• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计重要吗?颈椎间盘置换术正在接受审查。

Does design matter? Cervical disc replacements under review.

作者信息

Staudt Michael D, Das Kaushik, Duggal Neil

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Neurosurgery, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Apr;41(2):399-407. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0765-0. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10143-016-0765-0
PMID:27465393
Abstract

The present article reviews the design rationale of currently available cervical disc replacements. Recent prospective randomized control trials comparing cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion have demonstrated safety as well as equal or superior clinical results. Increasingly, more devices are becoming available on the market. Understanding design rationale will provide context for the surgeon to optimize decision making for the most appropriate prosthesis. Cervical arthroplasty is a technique that is undergoing rapid design refinement and development. Further improvements in device design will enable patient-specific device selection. Understanding the design rationale and complication profile of each device will improve clinical and radiographic outcomes.

摘要

本文回顾了当前可用的颈椎间盘置换术的设计原理。最近比较颈椎间盘置换术和前路融合术的前瞻性随机对照试验已证明了其安全性以及同等或更优的临床效果。市场上越来越多的设备可供使用。了解设计原理将为外科医生提供背景信息,以便为最合适的假体做出优化决策。颈椎关节置换术是一种正在经历快速设计改进和发展的技术。设备设计的进一步改进将实现针对患者的设备选择。了解每种设备的设计原理和并发症情况将改善临床和影像学结果。

相似文献

1
Does design matter? Cervical disc replacements under review.设计重要吗?颈椎间盘置换术正在接受审查。
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Apr;41(2):399-407. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0765-0. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
2
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.与融合术相比,Discover人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学及影像学变化。
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
3
Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study.选择性约束 SECURE-C 颈椎间盘置换术的临床疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心研究性器械豁免研究的两年结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 15;38(26):2227-39. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000031.
4
Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.双节段Prestige LP人工颈椎间盘置换术的长期临床和影像学结果:一项前瞻性随机对照临床试验的结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jul;27(1):7-19. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16746. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
5
Which design and biomaterial factors affect clinical wear performance of total disc replacements? A systematic review.哪些设计和生物材料因素会影响全椎间盘置换术的临床磨损性能?一项系统综述。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3759-69. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3751-2.
6
Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.人工颈椎间盘的临床和影像学分析:Prestige 前瞻性随机对照临床试验 7 年随访:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
7
Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.颈椎间盘置换和前路融合术后的索引和相邻节段运动学:体内定量放射学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 20;36(9):721-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df10fc.
8
Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.一项前瞻性研究,共纳入 98 例患者,分别参与了来自单一研究中心的 3 项单独的研究性器械豁免研究,随访时间至少 2 年。临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Dec;13(6):715-21. doi: 10.3171/2010.5.SPINE09852.
9
Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.颈椎关节成形术后矢状位排列。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun;36(13):991-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182076d70.
10
Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.颈椎前路间盘切除融合术与 Mobi-C 颈椎人工椎间盘置换术治疗双节段颈椎病的前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心临床研究:4 年随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Jan;22(1):15-25. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13953.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative and quantitative retrieval analysis of a ball-and-socket cervical disc replacement.球窝型颈椎间盘置换术的定性和定量检索分析
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jul 5;23:100768. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100768. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
On the suitability of additively manufactured gyroid structures and their potential use as intervertebral disk replacement - a feasibility study.关于增材制造的螺旋结构的适用性及其作为椎间盘置换物的潜在用途——一项可行性研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jul 22;12:1432587. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1432587. eCollection 2024.
3
Safety and Validity of Anterior Cervical Disc Replacement for Single-level Cervical Disc Disease: Initial Two-year Follow-up of the Prospective Observational Post-marketing Surveillance Study for Japanese Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical Disk Replacement With Discover Versus Fusion in a Single-Level Cervical Disk Disease: A Prospective Single-Center Randomized Trial With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.在单节段颈椎间盘疾病中使用Discover人工颈椎间盘置换与融合术的比较:一项至少随访2年的前瞻性单中心随机试验。
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jun;30(5):E515-E522. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000170.
2
Material Science in Cervical Total Disc Replacement.颈椎全椎间盘置换中的材料科学
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:719123. doi: 10.1155/2015/719123. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
3
Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
单节段颈椎间盘疾病前路颈椎间盘置换的安全性和有效性:日本患者前瞻性观察性上市后监测研究的初步两年随访结果。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2022 Nov 15;62(11):489-501. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0148. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
4
Clinical Efficacy of Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Decompression for Symptomatic Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.经皮单侧后路内镜下双侧减压治疗症状性颈椎脊髓病的临床疗效。
Orthop Surg. 2022 May;14(5):876-884. doi: 10.1111/os.13237. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
5
Comparison of kinematic and radiological parameters of three cervical disc prostheses.三种颈椎间盘假体的运动学和放射学参数比较。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):55-61. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_92_21. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
6
Current Concepts of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.颈椎间盘置换术的当前概念
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):1174-1183. doi: 10.14444/8149.
7
An Anterior Dislocation after Mobi-C Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.Mobi-C颈椎间盘置换术后的前脱位
Asian J Neurosurg. 2020 Aug 28;15(3):719-721. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_147_20. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
8
Patient Selection in Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.颈椎间盘置换术的患者选择
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S29-S35. doi: 10.14444/7088.
9
In cervical arthroplasty, only prosthesis with flexible biomechanical properties should be used for achieving a near-physiological motion pattern.在颈椎关节置换术中,为了实现接近生理的运动模式,仅应使用具有灵活生物力学特性的假体。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 9;15(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01908-y.
10
Normal intervertebral segment rotation of the subaxial cervical spine: An study of dynamic neck motions.下颈椎正常椎间节段旋转:一项颈部动态运动的研究。
J Orthop Translat. 2019 Jan 21;18:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2018.12.002. eCollection 2019 Jul.
采用PRESTIGE LP椎间盘的颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:一项前瞻性、多中心研究性器械豁免研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Nov;23(5):558-573. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.SPINE14589. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
4
Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine.多中心、前瞻性、随机、对照的研究性器械豁免临床试验,比较Mobi-C颈椎人工椎间盘与前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗颈椎症状性退行性椎间盘疾病的效果。
Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1007. eCollection 2014.
5
Cervical total disc replacement using a novel compressible prosthesis: Results from a prospective Food and Drug Administration-regulated feasibility study with 24-month follow-up.使用新型可压缩假体进行颈椎全椎间盘置换:一项由美国食品药品监督管理局监管的前瞻性可行性研究的24个月随访结果。
Int J Spine Surg. 2012 Dec 1;6:71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.001. eCollection 2012.
6
Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosis.前路颈椎间盘切除并人工关节置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗颈椎病的比较
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Mar;22(3):460-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
7
Which design and biomaterial factors affect clinical wear performance of total disc replacements? A systematic review.哪些设计和生物材料因素会影响全椎间盘置换术的临床磨损性能?一项系统综述。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3759-69. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3751-2.
8
Cervical arthroplasty: a critical review of the literature.颈椎关节成形术:文献综述
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):2231-45. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.047. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
9
Mid- to long-term outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.颈椎间盘置换与前路椎间盘切除融合术的中远期疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):1115-23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3220-3. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
10
Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study.选择性约束 SECURE-C 颈椎间盘置换术的临床疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心研究性器械豁免研究的两年结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 15;38(26):2227-39. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000031.