Martinelle Ludovic, Dal Pozzo Fabiana, Sarradin Pierre, Van Campe Willem, De Leeuw Ilse, De Clercq Kris, Thys Christine, Thiry Etienne, Saegerman Claude
Research Unit in Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to the Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULg), Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Center for Fundamental and Applied Research for Animal and Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, Quartier Vallée 2, Avenue de Cureghem 7A, B42, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
INRA, UE 1277, Experimental Infectiology Platform, INRA-Research Centre of Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Vet Res. 2016 Jul 28;47(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13567-016-0357-6.
The effect of a superinfection with bluetongue virus serotype 1 (BTV1) was evaluated on two groups of four calves. One group received a commercial inactivated BTV serotype 8 (BTV8) vaccine. This group and the non-vaccinated group of calves were challenged twice (4 months apart) with the European BTV8 strain isolated during the 2006-2007 epidemics. Calves were then infected with a BTV1 inoculum which was found to be unexpectedly contaminated by BTV serotype 15 (BTV15). BTV1 and BTV15 single infections were performed on two other groups of three BTV naïve calves. A severe clinical picture was obtained after superinfection with BTV1/BTV15 in both vaccinated and non-vaccinated animals and after challenge with BTV8 in non-vaccinated animals. BTV1 and BTV15 single infection caused only very slight clinical signs. After superinfection and at the viraemic peak, there were an average of above 1000 times more BTV15 genomic copies than BTV1 ones. BTV1 RNA could be detected only in the spleen of one calf whereas BTV15 RNA was found in 15 organs of seven different animals. BTV8 immunization whether it was acquired through vaccination and challenges or challenges alone did not change BTV1 or BTV15 RNA detection in superinfected animals. However in these animals a partial cross neutralization between BTV8 and BTV1 might be involved in the lower BTV1 replication versus BTV15. Infection with different serotypes can occur also in the field. Interference between virus strains, genetic reassortment and cross-protection were considered as mechanisms to explain the clinical outcomes and the other virological and immunological findings in the course of BTV1/BTV15 superinfection.
对两组各四头犊牛评估了蓝舌病病毒血清型1(BTV1)的二重感染效果。一组接种了市售的灭活BTV血清型8(BTV8)疫苗。该组犊牛和未接种疫苗的犊牛组用2006 - 2007年疫情期间分离出的欧洲BTV8毒株进行了两次攻毒(间隔4个月)。然后给犊牛接种了一株BTV1接种物,结果意外发现其被BTV血清型15(BTV15)污染。对另外两组三头未接触过BTV的犊牛分别进行了BTV1和BTV15的单一感染。在接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的动物中,BTV1/BTV15二重感染后以及未接种疫苗的动物中BTV8攻毒后均出现了严重的临床症状。BTV1和BTV15单一感染仅引起非常轻微的临床症状。二重感染后及病毒血症高峰期,BTV15基因组拷贝数平均比BTV1多1000倍以上。仅在一头犊牛的脾脏中检测到BTV1 RNA,而在七只不同动物的15个器官中发现了BTV15 RNA。无论是通过接种疫苗和攻毒还是仅通过攻毒获得的BTV8免疫,均未改变二重感染动物中BTV1或BTV15 RNA的检测结果。然而,在这些动物中,BTV8与BTV1之间的部分交叉中和作用可能与BTV1相对于BTV15的较低复制有关。在实际情况中也可能发生不同血清型的感染。病毒株之间的干扰、基因重配和交叉保护被认为是解释BTV1/BTV15二重感染过程中的临床结果以及其他病毒学和免疫学发现的机制。