1989.tb00722.x.
The aim of this study was to register and compare clinical oral mucosal lesions and gingival recessions associated with the use of two different smokeless tobacco products, loose snuff and portion-bag packed snuff. Selected for the study were 252 men (mean age 36.3 yr) of whom 184 (mean age 36.0 yr) used exclusively loose snuff and 68 (mean age 36.9 yr) exclusively portion-bag snuff. Oral mucosal lesions were registered according to a four-grade clinical scale. There was a significantly larger proportion of less pronounced lesions, Degrees 1 and 2, among the users of portion-bag snuff compared with the users of loose snuff. This was also valid when differences in consumption data were considered. Smokeless tobacco-associated gingival recessions were found in 42 (23.5%) subjects among the users of loose snuff and in 2 (2.9%) subjects among the users of portion-bag snuff. The results of this study support previous preliminary assessments that clinical changes of the oral mucosa and the gingival margin are less pronounced among those who use portion-bag snuff than among those who use loose snuff.
本研究的目的是记录和比较与使用两种不同无烟烟草制品(散鼻烟和袋装鼻烟)相关的口腔黏膜病变和牙龈退缩情况。选取了252名男性(平均年龄36.3岁)进行研究,其中184人(平均年龄36.0岁)仅使用散鼻烟,68人(平均年龄36.9岁)仅使用袋装鼻烟。根据四级临床量表记录口腔黏膜病变情况。与散鼻烟使用者相比,袋装鼻烟使用者中程度较轻的病变(1级和2级)比例明显更高。在考虑消费数据差异时,情况也是如此。散鼻烟使用者中有42名(23.5%)受试者出现了无烟烟草相关的牙龈退缩,袋装鼻烟使用者中有2名(2.9%)受试者出现了这种情况。本研究结果支持先前的初步评估,即使用袋装鼻烟者口腔黏膜和牙龈边缘的临床变化比使用散鼻烟者的变化更不明显。